Auditor/Executor Protocol
A two-role protocol for running multi-phase work through AI agents without the plan drifting into open-ended discussion and without "all tests pass" masquerading as verification.
The Auditor defines what "done" means and proves it independently. The Executor implements one numbered task at a time and logs command output. Neither role crosses into the other.
SKILL.md specifies the protocol core; references/ holds the parts an agent loads only when it reaches that step (task and gate writing, handoff templates, Autonomous mode, failure modes and a worked example). aepkit is a zero-dependency Python CLI that automates scaffolding, drift linting, negative controls, status tallies, and installing the skill into your agent.
When to Reach for This
Prompting an agent, scanning a diff, and shipping when it looks right works well for exploratory scripts and prototypes.
That approach fails when late mistakes carry real costs:
- Financial calculations and balance transfers
- Authorization, tenant isolation, and permission boundaries
- Destructive database schema migrations
- Automated background workers that run without human supervision
In these environments, plausible diffs are not evidence. Two failure modes break multi-session work:
- Silent Plan Drift: Implementing agents quietly resolve ambiguities with assumptions instead of stopping to ask.
- Superficial Verification: Reports like "reviewed and looks correct" mask unexecuted checks. Suites stay green because test fixtures bypass the assertion, not because the boundary holds.
The Auditor/Executor Protocol prevents both using a strict four-document paper trail and mandatory negative controls: a security check is not verified until you watch it fail with the protection removed.
The Two Roles
| Role | Owns | Never | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Auditor | Instructions, gates, verdicts | Writes feature code | Task expansions, verdicts, remediation orders |
| Executor | Implementation, terminal evidence | Redesigns architecture, expands scope | Working code, unedited terminal output |
The Auditor never takes the Executor's word for a result: it re-runs every verify command and gate itself before giving a verdict. That is what stops a pasted "tested and working" from closing a task.
One person can run this workflow alone by switching hats between two isolated agent sessions. Keep them isolated, so the Auditor is never checking its own work.
The Four-Document Paper Trail
aepkit init generates the first three documents and an empty annexes/ directory for the fourth. Keeping them separate prevents instructions from turning back into a discussion:
- Plan of Record (
plan-of-record.md): Explains the what and the why. Opportunity framing (target outcome, problem/friction, cost of doing nothing), set-based shaping (three evaluated options or an explicitN/A (Deterministic Fix/Compliance)bypass), riskiest-assumption prioritization for the first phase, architecture decisions, explicit non-goals, phase roadmaps, and the deferred items ledger. Nobody implements directly from this file. - Execution Guide (
execution-guide.md): Explains the how. Numbered tasks (P0-T1) with target files, steps, literal verify commands, and phase gates (P0-G1). - Compliance Log (
compliance-log.md): Records evidence. Holds a status board and one report entry per task and gate ID; the template starts withP0-T1andP0-G1, and you add an entry for each task you write. The Executor pastes verbatim command output here. - Remediation Annexes (
annexes/): When an audit yieldsCONDITIONALorREJECTED, the Auditor issues a standalone annex instead of editing tasks in flight. Rapid annex growth signals an under-planned phase.
Quickstart
1. Install aepkit
Requires Python 3.11+ with zero third-party dependencies:
pipx install aepkit
To run the latest main instead, use pipx install git+https://github.com/tBeltty/auditor-executor-protocol.
Or from a clone, for development:
git clone https://github.com/tBeltty/auditor-executor-protocol.git
cd auditor-executor-protocol
pip install -e .
2. Install the Protocol into Your Agent
Provision SKILL.md and its references/ directory into your workspace or global environment. Cursor rules hold a single file, so Cursor receives one bundled .mdc with the references appended:
aepkit install-skill # auto-detects Antigravity, Claude Code, or Cursor
aepkit install-skill --agent antigravity # writes to .agents/skills/auditor-executor-protocol/
aepkit install-skill --agent claude # writes to .claude/skills/auditor-executor-protocol/
aepkit install-skill --agent cursor # writes to .cursor/rules/auditor-executor-protocol.mdc
aepkit install-skill --global # user-level install (Antigravity unless --agent is given)
aepkit install-skill --dest <path> # explicit destination; a non-SKILL.md file name gets one bundled file
Auto-detection checks the target directory for .agents/ or .gemini/, .claude/, and .cursor/, then agent environment variables, and falls back to Antigravity. With --global, the skill goes to ~/.gemini/config/skills/, ~/.claude/skills/, or ~/.cursor/rules/. An existing install is skipped unless you pass --force.
3. Scaffold a Phased Project
aepkit init docs/<task-name> --name "<Task Name>"
Creates plan-of-record.md, execution-guide.md, compliance-log.md, and annexes/. --name defaults to the directory name; existing documents are kept unless you pass --force.
4. Track Status and Lint Drift
Inspect open tasks and tallied verdicts:
aepkit status docs/<task-name>
Cross-check document consistency:
aepkit lint docs/<task-name>
aepkit lint catches an empty guide, tasks without a report line, missing report entries, log entries with no matching task, DONE reports whose verify output is not pasted in a code block, gates without a stated negative control (hypothetical or waived ones do not count), work reported in a phase before every earlier phase is APPROVED, unfilled opportunity/shaping/non-goal fields in plan-of-record.md once work is reported DONE or audited, open rows in the deferred items ledger for a phase being closed, duplicated log paragraphs, and annex buildup past --annex-threshold (default 6, overall or per phase). It checks that evidence is present and in the right form, not that it is genuine; the Auditor's re-run does that.
5. Run a Negative Control
When validating an authorization, tenant, or schema boundary:
aepkit negcontrol \
--file server/middleware/auth.js \
--break-cmd "sed -i '' 's/requireAuth/\/\/requireAuth/' server/middleware/auth.js" \
--test-cmd "npm test -- auth.test.js" \
--expect "401|Unauthorized"
The sed -i '' form above is BSD/macOS sed; on GNU/Linux use sed -i 's/.../.../' file.
negcontrol backs up the target file, applies the break mutation, confirms the test fails, restores the file with byte-level verification, confirms the test passes, and outputs a transcript ready for compliance-log.md. Without --file, pass --restore-cmd to undo the break yourself; with both, the backup still wins if the file is not byte-identical afterwards. --timeout limits each command in seconds.
A failure only proves something if it is the failure you meant. A syntax error, a missing import or a mistyped test command also makes the test exit non-zero. --expect takes a regular expression that the failing run's output must match, and the control fails if it does not. Without --expect, output that looks like a syntax, import, collection, timeout or command-not-found error is flagged with a WARNING next to the OK, and you need to read the transcript to confirm the reason.
CLI Reference
| Command | Options | Description |
|---|---|---|
aepkit init <dir> |
--name, --force |
Scaffold the three documents and annexes/ from templates |
aepkit install-skill [dir] |
--agent, --global, --dest, --force |
Provision SKILL.md and references/ into Antigravity, Claude Code, or Cursor |
aepkit lint <dir> |
--annex-threshold |
Cross-check IDs both ways, flag DONE without evidence, detect missing negative controls, and flag log rot |
aepkit negcontrol |
--test-cmd (required), --file, --break-cmd, --restore-cmd, --expect, --timeout |
Run automated backup, break, fail, restore, and pass cycle |
aepkit status <dir> |
Combine status board verdicts with reports; list everything not APPROVED |
python -m aepkit works the same as aepkit. Errors go to stderr.
Exit codes: lint and negcontrol return 0 when clean, 1 when they find a problem, and 2 on a usage error or missing document, so both can gate CI. status is informational and returns 0 whenever the compliance log exists.
aepkit reads and writes local Markdown files only: no external databases, daemons, or network calls. negcontrol runs the shell commands you pass it.
Running Tests
Run the test suite using the standard library runner:
python3 tests/run.py
Or run with pytest by installing test extras:
pip install -e ".[test]"
pytest
Contributing
Contributions are welcome. CONTRIBUTING.md covers the development setup, the quality gates, and the PR checklist; participation follows the CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md. Report vulnerabilities privately as described in SECURITY.md. Changes are listed in CHANGELOG.md.
License
MIT (see LICENSE).
Made with ♥️ by tBelt.
Metadata
Release files for aepkit 0.6.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | Provenance | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| aepkit-0.6.0.tar.gz | 89.2 kB | With provenance | Details for aepkit-0.6.0.tar.gz |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Actions Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| aepkit-0.6.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details for aepkit-0.6.0-py3-none-any.whl |
Total release size: 142.2 kB
Release files / aepkit-0.6.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | aepkit-0.6.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 89.2 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
19eb8ffdb56c7f46c5e7093c4ac4ca65408147766bcff6d7825f118ec66a8ec3
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
dc7e8b32eb387c2d0f1400a60fbb9e92c23e0e010dcaf7570dedc26f53a1e17d
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 25, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / aepkit-0.6.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | aepkit-0.6.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 53.0 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
16467159a92c1ec234d42db3fe23cc6faab9f06c4f36f4b75d354a3e78a673ca
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
6ca245392cb711ec86d54a4b8b6bb37a4f3cd026ce75c34ef8bb8ca4875d8a1d
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 25, 2026.
Transparency logSecurity for aepkit 0.6.0
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
Full provenance
Both files in this release have been uploaded with provenance metadata.
Attestation for aepkit-0.6.0.tar.gz
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 25, 2026.
Transparency logA note on package security
PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.
To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.