Skip to main content

zoreal-oauth2

Login with ZOREAL for Python backends: the relying-party half of the flow that @zoreal/oauth2-react starts in the browser.

The browser SDK runs the pairing (QR or app link), and hands your frontend an authorization code plus the code_verifier and nonce it generated. Your frontend posts all three to your backend, and this package does the rest: the code exchange with your client authentication, ES256 verification of the ID token against the provider's JWKS, and the /userinfo read for personal claims.

zoreal-oauth2 (this package)   your backend: exchange, verify, userinfo
@zoreal/oauth2-react           your frontend: the button, the QR, the polling

Install

pip install zoreal-oauth2

Python >= 3.9. One dependency: PyJWT[crypto]. Framework-agnostic: the same client works from Django, FastAPI, Flask, or anything else that can receive a POST. The package ships type hints and a py.typed marker.

Quick start

Build one client at boot and share it; it is thread-safe.

import os
from zoreal_oauth2 import ClientSecretBasic, ZorealOAuth2Client

ZOREAL_OAUTH = ZorealOAuth2Client(
    client_id=os.environ["ZOREAL_CLIENT_ID"],                    # ast_...
    auth=ClientSecretBasic(os.environ["ZOREAL_CLIENT_SECRET"]),
    issuer=os.environ.get("ZOREAL_ISSUER", "https://id.zoreal.com"),
    cache=None,  # optional, for the JWKS; Django's cache object fits as-is
)

The endpoint your frontend posts to (any framework; the body is the {code, code_verifier, nonce} the browser SDK handed over):

login = ZOREAL_OAUTH.authenticate(
    code=payload["code"],
    code_verifier=payload["code_verifier"],  # PKCE is mandatory; the SDK hands it over
    nonce=payload["nonce"],                  # binds the ID token to this login
)

login.sub            # "TC5X-JN7G-YTSE-6E63" — pairwise, stable for YOUR domain
login.acr            # "zoreal.live" | "zoreal.device" | "zoreal.session"
login.assurance      # uniqueness basis, verification month, chip liveness, trust tier
login.email          # from /userinfo, when your client has the email scope
login.email_verified
login.name           # from /userinfo, profile.name scope

Account matching, the shape that works:

user = User.objects.filter(provider="zoreal", uid=login.sub).first()
if user is None:
    if login.email_verified:  # claim, don't collide
        user = User.objects.filter(email=login.email).first()
    user = user or User(email=login.email)
    user.provider, user.uid = "zoreal", login.sub
    user.save()

Assurance levels — acr, and requiring a liveness check

What acr is

acr is an OpenID Connect standard claim — Authentication Context Class Reference. It is a single string in the ID token that says how strongly this particular login was authenticated. Every ZOREAL login carries one, and it is the difference between "someone who once enrolled this identity is behind this request" and "a live human, verified to be the right one, is behind this request right now".

It answers a question the sub cannot. sub tells you who (a stable, pairwise identifier for this person at your site). acr tells you how sure ZOREAL is that the person is really there for this login. A stolen, unlocked phone can still produce a sub; it cannot produce a fresh zoreal.live.

The three levels

Ordered weakest to strongest. Each is what actually happened, never what was requested — a login that could only reach a weaker level says so honestly rather than claiming the level you asked for.

acr What the holder did amr What it proves What it does not prove
zoreal.session Nothing — a returning holder at a site they have used before, resumed silently from an existing ZOREAL session, no phone interaction [] Continuity: the same browser/session ZOREAL already knew That the holder is present, or even awake
zoreal.device Approved the login on their enrolled phone: a signature from a key in the phone's secure element, released by a local biometric or passcode unlock ["hwk","user"] Possession of the enrolled device and a local unlock on it That a live face was captured for this login — an unlocked phone in the wrong hands still signs
zoreal.live All of the above plus a fresh face capture this login: a flash-plus-zoom video scored for presentation attacks and screen replay (moire), matched 1:1 against the government document read at enrolment ["hwk","face","user"] A live, real, unique human, verified to be the enrolled person, at the moment of this login — (this is the strongest level)

amr (Authentication Methods References) is the companion claim listing the factors used: hwk a hardware key, user a user-presence/unlock gesture, face a face biometric. zoreal.live is exactly zoreal.device with face added, because a live login is a device approval with a capture on top. It is on the Login as login.amr.

The default is zoreal.device, never zoreal.session: a login that asks for nothing still requires the enrolled phone and a local unlock. Silence has to be explicitly asked for (prompt=none), and it succeeds only for a returning holder at a site whose consent they have already given.

When to require which

  • zoreal.session — you never require this; it is what a returning holder gets for a low-stakes convenience re-auth when they ask for the silent path.
  • zoreal.device (the default) — a forum, a community, a normal account login. Possession of the enrolled phone plus a local unlock is a high bar already; most sites want exactly this and should pass no acr at all.
  • zoreal.live — a bank onboarding, a high-value transaction, an age-gated purchase, a first login, a "confirm it is really you" step before a sensitive action. Anywhere a fresh, unforgeable proof of the live, right human is worth the few seconds a face capture costs.

Requesting versus verifying — the one rule that matters

Requesting a level and verifying it are two separate steps, and only the second is security:

  1. Request it on the wire, in the frontend, with the SDK's acr_values: "zoreal.live". This is what makes the holder's ZOREAL ID app run the face capture before it will approve. It is advisory — it shapes what the holder is asked to do, nothing more. A browser is attacker-controlled; a value that only travels through it proves nothing.
  2. Verify it here, at token exchange, by passing acr=. The signed acr claim in the ID token — minted by ZOREAL, not by the browser — is the proof.
login = ZOREAL_OAUTH.authenticate(
    code=payload["code"],
    code_verifier=payload["code_verifier"],
    nonce=payload["nonce"],
    acr="zoreal.live",  # raises VerificationError unless the signed token says so
)

login.acr                            # "zoreal.live" — what actually happened
login.live                           # convenience: acr == "zoreal.live"
login.satisfies_acr("zoreal.device") # True (live is stronger than device)

An RP that requests zoreal.live on the wire but never passes acr= here has checked nothing — it has only asked the holder nicely and then trusted a value it never validated.

How the check behaves

Verification satisfies upward: zoreal.session < zoreal.device < zoreal.live, so a requirement of zoreal.device accepts a zoreal.live token (the holder gave you more assurance than you demanded). A token whose acr is below the requirement, missing entirely, or outside the vocabulary is refused with VerificationError. An unknown required value — a typo like "zoreal.liveness" — raises ConfigurationError instead, because that is a bug in your code, not a bad token, and failing every login silently is worse than saying so.

If you prefer to branch rather than raise, omit acr= and inspect the result with satisfies_acr:

login = ZOREAL_OAUTH.authenticate(
    code=payload["code"],
    code_verifier=payload["code_verifier"],
    nonce=payload["nonce"],
)
if not login.satisfies_acr("zoreal.live"):
    # step the user up, or refuse the sensitive action
    ...

acr versus the assurance block

Do not confuse acr with login.assurance. acr grades this login event. The assurance block (login.assurance, a dict) describes the identity behind it — how the person was verified at enrolment (uniqueness basis, verified_on month, whether chip liveness was proven, the trust_tier, the device's key_protection). One is about now; the other is about who they are. A high-value flow usually wants both: acr="zoreal.live" for presence, and the assurance block for the strength of the underlying identity proofing.

Client authentication

Four methods, one class each. Use the one your client is registered with in the ZOREAL dashboard.

from zoreal_oauth2 import (
    ClientSecretBasic, NoAuth, PrivateKeyJwt, TlsClientAuth, ZorealOAuth2Client,
)

# A public client: no secret, no key. PKCE is the only proof, which is why a
# public client can only ever have been granted Tier A scopes.
ZorealOAuth2Client(client_id, auth=NoAuth())  # auth=None means the same

# Confidential, shared secret. The secret travels as HTTP Basic, never as a
# form field.
ZorealOAuth2Client(client_id, auth=ClientSecretBasic(client_secret))

# Confidential, private_key_jwt (RFC 7523). The library builds and signs a
# fresh 55-second assertion per exchange (iss/sub = client_id, aud = the token
# endpoint, single-use jti); your private key never travels. A P-256 key signs
# ES256 (preferred — it is the same key shape ZOREAL certifies), an RSA key
# signs RS256. PEM string, private JWK dict, or a cryptography key object.
ZorealOAuth2Client(client_id, auth=PrivateKeyJwt(pem_or_key, kid="rp-key-1"))

# Mutual TLS: the certificate and key are loaded into the TLS context for
# every call this client makes. Registrable, but the provider does not accept
# it at the token endpoint yet — the 501 it answers surfaces as an
# ExchangeError with that status, verbatim, rather than being papered over.
ZorealOAuth2Client(client_id, auth=TlsClientAuth("cert.pem", "key.pem"))

What each call does

Call What happens
authenticate(code, code_verifier, nonce=None) exchange + verify_id_token, returns a Login
exchange(code, code_verifier) POST {issuer}/token with your client authentication
verify_id_token(id_token, nonce=None) ES256 against {issuer}/jwks, checks iss, aud, exp, and nonce when given
userinfo(access_token) GET {issuer}/userinfo with the Bearer token
Login.userinfo the above, once, memoized; {} when there is no access token

Login reads the verified claims for you: sub, acr, amr, assurance, age_over(threshold), nationality from the ID token; email, email_verified, name, given_name, family_name, birthdate, document_type, document_number, issuing_country, document_expires_on and portrait from /userinfo, fetched lazily.

Errors: ConfigurationError, ExchangeError (carries the provider's OAuth error code and reason, verbatim, plus the HTTP status), VerificationError, UserinfoError. A returning user matched on sub can survive a caught UserinfoError; a signup that needs the email cannot. Token values never appear in error messages.

Things worth knowing before you integrate

  • The ID token never carries personal data. sub, timing, acr/amr, the assurance block, and — if registered — age_over_* booleans and nationality. Email, names, birthdate and document fields come only from /userinfo, which is why authenticate alone is not enough for a signup.
  • The access token lives 10 minutes. Read /userinfo while handling the login; do not store the token for later.
  • sub is pairwise per verified domain. It is the right account key and it is derived from your registered sector: changing your asset's domain rotates every sub you have stored. Plan domain changes as a migration.
  • ES256 only. The provider signs with nothing else, and this package refuses other algorithms rather than negotiating.
  • Always pass the nonce through. The SDK generates it and gives it to your frontend in onSuccess; without it your backend cannot tell a substituted ID token from the real one.
  • Email is a deliberate choice. It is a Tier B scope precisely because a shared email defeats the unlinkability the pairwise sub provides. Request it because you need it, not because the checkbox is familiar.
  • Sandbox clients accept localhost origins; production clients do not. Registration lives in the ZOREAL dashboard on the asset's OAuth2 tab; Tier B scopes (email, profile.*) need a confidential client on a verified domain.
  • Pick the client authentication your posture needs. A public client (NoAuth) is for exchanges that happen where a secret cannot live; ClientSecretBasic is the ordinary confidential setup; PrivateKeyJwt replaces the shared secret with proof of possession of a key that never travels, and is the method ZOREAL's certificate path is built around; TlsClientAuth is registrable but the provider answers 501 at the token endpoint today, and this library surfaces that rather than faking it.
  • profile.portrait is registrable but not served yet. Login.portrait exists so your code does not change when it ships; expect None until then.

Development against a local provider

Point issuer at your provider instance. The issuer value must match the iss inside the tokens exactly — it is compared, not normalized.

Development on this package

python3 -m venv .venv
.venv/bin/pip install -e ".[dev]"
.venv/bin/pytest

The tests are offline: keys are generated in-process and the JWKS fetch is stubbed.

The ZOREAL OAuth2 library family

Repository Package Role
zoreal-oauth2-react @zoreal/oauth2-react (npm) React frontend: the button, the QR, the polling
zoreal-oauth2-js @zoreal/oauth2-js (npm) Framework-free browser core
zoreal-oauth2-react-native @zoreal/oauth2-react-native (npm) React Native frontend
zoreal-oauth2-node @zoreal/oauth2-node (npm) Node.js backend
zoreal-oauth2-ruby zoreal-oauth2 (RubyGems) Ruby backend
zoreal-oauth2-python zoreal-oauth2 (PyPI) Python backend
zoreal-oauth2-php zoreal/oauth2 (Packagist) PHP backend
zoreal-oauth2-go github.com/Bynn-Intelligence/zoreal-oauth2-go Go backend
zoreal-oauth2-java com.zoreal:oauth2 (Maven Central) JVM backend
zoreal-oauth2-dotnet Zoreal.OAuth2 (NuGet) .NET backend

License

MIT.

Download files

Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.

Source Distribution

zoreal_oauth2-0.1.3.tar.gz (22.1 kB view details)

Uploaded Source

Built Distribution

If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.

zoreal_oauth2-0.1.3-py3-none-any.whl (19.3 kB view details)

Uploaded Python 3

File details

Details for the file zoreal_oauth2-0.1.3.tar.gz.

File metadata

  • Download URL: zoreal_oauth2-0.1.3.tar.gz
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 22.1 kB
  • Tags: Source
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
  • Uploaded via: twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

File hashes

Hashes for zoreal_oauth2-0.1.3.tar.gz
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 a03866ce704cb4cacff266b66a5a8d4e78eaa0945543cf22ea859bbfbb5a09b5
MD5 6387d93a7db58971d7c51103322f2351
BLAKE2b-256 5880fd2edd07db77786ba55be1aa3e56428b3e84ddbce878e824012ea4570dc8

See more details on using hashes here.

File details

Details for the file zoreal_oauth2-0.1.3-py3-none-any.whl.

File metadata

  • Download URL: zoreal_oauth2-0.1.3-py3-none-any.whl
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 19.3 kB
  • Tags: Python 3
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
  • Uploaded via: twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

File hashes

Hashes for zoreal_oauth2-0.1.3-py3-none-any.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 672e85ed388a77928be0bb8f8ed58d0e83336d59ccfa0623299b813522bd59b0
MD5 219b9f830a61184a0058910ad81a1b66
BLAKE2b-256 60f8a94a206dfc012ac2f249551ce428d9c14408a17fed46d39eefd62efd555a

See more details on using hashes here.

Release history Release notifications | RSS feed

0.1.6

2 files

0.1.5

2 files

0.1.4

2 files

This release

0.1.3 This release

2 files

0.1.2

2 files

0.1.1

2 files

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page