Bite checks whether an AI coding agent's "fixed" is actually true.
"Reverting the claimed fix and making the change prove itself under a real test is exactly the kind of check that should exist for every "fixed" commit."
When a commit says it fixed something, Bite writes one small test of that exact claim, runs it itself on the commit and on today's code, and shows the result only if a second, independent check agrees the test is fair. If the test fails, the "fixed" wasn't.
Try it in a minute
Install once with pipx, which gives Bite its own space so there's no venv to set up or activate:
python -m pip install --user pipx
python -m pipx ensurepath
Close the terminal window and open a new one, then:
pipx install bite-check
cd /path/to/your-repo
bite --free
bite now works in any terminal window. bite --free needs no key and costs nothing. It takes each recent
change back out, runs your tests, and lists the changes no test guards, plus any new test that still passes
without its commit's code (it tests nothing). If something it needs is missing, like git or pytest, it says
so and gives you the line that installs it. Each run ends with a one-page report, bite_proof/report.html, to open in your browser. To update Bite later: pipx upgrade bite-check.
To test the claims themselves (the paid step), add one extra package and set ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, then run bite:
pipx inject bite-check claude-agent-sdk
This step uses your own API key, and --budget caps what a run spends ($1 by default). It runs on Anthropic's
Agent SDK, so it needs an API key and never uses a Claude login or plan (Anthropic's Agent SDK rule:
https://code.claude.com/docs/en/agent-sdk/overview). The commits Bite checks can come from any coding AI or person.
Works with pytest, npm test, cargo test, go test and dotnet test. Settings and limits: AGENTS.md,
written so your coding AI (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Copilot) can set Bite up for you. To work on Bite itself: clone it, pip install -e .[test], then python -m pytest.
Run it on every pull request
Add this file to your repo as .github/workflows/bite.yml. On each pull request it runs the free check on that
pull request's commits and shows a pass or fail check next to your other CI. It fails when a commit's change
can be taken back out and your tests still pass. No key, no cost. It's also listed on the GitHub Marketplace as
Bite free check.
name: bite
on: pull_request
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: write
jobs:
bite:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}
fetch-depth: 0
# install what your tests need here, e.g. for Python:
- uses: actions/setup-python@v5
- run: python -m pip install pytest -r requirements.txt
- uses: connabyss/bite@v0.4.0
Options go under with:: args (extra bite options, e.g. --serious), max-commits (default 20),
fail-on-gap (set to false to report without failing) and comment (set to false for no comment). It posts one comment on the pull request that says, per
commit, whether a test noticed the change being taken out, and updates that same comment on later pushes. The
rerun steps for each flagged commit are on the job's summary page.
Bite-proof badge
When every change Bite checked had a test that noticed it, Bite ends with "Bite-proof. Nice work." and prints a badge line you can paste into your README:
Prefer a gentler wording for the warnings? bite --roast gives the same results, phrased differently.
The catch that shows what it's for
In fellowapp/prosemirror-py, commit 3614c96 (co-authored by Claude) says:
fix: add weakref callback to clean up resolve cache entries
The cache used dict keyed by id(doc) with no cleanup, causing a slow memory leak in long-running processes. Added a weakref finalizer callback that removes the cache entry when the doc is garbage collected.
Bite wrote this test of that claim and ran it:
def test_cache_entry_removed_after_doc_gc():
resolvedpos._resolve_cache.clear()
d = doc(p("hello"))
ResolvedPos.resolve_cached(d, 2)
assert len(resolvedpos._resolve_cache) == 1
del d
gc.collect()
assert len(resolvedpos._resolve_cache) == 0 # fails: 1 == 0
It fails on that commit and on today's code. The cache keeps each document alive through its cached positions, so the cleanup never runs. After 20,000 documents are resolved and dropped, the cache still holds all 20,000, using 35 MB. The commit looked right, read right, and passed its own tests. Reported with a repro in #335; a tested fix is open as #336.
Fixed or merged upstream
Each bug was reproduced with a standalone script in a clean environment before it was reported.
| Project | What happened |
|---|---|
| pyclibrary | 7 bugs reported in #92. All 7 fixes reviewed and merged: #93, #94, #95, #96, #97, #98, #99. The maintainer wrote: "Thanks for the small and focused PR very nice to review." |
| django-tailwind-cli | With one stylesheet, tailwind watch hid rebuild messages and build errors. Fix #232 merged and released in 4.8.2. The maintainer wrote: "Just about to release 4.8.2 with the fix included. Thanks for the contribution." |
| srptools | 4 bugs reported in #13. The maintainer fixed all 4 and closed it the same day. |
| resolve-robotics-uri-py | URI lookup depended on the hash seed (#26). Fixed by the maintainers in #27. The maintainer wrote: "Thanks a lot for the detailed issue report!" |
| text-to-cad | A Claude commit added a Python 3.11 syntax check that can't catch the exact bug it was written for (nested same-quote f-strings). Bite sent a test that does catch it, #708, was merged and released in 0.8.2; the maintainer then closed the remaining gaps in #712. |
| west | Loading a manifest from data with a reserved project name crashed. Fix #1013 approved by two maintainers and merged. |
| midea-lan | A message encoder got the frame length wrong when no padding was needed. Fix #251 merged. The maintainer wrote: "Thank you @connabyss for submitting this PR and for finding and fixing the 8370 framing bug." |
| mizani | Number labels picked too few decimals when values were close together ([0, 10, 10.5] showed as 10, 10). Fix #90 merged. The maintainer wrote: "@connabyss, thank you." |
| pamqp | Bite's free check found three past fixes that no test would notice breaking, including one where Basic.Reject(requeue=False) was flipped back to True. Tests for all three (#86) merged. |
Sent, waiting for review
| Project | Link | What happened |
|---|---|---|
| prosemirror-py | #335, #336, #337 | The leak above. A second Claude commit (1e3339e) let Mapping change a list the caller still owned; fix in #337. |
| python-vcr-tests | #18, #19 | A Claude commit said its database recorder captures every query; only the last per cursor is saved. |
| ChatSBOM | #217 | A Claude commit's stale-result guard is reset on every walk page, so a repo can be collected twice. |
| llm | #1828 | A Claude commit fixed per-turn tool ids in llm logs, but its test never made a tool call, so it passed even with the bug. |
| treg | #1237 | A Claude commit's test for an org header passes even with the fix removed, so it guards nothing. |
| claude-seo | #392 | A Claude commit's --release check let a value with a trailing newline through. |
| marshmallow-fastoneofschema | #1, #2, #3, #4 | 3 bugs, one fix each. |
| django-modeltranslation | #831 | Nested auto_populate() and fallbacks() blocks reset the setting to nothing on exit instead of restoring it. |
| mypy_boto3_builder | #395 | Reported, no reply yet. |
| drf-pydantic | #51 | Reported, no reply yet. |
Limits, plainly
- Most claims hold. Across all rounds so far, Bite tested 137 "fixed" claims that it could run tests for (all from commits made with Claude Code, the AI those rounds looked at). 8 were false (about 1 in 17), and 4 of those were still broken on today's code. On well-reviewed projects it usually finds nothing, and that's the right answer.
- Quiet is not a pass. Bite only shows a failing test that the second check calls fair and real. That second check has thrown out more than 10 failing tests that weren't. A claim that holds proves that one claim, not that the commit has no other bugs.
- It needs the project's tests to run. If they don't run on a clean copy, Bite can't check that commit.
- Bug hunting is weaker than claim checking. In a 10-project overnight hunt, two blind AI judges rated 21 of 22 proven fixes as real bugs and none as wrong, but Bite found only 1 of the 10 bugs the maintainers fixed soon after.
- Small samples, AI judges. The judges read code without running it. The human checks are the maintainers' fixes and merges listed above.
Contributing
Bug reports, fixes and AI-assisted PRs are all welcome. See CONTRIBUTING.md. If Bite flagged something wrongly, or missed a claim you know was false, please open an issue.
Thank you to Bite's first contributors:
- @snehaapratap made the setup error messages point to steps that exist (#18).
- @gauravjangra3165 added macOS to the tests (#19).
- @bfs2021 made the "check it yourself" steps work for commits that add a new file (#37, fixing #27).
MIT licensed.
Metadata
Release files for bite-check 0.4.1
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | Provenance | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bite_check-0.4.1.tar.gz | 49.0 kB | With provenance | Details for bite_check-0.4.1.tar.gz |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Actions Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bite_check-0.4.1-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details for bite_check-0.4.1-py3-none-any.whl |
Total release size: 93.5 kB
Release files / bite_check-0.4.1.tar.gz
| Download URL | bite_check-0.4.1.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 49.0 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
565b60252a7d12c32ebee610d9d049487d9e780f9d4d8c4ffdb1b7b4ed5d1b54
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
ddfcf14c34afc108a57f8fa0297ddb8c635f0a39ee7d0b72e06fa31bce3de0d6
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.16
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 30, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / bite_check-0.4.1-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | bite_check-0.4.1-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 44.5 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
ca18ea68fd56c6e9ee64fe084cff819ebe1f1afe36bf015156ce362d7c1adb25
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
886dbcbd0aa48246a9ab3d3158f661a5e4993b9c831870c5f2122e81a12f9b27
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.16
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 30, 2026.
Transparency logSecurity for bite-check 0.4.1
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
Full provenance
All 2 files in this release have been uploaded with provenance metadata.
Attestation for bite_check-0.4.1.tar.gz
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 30, 2026.
Transparency logA note on package security
PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.
To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.