Skip to main content

Auditor/Executor Protocol

CI PyPI Python 3.11+ License: MIT Code style: ruff Checked with mypy DOI Zero Dependencies

A protocol for multi-phase work done by AI agents, with two roles. The Auditor writes the plan as numbered tasks with gates, defines what "done" means for each, and checks every delivery by running it again. The Executor does one task at a time and pastes the command output that shows it works.

SKILL.md holds the core of the protocol. references/ holds the parts an agent reads only when it reaches that step: writing tasks and gates, handoff templates, Autonomous mode, failure modes and a worked example.

aepkit is a Python CLI with no dependencies. It scaffolds the documents, lints them for drift, runs negative controls, tallies status, and installs the skill into your agent. On Claude Code, an optional plugin also shows a run's progress beside the chat, holds back Executor launches when the machine is busy, and compacts the Auditor's session when a phase closes.


When to use it

For a script or a prototype, prompting an agent, reading the diff and shipping when it looks right is enough. It stops being enough where a mistake found late is expensive:

  • financial calculations and balance transfers;
  • authorization, tenant isolation and permission boundaries;
  • destructive database migrations;
  • background workers that run with nobody watching.

There, a diff that looks right proves little, and two failures come back session after session:

  1. The plan drifts. The implementing agent meets an ambiguity, picks an answer and moves on without saying so. A few sessions later the work no longer matches the plan.
  2. The checks never ran. A report says "reviewed and looks correct" about a check nobody executed, or a suite stays green because its fixtures skip the assertion that guards the boundary.

The protocol answers the first with four separate documents and the second with negative controls: a security check counts as verified once you have watched it fail with the protection removed.


The two roles

Role Owns Never Output
Auditor Instructions, gates, verdicts Writes feature code Task expansions, verdicts, remediation orders
Executor Implementation, terminal evidence Redesigns architecture, expands scope Working code, unedited terminal output

Before giving a verdict, the Auditor runs every verify command and gate again itself, so a pasted "tested and working" closes nothing on its own.

One person can hold both roles, in two separate agent sessions. Keep them separate, so the Auditor never checks its own work.

The owner picks one of two modes at the start of a run. In Guided mode the owner pastes each handoff into a fresh Executor session and sees every verdict. In Autonomous mode the Auditor launches Executors as subagents with an explicit model per task, answers their BLOCKED questions with a decision entry in the log, and reports once per closed phase, interrupting the owner only for a numbered critical-risk list (references/autonomous-mode.md).

When a phase closes, the Auditor's session can be compacted and resumed from the documents on disk. In Guided mode the owner does it by hand: /compact, then the resume message the Auditor gives. In Autonomous mode the Auditor does it alone, with the Claude Code plugin's compact_and_resume tool (section 6), and the owner only gets a countdown to cancel it.


The four documents

aepkit init creates the first three, and an empty annexes/ folder for the fourth. They stay separate so the instructions an Executor follows never mix with the discussion behind them.

  1. plan-of-record.md holds the what and the why: the opportunity (target outcome, problem, cost of doing nothing), three options compared or an explicit N/A (Deterministic Fix/Compliance) bypass, the riskiest assumption for the first phase to test, the decisions, the non-goals, the phases, and the deferred items ledger. Nobody implements from it.
  2. execution-guide.md holds the how: numbered tasks (P0-T1) with their files, steps and literal verify commands, and a gate (P0-G1) that closes each phase.
  3. compliance-log.md holds the evidence: a status board and one report entry per task and gate. The template starts with P0-T1 and P0-G1; add an entry for each task you write. The Executor pastes command output here, unedited.
  4. annexes/ holds the corrections. After a CONDITIONAL or REJECTED audit, the Auditor writes a standalone annex and leaves the order already in flight untouched. A phase that keeps adding annexes was planned too thinly.

Quickstart

1. Install aepkit

It needs Python 3.11 or later, and nothing else:

pipx install aepkit

To run the latest main instead, use pipx install git+https://github.com/tBeltty/auditor-executor-protocol.

Or from a clone, for development:

git clone https://github.com/tBeltty/auditor-executor-protocol.git
cd auditor-executor-protocol
pip install -e .

2. Install the protocol in your agent

This copies SKILL.md and its references/ folder into your agent's skills, for one project or for your user. Cursor rules are a single file, so Cursor gets one .mdc with the references appended:

aepkit install-skill                     # auto-detects Antigravity, Claude Code, or Cursor
aepkit install-skill --agent antigravity # writes to .agents/skills/auditor-executor-protocol/
aepkit install-skill --agent claude      # writes to .claude/skills/auditor-executor-protocol/
aepkit install-skill --agent cursor      # writes to .cursor/rules/auditor-executor-protocol.mdc
aepkit install-skill --global            # user-level install (Antigravity unless --agent is given)
aepkit install-skill --dest <path>       # explicit destination; a non-SKILL.md file name gets one bundled file

Auto-detection checks the target directory for .agents/ or .gemini/, .claude/, and .cursor/, then agent environment variables, and falls back to Antigravity. With --global, the skill goes to ~/.gemini/config/skills/, ~/.claude/skills/, or ~/.cursor/rules/. An existing install is skipped unless you pass --force.

On Claude Code you can install the plugin in section 6 instead: it brings the same skill and the aeprogress pane.

3. Start a run

aepkit init docs/<task-name> --name "<Task Name>"

Creates plan-of-record.md, execution-guide.md, compliance-log.md, and annexes/. --name defaults to the directory name; existing documents are kept unless you pass --force.

4. Check status and drift

See what is open and how the verdicts add up:

aepkit status docs/<task-name>

aepkit status --json docs/<task-name> prints the same reading as JSON, with each ID's phase, effective state and executor, and the phases with their titles from execution-guide.md (and weights from an optional Weight column in the plan's phase table), for scripts and tools to use instead of parsing the log.

Check that the documents agree with each other:

aepkit lint docs/<task-name>

aepkit lint catches an empty guide, tasks without a report line, missing report entries, log entries with no matching task, DONE reports whose verify output is not pasted in a code block, gates without a stated negative control (hypothetical or waived ones do not count), work reported in a phase before every earlier phase is APPROVED, unfilled opportunity/shaping/non-goal fields in plan-of-record.md once work is reported DONE or audited, open rows in the deferred items ledger for a phase being closed, duplicated log paragraphs, and annex buildup past --annex-threshold (default 6 in total, with a per-phase breakdown). It checks that the evidence is there and in the right form. Whether it is genuine is for the Auditor's re-run to establish.

5. Run a negative control

When validating an authorization, tenant, or schema boundary:

aepkit negcontrol \
  --file server/middleware/auth.js \
  --break-cmd "sed -i '' 's/requireAuth/\/\/requireAuth/' server/middleware/auth.js" \
  --test-cmd "npm test -- auth.test.js" \
  --expect "401|Unauthorized"

The sed -i '' form above is BSD/macOS sed; on GNU/Linux use sed -i 's/.../.../' file.

negcontrol backs up the target file, applies the break mutation, confirms the test fails, restores the file with byte-level verification, confirms the test passes, and outputs a transcript ready for compliance-log.md. Without --file, pass --restore-cmd to undo the break yourself; with both, the backup still wins if the file is not byte-identical afterwards. --file needs --break-cmd, because the backup must be taken before the break. --timeout limits each command in seconds, and a test that hangs fails the control, since a hang catches nothing.

A failing test proves the protection works only when it fails for the reason you broke. A syntax error, a missing import or a mistyped test command also makes the test exit non-zero. --expect takes a regular expression that the failing run's output must match, and the control fails if it does not. Without --expect, output that looks like a syntax, import, collection or command-not-found error is flagged with a WARNING next to the OK, and you need to read the transcript to confirm the reason.

6. Optional: the Claude Code plugin

On Claude Code, one plugin, auditor-executor-protocol, brings the protocol as a skill (the same SKILL.md and references/ that aepkit install-skill --agent claude installs) and aeprogress, a mod for runs where the Auditor launches Executors as subagents or as workers of a harness such as Orca.

The protocol works without the mod. The mod needs the protocol: it reads a run through aepkit status --json, so it needs aepkit and a run (steps 1 and 3), and without one it shows nothing.

The aeprogress pane: 43.3% overall, a bar per phase, the active phase P2 open with its task chips, P2-T3 in progress on a subagent, P2-T4 awaiting audit and P2-T2 conditional
  1. A pane beside the chat shows the overall percentage, one bar per phase (weighted by an optional Weight column in the plan), who is working on which task ID (Claude Code subagents, Orca workers, or any harness through a command of your own), what awaits audit, what needs attention, and the machine's load. It refreshes after each turn, and every 20 seconds while it is open.

  2. A launch limit: while a run is found, the mod refuses to launch another Executor past 2 live workers, 1 building worker, or a machine more than 75% busy for a build, and the refusal says which limit was hit. A handoff that builds nothing carries the line Load: docs-only (references/handoffs.md) and only answers to the worker count. On macOS it also recommends excluding the project from Spotlight when indexing keeps the machine busy.

    A second building Executor refused: 1 building worker is live (limit 1)
  3. Compaction when a phase closes: in Autonomous mode, once a gate is APPROVED and the Auditor brief is up to date on disk, the Auditor calls the mod's compact_and_resume tool. After its turn, a 40-second countdown lets you cancel; then the session is compacted and the Auditor resumes from its own message. Typing a prompt, pressing Esc or running /compact yourself takes over.

    The countdown band: Compacting in 33s, with Cancel and Compact now

Install the plugin at the prompt of a Claude Code terminal session, then open the pane on a run:

/plugin install auditor-executor-protocol --marketplace tBeltty/auditor-executor-protocol
/aeprogress docs/<task-name>

It works in the terminal and in the desktop app's local sessions (in the app: + next to the prompt, Plugins, Add marketplace). It needs Claude Code 2.1.287 or later, and every limit and feature is an option in /config.

It sends no data about you anywhere. Its one network request, a daily version check, can be turned off, and its README lists every process it starts and everything it can refuse. To get new versions automatically, turn on auto-update once: /plugin, Marketplaces, auditor-executor-protocol, Enable auto-update.

Setup, options and how each number is computed: integrations/claude-code/aeprogress.


CLI reference

Command Options Description
aepkit init <dir> --name, --force Scaffold the three documents and annexes/ from templates
aepkit install-skill [dir] --agent, --global, --dest, --force Provision SKILL.md and references/ into Antigravity, Claude Code, or Cursor
aepkit lint <dir> --annex-threshold Cross-check IDs both ways, flag DONE without evidence, detect missing negative controls, and flag log rot
aepkit negcontrol --test-cmd (required), --file, --break-cmd, --restore-cmd, --expect, --timeout Run automated backup, break, fail, restore, and pass cycle
aepkit status <dir> --json Combine status board verdicts with reports; list everything not APPROVED

python -m aepkit works the same as aepkit. Errors go to stderr.

Exit codes: lint and negcontrol return 0 when clean, 1 when they find a problem, and 2 on a usage error or missing document, so both can gate CI. status is informational and returns 0 whenever the compliance log exists.

aepkit reads and writes local Markdown files only: no external databases, daemons, or network calls. negcontrol runs the shell commands you pass it.


Running the tests

With the standard library runner:

python3 tests/run.py

Or with pytest, after installing the test extras:

pip install -e ".[test]"
pytest

Contributing

Contributions are welcome. CONTRIBUTING.md covers the development setup, the quality gates, and the PR checklist; participation follows the CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md. Report vulnerabilities privately as described in SECURITY.md. Changes are listed in CHANGELOG.md.

License

MIT (see LICENSE).


Made with ♥️ by tBelt.

Metadata

Release files for aepkit 0.7.6

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for aepkit 0.7.6
File Size Uploaded Provenance Actions
aepkit-0.7.6.tar.gz 105.0 kB With provenance Details for aepkit-0.7.6.tar.gz

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for aepkit 0.7.6
File Interpreter ABI Platform Actions
aepkit-0.7.6-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details for aepkit-0.7.6-py3-none-any.whl

Total release size: 164.3 kB

Release files / aepkit-0.7.6.tar.gz

Download URL aepkit-0.7.6.tar.gz
Size 105.0 kB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
40ab7837c8200703f390df86eb53d1641f182e351d3c6338f8fec56b69a6d7c9
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
d0c1452c2d08626de451fc9d35350d1c80ddcfb759dc2551ad07b2dd2da62dce
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.16

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Nov 8, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / aepkit-0.7.6-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL aepkit-0.7.6-py3-none-any.whl
Size 59.2 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
08dff6b7841c8670a68c257d7b1c4aa59b0d5724054451bda75e3c21bf117461
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
5f897b26d45f5d258ae5baf4a38df15997f50219a58adbfeb45e1394811938ad
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.16

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Nov 8, 2026.

Transparency log

Security for aepkit 0.7.6

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

Full provenance

Both files in this release have been uploaded with provenance metadata.

Select from 2 files

Attestation for aepkit-0.7.6.tar.gz

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Nov 8, 2026.

Transparency log

A note on package security

PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.

To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page