Skip to main content
zgram Logo

zgram

JIT-compiled PEG parser generator for Python.

Compiles grammars to SIMD-accelerated native code via LLVM JIT, callable from Python with zero-copy text access and a rich Pythonic API.

GitHub Stars Python Zig License

Built with PyOZ


Performance

zgram compiles PEG grammars into SIMD-accelerated native code via LLVM JIT at runtime. No subprocess, no disk cache, no .so files -- grammars compile in-process in milliseconds.

On a JSON parsing benchmark (from Python, including call overhead):

Small JSON (43 bytes):    0.1us  -  8x faster than json.loads
Medium JSON (1.2KB):      1.3us  -  3x faster than json.loads
Large JSON (15KB):       21.2us  -  4x faster than json.loads

Compared to other Python parser generators:

Parser Type Small (43B) Medium (1.2KB) Large (15KB)
zgram PEG, LLVM JIT 0.1us 1.3us 21.2us
json.loads Hand-tuned C 0.9us 4.1us 81.1us
pe PEG, C ext 12.4us (107x) 248us (191x) 4,069us (192x)
parsimonious PEG, pure Python 96.6us (835x) 3,257us (2507x) 44,615us (2108x)
pyparsing Combinator 102us (879x) 2,017us (1552x) 31,566us (1491x)
lark Earley 634us (5478x) 17,231us (13262x) 373,682us (17653x)

Against the fastest parsing libraries in C++ and Rust (Spirit X3, lexy, PEGTL, rust-peg, pest), zgram is the fastest in 15 of 16 benchmark comparisons across a JSON and an expression grammar, whether they build a parse tree or only validate: Spirit X3 building the same flat node array takes 1.3-1.7x longer on typical input, rust-peg with tree actions 3-10x, and for validation only (matches()) compile-time C++ takes 1.2-2.7x longer. The exception is a deeply nested expression tree, where Spirit X3 is 6% faster. See BENCHMARK.md. String-heavy input is where zgram's SIMD code shines: a 75 KB JSON document of long strings parses in 10us (7.5 GB/s).

json.loads does more work (parses + builds Python dicts/lists). zgram returns a zero-copy parse tree.

SQL-to-MongoDB Converter

The included sql2mongo example demonstrates zgram as a real-time query translator. It walks the tree through to_tuple(), so zgram's share of each conversion (parse plus tree export) is about 1-1.5us; the rest is the Python walk and formatting the MongoDB query with json.dumps:

Query                    Parse (us)   Convert (us)   Overhead      Ops/sec
---------------------- ------------ -------------- ---------- ------------
Simple SELECT *               0.1us          7.1us      7.0us     140,434
WHERE filter                  0.3us         12.5us     12.2us      80,184
AND + comparisons             0.3us         15.4us     15.2us      64,739
BETWEEN range                 0.1us         10.9us     10.7us      91,836
IN list                       0.2us         12.4us     12.3us      80,329
LIKE pattern                  0.2us         10.6us     10.4us      94,768
IS NOT NULL                   0.2us          9.9us      9.8us     100,631
ORDER + LIMIT                 0.3us         15.3us     15.0us      65,262
DISTINCT                      0.1us          1.2us      1.1us     854,145
COUNT aggregate               0.3us         12.7us     12.4us      78,905
Nested boolean                0.4us         22.3us     21.9us      44,795
Pagination                    0.2us         12.8us     12.7us      77,836

Installation

pip install zgram-py

The package is named zgram-py on PyPI (zgram is taken); the module is zgram:

import zgram

Prebuilt wheels cover CPython 3.10+ on x86_64 Linux (glibc 2.17+) and x86_64 Windows. ARM (aarch64 Linux, Windows on ARM, Apple Silicon) isn't supported yet: the bundled LLVM only includes the x86 code generator.

From source

Requires Zig 0.16. pip install . builds through the PyOZ build backend.

pip install .

Quick Start

import zgram

# Define a grammar using PEG syntax
parser = zgram.compile("""
    value   = object | array | string | number | 'true' | 'false' | 'null'
    object  = '{' (pair (',' pair)*)? '}'
    pair    = string ':' value
    array   = '[' (value (',' value)*)? ']'
    string  = '"' (escape | plain)* '"'
    @silent escape = '\\\\' ["\\\\/bfnrt]
    @silent plain  = [^"\\\\]+
    number  = '-'? ('0' | [1-9] [0-9]*) ('.' [0-9]+)?
""")

# Parse input - returns the root Node
tree = parser.parse('{"name": "Alice", "scores": [100, 200]}')

# Navigate the tree
print(tree.rule())    # 'value'
print(tree.text())    # '{"name": "Alice", "scores": [100, 200]}'
print(len(tree))      # number of direct children

Grammar Syntax

zgram uses PEG (Parsing Expression Grammar) syntax:

rule_name = expression
Syntax Meaning
'literal' Match exact string
[a-z] Character class
[^a-z] Negated character class
. Any character
a b Sequence (match a then b)
a / b or a | b Ordered alternative
e* Zero or more
e+ One or more
e? Optional
(e) Grouping
!e Negative lookahead (not predicate)
&e Positive lookahead (and predicate)
@silent Annotation: suppress node in parse tree
@memo Annotation: cache the rule's result per position (packrat)

The first rule is the start rule.

@silent Annotation

Rules annotated with @silent match input but produce no node in the parse tree. Use this for whitespace, delimiters, and other structural rules you don't need in the tree:

value  = ws (number | string) ws
number = [0-9]+
string = '"' chars '"'
@silent chars = [^"]*
@silent ws    = [ \t\n\r]*

@memo Annotation

PEG parsers backtrack: when an alternative fails, the next one re-parses the same input. Usually that's cheap, but a rule tried several times at the same position on every level of nesting makes parsing exponential:

expr = term '+' expr / term '-' expr / term
@memo term = '(' expr ')' / 'x'

@memo caches each rule result per input position (packrat parsing), so the rule runs at most once per position. On 14 levels of parentheses the grammar above parses in 0.014 ms with @memo and 56 ms without, and each two extra levels multiply the unmemoized time by 10. Results and error messages are identical either way. Memoization costs a table lookup per call, so add it to the rules that are re-tried, not everywhere. Annotations combine in any order: @silent @memo ws = ....

Predicates (!e, &e) are composable: !!e, !&e, &!e all work as expected.

API Reference

Module Functions

zgram.compile(grammar: str) -> GrammarParser

Compile a PEG grammar string into a native parser via LLVM JIT. Compilation happens in-process -- no subprocess, no disk I/O -- and releases the GIL. The 16 most recently compiled grammars are cached, so compiling the same grammar again returns in microseconds.

await zgram.compile_async(grammar: str) -> GrammarParser

Compile on a worker thread without blocking the event loop (a cold compile takes ~100 ms of LLVM work).

zgram.clear_cache() -> None

Drop the compiled-grammar cache. Existing parsers keep working.

zgram.dump_ir(grammar: str) -> str

Return the LLVM IR text for a grammar (useful for debugging/optimization).

zgram.version() -> str

Return the zgram version string.

GrammarParser

parser = zgram.compile("start = [a-z]+")
tree = parser.parse("hello")
  • parse(input: str | bytes, start: str | None = None) -> Node -- Parse the whole input and return the root node. Raises ParseError on failure. start picks the start rule (default: the first rule). bytes input must be UTF-8 if you call text().
  • match(input: str | bytes, start: str | None = None) -> Node | None -- Match the start rule at the beginning of the input without requiring it to consume everything (like re.match). The root node's end() is where the match stopped. Returns None if it doesn't match.
  • matches(input: str | bytes, start: str | None = None) -> bool -- Does the whole input match? Runs a separate validation-only parser that builds no tree (about 2x faster than parse()). On False, error explains the rejection. The validator is compiled on the first call (0.1-1 s depending on grammar size) and cached with the grammar.
  • rules() -> list[str] -- The grammar's rule names, in definition order.
  • error -> ParseErrorInfo | None -- Property with error details from the last failed parse()/match().
parser = zgram.compile(json_grammar)
parser.parse("42", start="number")      # parse with another start rule
m = parser.match('{"a": 1} trailing')   # prefix match
print(m.end())                           # 9

Node

A node in the parse tree. Supports the full Python sequence and iterator protocols.

Each parse() call produces its own tree, which keeps the input string and the parser alive. Nodes stay valid after the parser variable goes out of scope and after later parse() calls on the same parser:

node = zgram.compile("root = [a-z]+").parse("hello")
print(node.text())  # "hello" -- the node keeps its tree, input and parser alive

first = parser.parse("[1, 2]")
second = parser.parse("[3]")
print(first.text())  # still "[1, 2]"

Methods

node.rule()        # Grammar rule name that matched: 'string'
node.text()        # Matched text (zero-copy): '"hello"'
node.start()       # Byte offset of match start: 0
node.end()         # Byte offset of match end: 7
node.child_count() # Number of direct children: 2
node.child(i)      # Get child by index, or None
node.children()    # All children as a list[Node]
node.find("name")  # This node and its descendants matching a rule -> list[Node]
node.to_tuple()    # Whole subtree as nested tuples, built natively (see below)

start() and end() are byte offsets into the UTF-8 encoded input. They equal string indices only for ASCII input; for other text, use text() or slice input.encode().

rule() returns the same interned string object for every node of a rule, so node.rule() is other.rule() holds and comparisons are cheap.

Protocols

len(node)           # Same as child_count()
node[0]             # Indexing with negative index support
node[-1]            # Last child

for child in node:  # Iteration over direct children (O(1) per step;
    print(child)    # nested loops over the same node are independent)

str(node)           # Matched text
repr(node)          # "Node('rule', 0..7, 2 children)"
bool(node)          # Always True (a Node means the parse succeeded)
node1 == node2      # Equality by position and parse identity

Bulk export: to_tuple()

Creating a Python object per node is the main cost of walking a tree from Python. to_tuple() builds the whole subtree in one native pass as nested (rule, text, children) tuples -- or (rule, start, end, text, children) with spans=True:

tree = parser.parse("[1, true]")
tree.to_tuple()
# ('value', '[1, true]', (('array', '[1, true]', (('value', '1', (('number', '1', ()),)), ('value', 'true', ()))),))

On the 15 KB benchmark JSON, converting the tree with to_tuple() takes 145 us, against 929 us for the equivalent walk through the Node API.

# Find all nodes matching a rule name, in document order
strings = tree.find("string")
for s in strings:
    print(s.text())

# Nested iteration
for child in tree:
    for grandchild in child:
        print(grandchild.rule(), grandchild.text())

ParseError

Raised when parsing fails. Error position uses high-water mark tracking -- it points to the furthest position the parser reached, not just position 0.

zgram.ParseError is a ValueError subclass whose message includes the location:

try:
    tree = parser.parse('{"name": }')
except zgram.ParseError as e:
    print(e)  # "line 1, col 10: expected object"

The exception also carries the details as attributes:

except zgram.ParseError as e:
    print(e.message)  # "expected object"
    print(e.line)     # 1
    print(e.column)   # 10 (1-based, in bytes)
    print(e.offset)   # 9 (byte offset)

The same details stay available from the parser.error property (a ParseErrorInfo) after a failed parse:

err = parser.error
print(err.message(), err.line(), err.column(), err.offset())

Architecture

Grammar string
     |
     v
[Grammar Parser]   -- PEG syntax -> IR (grammar_parser.zig)
     |                 Left-recursion detection, @silent annotation
     v
[LLVM Codegen]     -- IR -> LLVM IR in memory (jit_codegen.zig)
     |                 SIMD char scanning, inline node allocation,
     |                 high-water mark error tracking
     v
[LLVM JIT]         -- LLVM IR -> native code via ORC LLJIT (jit_compiler.zig)
     |                 O3 optimization, vectorization, host CPU targeting
     v
[Python API]       -- Call JIT'd function, expose Node/GrammarParser (lib.zig)
                       Zero-copy input and text, per-parse trees, freelist pooling

Key implementation details:

  • LLVM JIT compilation: Grammars compile to native x86-64 code in-process via LLVM's ORC LLJIT. No subprocess, no .so files, no disk cache. Each grammar gets its own ResourceTracker for independent cleanup.
  • SIMD character scanning: Character class repetitions ([a-z]+, [^"\\]*) test the first 8 bytes one at a time (most runs are a space or a few digits) and continue in an out-of-line 16-byte (SSE2) or 32-byte (AVX2) vector loop only for longer runs. Single ranges, small included sets and small excluded sets are vectorized, including through @silent rules and in loops like JSON's (escape | plain)*: when the other branches can't start with a byte of the class, runs of it are scanned in bulk and the other branches are tried only where a run stops.
  • Inline node allocation: Rule functions reserve nodes via an inlined fast path (compare + increment) with a slow path fallback to zgram_ensure_capacity. Node filling is also inlined -- no function call overhead per node.
  • High-water mark errors: Every rule failure updates max_pos = max(max_pos, pos). On parse failure, the error is reported at the furthest position reached with "expected <rule_name>".
  • Flat node tree: 16-byte FlatNode structs in pre-order with subtree sizes. Iterating children steps from sibling to sibling in O(1), and find() is a linear scan, because a node's descendants are contiguous.
  • Per-parse trees: each parse writes into its own node buffer, which becomes a tree object holding a reference to the input str/bytes. Parsing reads the string's own UTF-8 buffer (no input copy), and text() slices it without copying. Nodes are small (tree reference + index) and reference the tree, so they stay valid across later parses.
  • Compile cache: compiled grammars are shared and reference-counted; the 16 most recent stay cached.

Threads and Async

  • compile() releases the GIL, and compiles from several threads (or compile_async() tasks) run in parallel.
  • parse()/match() release the GIL for inputs of 16 KB or more, so threads can parse in parallel: four threads parsing a 410 KB document take about as long as one.
  • A GrammarParser can be shared between threads. Its error property reflects the most recent failed parse from any thread.
  • Free-threaded CPython (3.14t) isn't supported yet: the wheels use the stable ABI, which doesn't cover it.

Known Issues

  • Each distinct grammar compiled leaves about 130 KB inside LLVM's JIT after its parsers are freed. The compile cache means repeated grammars cost nothing, but compiling many different grammars in a long-running process grows memory slowly.

Project Structure

src/
  lib.zig               # Python module: Node, GrammarParser, compile cache, ParseError
  grammar_parser.zig    # PEG grammar -> IR (with left-recursion detection)
  jit_codegen.zig       # IR -> LLVM IR (SIMD, inline alloc, HWM tracking)
  jit_compiler.zig      # LLVM ORC LLJIT compilation + ResourceTracker
  jit_helpers.zig       # Runtime helpers called by JIT code (node alloc, errors)
  llvm_builder.zig      # Ergonomic wrapper over LLVM C API
  parse_abi.zig         # FlatNode/ParseOutput C ABI structs (16 bytes per node)
test/
  conftest.py                  # Shared fixtures (JSON/list grammars)
  test_node_api.py             # Node/GrammarParser Python API tests
  test_features.py             # Compile cache, async, start rules, match, to_tuple, @memo, threads, SIMD loops
  test_differential.py         # Random grammars/inputs checked against peg_reference.py
  peg_reference.py             # Reference PEG interpreter in Python (for differential tests)
  test_grammar_correctness.py  # Grammar pattern correctness
  test_json_parsing.py         # JSON parsing: values, structures, errors
  test_edge_cases.py           # 115 edge case tests (@silent, backtracking, GC, etc.)
  test_hwm.py                  # High-water mark error position tests
  test_benchmark_json.py       # Multi-parser comparative benchmark
  test_benchmark_sql2mongo.py  # SQL-to-MongoDB latency benchmark
examples/sql2mongo/
  sql2mongo.py          # SQL SELECT -> MongoDB query converter example
build.zig               # Zig build configuration
pyproject.toml          # Python package configuration

License

MIT

Metadata

Release files for zgram-py 0.1.0

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Built distributions (wheels)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for zgram-py 0.1.0
File Interpreter ABI Platform
zgram_py-0.1.0-cp310-abi3-win_amd64.whl CPython 3.10 abi3 Windows x86-64 Details
zgram_py-0.1.0-cp310-abi3-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.whl CPython 3.10 abi3 Linux glibc 2.17+ x86-64 Details

Total release size: 37.8 MB

Release files / zgram_py-0.1.0-cp310-abi3-win_amd64.whl

Download URL zgram_py-0.1.0-cp310-abi3-win_amd64.whl
Size 17.2 MB
Tags CPython 3.10 Windows x86-64 abi3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
ec0e3c645233cd794354e785516cda3dc83b335fa0840180d1fe3b745ea0adb2
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
5ca743645d690c633648db0b5fcd57976486c3d532e0109d543e1a27c53b53e5
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
No
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Release files / zgram_py-0.1.0-cp310-abi3-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.whl

Download URL zgram_py-0.1.0-cp310-abi3-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.whl
Size 20.7 MB
Tags CPython 3.10 Linux glibc 2.17+ x86-64 abi3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
28fa1b9959d7579da516de4eda5c33be331768bc288167350eae6fdf01a71c56
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
7f8974e570d1d7854060ff98104d62960a67deee2757ab74bfae35b798b6096c
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
No
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Release history Release notifications | RSS feed

0.6.0

2 release files

0.5.4

2 release files

0.5.3

2 release files

0.5.2

2 release files

0.5.1

2 release files

0.5.0

2 release files

0.4.2

2 release files

0.4.1

2 release files

0.4.0

2 release files

0.3.5

2 release files

0.3.4

2 release files

0.3.3

2 release files

0.3.2

2 release files

0.3.1

2 release files

0.3.0

2 release files

0.2.1

2 release files

0.2.0

2 release files

This release

0.1.0 This release

2 release files

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page