WebCortex

pip install web-cortex-framework

Installs as web-cortex-framework, imports as webcortex — the same split as djangorestframework → import rest_framework.

Python 3.12, 3.13 and 3.14, including the free-threaded build (3.14t), which is the fast path for Python-backed routes.

📖 Documentation · Tutorial · Orchestration · Token economy · Security

A Python web framework with a Rust core, built on one idea:

If you declared it, Rust can run it — and an agent can call it.

Django and Rails were designed when the only client was a browser and the only author was a person. Today the client is just as likely to be a model, and so is the author. WebCortex treats both as the primary case: every declaration is simultaneously a REST route, an OpenAPI operation and an MCP tool; agents, behaviours and flows are first-class and compose; and the whole application can describe itself to the model that is writing it.

# api.py
from webcortex import WebCortex

app = WebCortex("bookstore", database="sqlite://./app.db")

app.api_key("WEBCORTEX_API_KEY", id="service", scopes=["read", "write"])
app.rate_limit(per_second=50)
app.anonymous_scopes("read")

app.resource(
    "books",
    fields={"id": int, "title": str, "author": str, "year": int},
    tools=True,
    read_scopes=["read"],
    write_scopes=["write"],
)

@app.get("/books/{id}/blurb", tool=True, scopes=["read"])
def blurb(id: int) -> str:
    """One-line pitch for a book."""
    return f"Book {id} — highly recommended."

$ webcortex dev

You now have a REST API, an OpenAPI 3.1 document, a live MCP server exposing all six endpoints as tools, authentication, rate limiting, and security headers. No second file, no schema written twice, no drift.

Twenty more lines make it a multi-agent system:

app.models(default="claude-opus-5", fast="ollama/qwen3.5:9b")   # tiers, not models

app.context("policy", data={"max_discount": 0.2})              # what agents know at step one
notes = app.memory("notes", scopes=["read"])                     # a durable, per-user scratchpad

app.agent("librarian", description="Finds and pitches books.",
          tools=["list_books", "get_books_by_id_blurb"], context=["policy"],
          memory="notes", scopes=["read"], token_budget=60_000)

app.agent("front_desk", handoffs=["librarian"], scopes=["read"],
          context_window=40_000, expose_at="/ask")             # hands off; compacts

app.flow("pitch_all", parallel=["librarian", "librarian"])      # orchestration as data

Every one of those is a route, a tool, and an MCP entry. The front desk hands a conversation to the librarian; the librarian remembers what it learned about the caller; the whole run is bounded by one budget; and webcortex context prints the lot in a form a coding model can extend.

Start here

uv venv --python 3.13 && uv pip install web-cortex-framework

webcortex new myapp                # --template api | fullstack | agent | behaviour | orchestration
cd myapp
export WEBCORTEX_API_KEY=$(webcortex keygen)
webcortex dev

Why a Rust core, specifically

Most Rust-accelerated Python servers put Rust at the socket and call Python for every request. You get faster parsing; your handler is still interpreted.

WebCortex puts the boundary somewhere more useful. Python is a declaration language that compiles to a plan the Rust runtime executes. A route whose work is expressible as data — a query, a proxy, a rendered page, a static file, an agent invocation, a flow — runs entirely in Rust and never enters the interpreter at request time. In practice that is most of a CRUD API and all of an orchestration.

$ webcortex check
  19 routes, 17 served without touching Python

When a route genuinely needs Python, it crosses onto a pool of free-threaded interpreter workers (free-threaded CPython 3.14, GIL disabled), each running its own event loop. Handlers run in real parallel — measured at 4.82× vs 1.38× under the GIL (DESIGN.md has the numbers and their caveats).

WebCortex runs correctly on a GIL build too, and tells you which mode it is in.

Behaviours

A "skill" written as a prompt is a suggestion. The model reads it and may ignore it, and "if X then Y" fails silently when it does.

A Behaviour inverts that. The control flow is real Python — a for loop is a loop, an if is a branch, and both execute whether or not a model would have chosen to. Only the leaves are probabilistic, and in v2 the leaves run concurrently:

@app.behaviour("triage", tools=["list_tickets", "update_tickets"],
               model="fast", max_steps=200, token_budget=100_000)
def triage(ctx, input):
    """Classify every open ticket at once and escalate the urgent ones."""
    tickets = [t for t in ctx.call("list_tickets", limit=50) if t["state"] == "open"]

    verdicts = ctx.ask_many(                                   # fifty model calls, one wait
        [f"Grade this ticket:\n{t['body']}" for t in tickets],
        schema={"type": "object",
                "properties": {"urgency": {"type": "integer"},
                               "category": {"enum": ["bug", "billing", "other"]}},
                "required": ["urgency", "category"]},
    )

    escalated = [t["id"] for t, v in zip(tickets, verdicts)     # a real branch
                 if v["urgency"] >= input.get("threshold", 7)]

    ctx.gather(*[                                                # fifty writes, one wait
        ("update_tickets", {"id": t["id"], "body": t["body"], "urgency": v["urgency"],
                            "state": "escalated" if t["id"] in escalated else "triaged"})
        for t, v in zip(tickets, verdicts)
    ])
    return {"escalated": escalated, "usage": ctx.usage}

You get a procedure with deterministic structure and probabilistic steps, rather than a probabilistic procedure.

ctx is how a behaviour reaches the world:

A behaviour is a tool. It registers as a route, so it is automatically an MCP tool, an OpenAPI operation, and something an agent — or another behaviour, or a flow — can call.

The runtime enforces the limits, not your diligence: max_steps caps leaf operations; token_budget caps spend for the run and everything it calls; a behaviour cannot call a tool it did not declare; an approval-gated tool cannot be laundered through a behaviour or a gather; scopes are delegated by intersection, never unioned.

Orchestration

One agent is a tool loop. Several are a system, and a system needs answers a loop never asks: who is in control, what may it do, how much may the whole thing cost, what happens when a human has to decide. Four primitives, all executed by the runtime:

Every agent is a tool. An agent is mounted at /agents/<name> (underscores become hyphens) and exposed under its own name, so app.agent("editor", tools=["researcher", "writer"]) is the entire supervisor/worker pattern. Workers run under a principal delegated from the supervisor's, one nesting level deeper, against the supervisor's budget.

Handoffs. app.agent("front_desk", handoffs=["billing", "technical"]) gives the front desk transfer_to_* tools. Calling one moves the conversation to the specialist — its system prompt, tools and context apply from the next step — while the budget and the caller's authority carry over. Authority can only shrink along a chain.

Flows: orchestration as data.

app.flow("briefing", pipeline=["researcher", "writer"], token_budget=150_000)
app.flow("review",   parallel=["security_review", "style_review"], merge="collect")
app.flow("desk",     route={"billing": "billing", "technical": "technical"},
                     default="front_desk", classify_with="fast")

Every step is a tool — an agent, a behaviour, another flow, a plain route — so composition is uniform, and a flow is itself a tool. Steps map arguments with {"tool": "x", "input": {"id": "$.id", "q": "$input.query"}}.

Sessions. Post {"input": "...", "session_id": "..."} and the conversation continues; the key includes the principal, so callers never see each other's history, and anonymous callers, who share one identity, cannot open one. Long sessions are compacted, not truncated.

Approvals that resume. A gated tool suspends the run; a human decides at POST /_webcortex/approvals/{id} with {"approve": true|false, "note": "..."}; the run continues — including the rest of the turn it was interrupted in. A denial is a tool error the model reads and reacts to.

Budgets compose. The outermost run's token_budget is shared by every agent, behaviour and flow it calls. usage.tree_tokens reports the total.

Token economy

The cost of an agent system is which model answers, how much context each call carries, and how many calls are made. Each has a declaration.

app.models(default="claude-opus-5", fast="claude-haiku-4-5-20251001",
           local="ollama/qwen3.5:9b")
app.provider("groq", base_url="https://api.groq.com/openai/v1", api_key_env="GROQ_API_KEY")
app.pricing("claude-opus-5", input_per_mtok=5, output_per_mtok=25)

• Tiers, not models. Judgement uses default; classification, extraction and routing use fast. Moving a workload to a cheaper or local model is one edit.
• Two wire formats, chosen by prefix. Anthropic Messages and OpenAI Chat Completions — which is what Ollama, vLLM, LM Studio, Groq and OpenRouter all speak. ollama/qwen3.5:9b needs no key. Deliberately not a universal LLM abstraction.
• Prompt caching on by default: the system prompt, context and tool definitions are cached across the steps of a run.
• Bounded context. tool_result_limit caps what the model sees of any tool result; context_window compacts older turns with the fast model when the measured input exceeds it.
• A ledger. GET /_webcortex/usage reports tokens by agent, behaviour, flow and model, and dollars where you declared prices — null, not zero, where you did not.

Context and memory

app.context("policy", data={"refund_days": 30})
app.context("open_queue", sql="SELECT id, kind FROM tickets WHERE state='open' LIMIT 20")
app.context("my_orders", sql="SELECT * FROM orders WHERE customer = ?", params=["@principal"])

@app.context("account")
def account(req) -> dict: ...

notes = app.memory("notes", read_scopes=["read"], write_scopes=["write"])
app.agent("assistant", context=["policy", "my_orders"], memory="notes", ...)

A context provider is resolved when a run starts and injected into the system prompt, bounded by max_chars. @principal binds to the human behind however many agents deep the call is. A memory is four Rust-executed tools — remember, recall, search, forget — keyed by that same principal, so an agent writing on someone's behalf writes to that someone's memory and can never read another's.

The nine kinds of route

Every route is a tool

Mark a route tool=True and it appears in MCP tools/list, with an input schema derived from the handler's own type hints. Agents declared in the same app call those tools in-process — a function call through the same dispatcher the HTTP server uses, not a loopback request. A typo in tools, handoffs or context fails at boot with a "did you mean" suggestion.

What makes agents safe to deploy

Enforced by the runtime, not by your diligence:

Delegated authority. A run executes as caller.delegate_to_agent(...), whose scopes are intersected with the caller's — never unioned — and a handoff intersects again. An anonymous caller cannot launch a privileged agent.

Human approval gates. Mark a route approval="required" and an agent asking for it does not get it. An agent's run suspends until a human decides, then resumes with the rest of its turn. Every other path is refused: a direct MCP call is rejected, a behaviour (alone or in gather) halts, and a flow step fails. Resuming continues the agent that hit the gate, not a supervisor that called it, so give gated tools to the agents people call directly.

Runtime-enforced budgets that compose. max_steps per run; token_budget for the run and everything under it.

Scope-filtered tool lists. tools/list shows only what that caller can invoke.

A full audit trail, including refused calls, handoffs, compactions and approval decisions, at GET /_webcortex/audit.

Security defaults

Deny-by-default throughout; relaxing something costs a line, tightening it costs nothing. API keys are referenced by environment variable, hashed with SHA-256, and compared in constant time. JWT (HS/RS) with mandatory expiry validation. Per-principal token-bucket rate limiting. Security headers on every response. CORS that refuses * with credentials at boot. Path traversal, symlink escapes, and dotfiles refused by the static server. The control plane — including approvals, usage and models — requires webcortex:admin once any authentication is configured.

The frontend, without the mess

Two clean paths sharing one data layer, chosen per route: server-rendered pages executed in Rust (app.page("/", "index.html", sql=..., bind="books")), where a template receives a data object and nothing else; and a typed TypeScript client for SPA frontends, generated from the same route table by webcortex typegen.

AI-native development

webcortex new writes an AGENTS.md (read by Codex, Cursor and most agents) and a CLAUDE.md that imports it, so the rules travel with the project; webcortex context describes the running app for the model extending it; webcortex mcp-config prints the one command that plugs the app into Claude Code, Claude Desktop or Cursor.

$ webcortex context                     # the app, described for a coding model
$ webcortex evolve "add reviews tied to books and a behaviour that summarises them" --model fast
$ webcortex check                       # boot-time validation, with hints

The context pack is the app's shape — routes, tools and schemas, agents, behaviours, flows, context, memory, models, security posture — derived from the manifest in a few thousand tokens, plus a cheat sheet of the framework's API. evolve feeds it to a model (with the app's own aliases, so --model fast can be a local Ollama model) and prints a proposal to review. The loop is describe → propose → check → run, and boot-time validation is what makes it safe to repeat.

AGENTS.md is the machine-facing reference for tools that edit this repository or write apps on it. scout/ is a local-model reviewer that leaves suggestions for the framework's own next iteration.

Commands

webcortex new <name>      scaffold a project (api | fullstack | agent | behaviour | orchestration)
webcortex dev             run with a startup report
webcortex check           routes, tools, agents, flows, and the public attack surface
webcortex security        what is reachable without a credential
webcortex tools           the agent tool manifest
webcortex context         the context pack, for an AI coding tool
webcortex evolve "…"      ask a model to propose an extension
webcortex typegen         generate a typed TypeScript client
webcortex openapi         the OpenAPI 3.1 document
webcortex sql             DDL for declared resources and memories
webcortex keygen          mint an API key

Security

WebCortex has been through an adversarial review of its own controls — auth, authorization, injection, traversal, SSRF, exhaustion, disclosure — plus stress and soak testing. Six issues were found and fixed, each with a regression test in tests/test_pentest.py:

Soak: 1,786,805 requests, 0 errors, 0 panics, memory at steady state.

SECURITY.md has the full report — including what was not tested, the known limits, and what v2 added to the surface.

Status

v2.1.0. Working and tested: the manifest IR, router, native ops (static / query / proxy / page / files / flow), the free-threaded Python bridge, authentication and scopes, rate limiting, CORS, security headers, graceful shutdown, Behaviours with concurrent leaves, the agent runtime with handoffs, sessions, resumable approval gates, composing budgets, tool-result bounding and compaction, context providers, memory, flows, two providers (Anthropic and OpenAI-compatible, which covers local models), prompt caching, the spend ledger, the audit trail, OpenAPI, the MCP server, TypeScript generation, the context pack and evolve. 355 tests (106 Rust, 249 Python, including a 54-test adversarial suite and an offline end-to-end suite that drives the whole agent stack over HTTP), clippy clean.

Not yet: Postgres, token-level SSE streaming, durable agent runs that survive a restart. See DESIGN.md for the roadmap, honest risk grading, and — just as importantly — what is deliberately not being built.

For AI coding tools

AGENTS.md is the machine-facing reference: the complete API surface with exact signatures and defaults, the binding and scope rules, the constraints the runtime enforces, and the specific mistakes that are cheap to make and expensive to debug. Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Aider and Copilot Workspace all read it by convention.

It is written to be correct rather than welcoming. Humans should start with the docs site instead.

Building from source

uv venv --python 3.13
uv pip install maturin pytest
.venv/bin/maturin develop --uv
.venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/

The free-threaded build is also supported and is the configuration the bridge was designed around:

uv venv --python 3.14t

License

Apache-2.0