Skip to main content

Bite

GitHub Marketplace

Bite checks whether an AI coding agent's "fixed" is actually true.

"Reverting the claimed fix and making the change prove itself under a real test is exactly the kind of check that should exist for every "fixed" commit."

— Ivan Zdravkov, on DEV

When a commit says it fixed something, Bite writes one small test of that exact claim, runs it itself on the commit and on today's code, and shows the result only if a second, independent check agrees the test is fair. If the test fails, the "fixed" wasn't.

Try it in a minute

Install once with pipx, which gives Bite its own space so there's no venv to set up or activate:

python -m pip install --user pipx
python -m pipx ensurepath

Close the terminal window and open a new one, then:

pipx install bite-check
bite --demo

bite --demo builds a tiny made-up shop project in a temporary folder and runs the free check on it. Two of its commits say they fixed something: one added a test for its fix, the other didn't. Bite takes each fix back out and runs the tests, and you see the difference:

  9661edcf ✅ noticed by test_discount_never_below_zero Fix discounts over 100% making the price negative
  e5c329ec ⚠️ NO TEST NOTICED           Fix totals showing long decimals like 0.30000000000000004

It needs nothing besides git, takes a few seconds, and doesn't touch your files. Then try it on your own project:

cd /path/to/your-repo
bite --free

bite now works in any terminal window. bite --free needs no key and costs nothing. It takes each recent change back out, runs your tests, and lists the changes no test guards, plus any new test that still passes without its commit's code (it tests nothing). If something it needs is missing, like git or pytest, it says so and gives you the line that installs it. Each run ends with a one-page report, bite_proof/report.html, to open in your browser. To update Bite later: pipx upgrade bite-check.

To test the claims themselves (the paid step), add one extra package and set ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, then run bite:

pipx inject bite-check claude-agent-sdk

This step uses your own API key, and --budget caps what a run spends ($1 by default). It runs on Anthropic's Agent SDK, so it needs an API key and never uses a Claude login or plan (Anthropic's Agent SDK rule: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/agent-sdk/overview). The commits Bite checks can come from any coding AI or person.

Works with pytest, npm test, cargo test, go test and dotnet test. Settings and limits: AGENTS.md, written so your coding AI (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Copilot) can set Bite up for you. To work on Bite itself: clone it, pip install -e .[test], then python -m pytest.

Run it on every pull request

Easiest: install the bite-check app on the repos you want. Within an hour it opens one issue there with an "Add Bite" link that fills in the file below for you; you read it and click Commit changes. The app can only open issues: it can't read or change your code or workflows.

Or add this file to your repo yourself as .github/workflows/bite.yml. On each pull request it runs the free check on that pull request's commits and shows a pass or fail check next to your other CI. It fails when a commit's change can be taken back out and your tests still pass. No key, no cost. It's also listed on the GitHub Marketplace as Bite free check.

name: bite
on: pull_request
permissions:
  contents: read
  pull-requests: write
jobs:
  bite:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
        with:
          ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}
          fetch-depth: 0
      # install what your tests need here, e.g. for Python:
      - uses: actions/setup-python@v5
      - run: python -m pip install pytest -r requirements.txt
      - uses: connabyss/bite@v0.5.1

Options go under with:: args (extra bite options, e.g. --serious), max-commits (default 20), fail-on-gap (set to false to report without failing) and comment (set to false for no comment). It posts one comment on the pull request that says, per commit, whether a test noticed the change being taken out, and updates that same comment on later pushes. The rerun steps for each flagged commit are on the job's summary page.

Bite-proof badge

When every change Bite checked had a test that noticed it, Bite ends with "Bite-proof. Nice work." and prints a badge line you can paste into your README:

Bite-proof ✅

Prefer a gentler wording for the warnings? bite --roast gives the same results, phrased differently.

Famous repos Bite has checked

Project Language Changes checked Noticed by a test Real gaps
Rich Python 40 15 1 small: <kbd> keys in Markdown
Click Python 40 30 1 small: help on custom setting types
qs JavaScript 40 40 none ✅

Checked Oct 30, 2026 with bite --free. Every bug fix Bite could check had a test. We read each unnoticed change by hand. Apart from the gaps above, they were things a test can't catch, like type hints, speed-ups, Windows-only code or rewrites that work the same.

The catch that shows what it's for

In fellowapp/prosemirror-py, commit 3614c96 (co-authored by Claude) says:

fix: add weakref callback to clean up resolve cache entries

The cache used dict keyed by id(doc) with no cleanup, causing a slow memory leak in long-running processes. Added a weakref finalizer callback that removes the cache entry when the doc is garbage collected.

Bite wrote this test of that claim and ran it:

def test_cache_entry_removed_after_doc_gc():
    resolvedpos._resolve_cache.clear()
    d = doc(p("hello"))
    ResolvedPos.resolve_cached(d, 2)
    assert len(resolvedpos._resolve_cache) == 1
    del d
    gc.collect()
    assert len(resolvedpos._resolve_cache) == 0   # fails: 1 == 0

It fails on that commit and on today's code. The cache keeps each document alive through its cached positions, so the cleanup never runs. After 20,000 documents are resolved and dropped, the cache still holds all 20,000, using 35 MB. The commit looked right, read right, and passed its own tests. Reported with a repro in #335; a tested fix is open as #336.

Fixed or merged upstream

Each bug was reproduced with a standalone script in a clean environment before it was reported.

Project What happened
pyclibrary 7 bugs reported in #92. All 7 fixes reviewed and merged: #93, #94, #95, #96, #97, #98, #99. The maintainer wrote: "Thanks for the small and focused PR very nice to review."
django-tailwind-cli With one stylesheet, tailwind watch hid rebuild messages and build errors. Fix #232 merged and released in 4.8.2. The maintainer wrote: "Just about to release 4.8.2 with the fix included. Thanks for the contribution."
srptools 4 bugs reported in #13. The maintainer fixed all 4 and closed it the same day.
resolve-robotics-uri-py URI lookup depended on the hash seed (#26). Fixed by the maintainers in #27. The maintainer wrote: "Thanks a lot for the detailed issue report!"
text-to-cad A Claude commit added a Python 3.11 syntax check that can't catch the exact bug it was written for (nested same-quote f-strings). Bite sent a test that does catch it, #708, was merged and released in 0.8.2; the maintainer then closed the remaining gaps in #712.
west Loading a manifest from data with a reserved project name crashed. Fix #1013 approved by two maintainers and merged.
midea-lan A message encoder got the frame length wrong when no padding was needed. Fix #251 merged. The maintainer wrote: "Thank you @connabyss for submitting this PR and for finding and fixing the 8370 framing bug."
mizani Number labels picked too few decimals when values were close together ([0, 10, 10.5] showed as 10, 10). Fix #90 merged. The maintainer wrote: "@connabyss, thank you."
pamqp Bite's free check found three past fixes that no test would notice breaking, including one where Basic.Reject(requeue=False) was flipped back to True. Tests for all three (#86) merged.

Sent, waiting for review

Project Link What happened
prosemirror-py #335, #336, #337 The leak above. A second Claude commit (1e3339e) let Mapping change a list the caller still owned; fix in #337.
python-vcr-tests #18, #19 A Claude commit said its database recorder captures every query; only the last per cursor is saved.
ChatSBOM #217 A Claude commit's stale-result guard is reset on every walk page, so a repo can be collected twice.
llm #1828 A Claude commit fixed per-turn tool ids in llm logs, but its test never made a tool call, so it passed even with the bug.
treg #1237 A Claude commit's test for an org header passes even with the fix removed, so it guards nothing.
claude-seo #392 A Claude commit's --release check let a value with a trailing newline through.
marshmallow-fastoneofschema #1, #2, #3, #4 3 bugs, one fix each.
django-modeltranslation #831 Nested auto_populate() and fallbacks() blocks reset the setting to nothing on exit instead of restoring it.
mypy_boto3_builder #395 Reported, no reply yet.
drf-pydantic #51 Reported, no reply yet.

Limits, plainly

  • Most claims hold. Across all rounds so far, Bite tested 137 "fixed" claims that it could run tests for (all from commits made with Claude Code, the AI those rounds looked at). 8 were false (about 1 in 17), and 4 of those were still broken on today's code. On well-reviewed projects it usually finds nothing, and that's the right answer.
  • Quiet is not a pass. Bite only shows a failing test that the second check calls fair and real. That second check has thrown out more than 10 failing tests that weren't. A claim that holds proves that one claim, not that the commit has no other bugs.
  • It needs the project's tests to run. If they don't run on a clean copy, Bite can't check that commit.
  • Bug hunting is weaker than claim checking. In a 10-project overnight hunt, two blind AI judges rated 21 of 22 proven fixes as real bugs and none as wrong, but Bite found only 1 of the 10 bugs the maintainers fixed soon after.
  • Small samples, AI judges. The judges read code without running it. The human checks are the maintainers' fixes and merges listed above.

Contributing

Bug reports, fixes and AI-assisted PRs are all welcome. See CONTRIBUTING.md. If Bite flagged something wrongly, or missed a claim you know was false, please open an issue.

Thank you to Bite's first contributors:

MIT licensed.

Metadata

Release files for bite-check 0.5.1

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for bite-check 0.5.1
File Size Uploaded Provenance Actions
bite_check-0.5.1.tar.gz 55.0 kB With provenance Details for bite_check-0.5.1.tar.gz

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for bite-check 0.5.1
File Interpreter ABI Platform Actions
bite_check-0.5.1-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details for bite_check-0.5.1-py3-none-any.whl

Total release size: 101.7 kB

Release files / bite_check-0.5.1.tar.gz

Download URL bite_check-0.5.1.tar.gz
Size 55.0 kB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
1f2b65f0abe31ef6f00d5c1cb9aa1602ade486ec77afa97625f497f5a20ae7c3
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
d5407c15fe4b1269f7f881d636fb6126d3040b156c0db1f752375dc3374ea103
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.16

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 31, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / bite_check-0.5.1-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL bite_check-0.5.1-py3-none-any.whl
Size 46.7 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
def00eb9cb358f7d45af22dc0363a23a5bae2d5a0fc3a916d8821ede258c4ac3
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
6e4b4b9281de3fc315ff1b5c19cfbb8ed71fe54d4fb7a05c4d806edb1c4d732a
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.16

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 31, 2026.

Transparency log

Security for bite-check 0.5.1

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

Full provenance

All 2 files in this release have been uploaded with provenance metadata.

Select from 2 files

Attestation for bite_check-0.5.1.tar.gz

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 31, 2026.

Transparency log

A note on package security

PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.

To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page