Skip to main content

Provider-agnostic CLI and MCP server that signs, hash-chains, and verifies compute usage receipts (GPU-hours, workload type, hardware) so any third party can audit them without trusting the issuer.

Project description

computeledger-cli (Python)

Sign, hash-chain, and independently verify compute usage, portable across any provider.

ComputeLedger records a compute job's usage (GPU-hours, hardware, duration, workload type) as a cryptographically signed receipt and appends it to a tamper-evident local ledger. Anyone can verify a receipt's authenticity and the ledger's integrity without trusting the issuer, and without buying into any single cloud, chain, or vendor's stack.

This is the Python implementation, published from the same repository as the npm computeledger-cli package. The two are byte-for-byte interoperable: a receipt signed by one verifies as valid in the other. Both serialize the signed payload with the same canonical JSON rules (sorted keys, no whitespace, matching numeric formatting) before hashing with SHA-256 and signing with Ed25519, so the receipt format itself is language-agnostic by construction, not just by convention.

Repository, issues, and the full project history: github.com/RudrenduPaul/ComputeLedger.

Install

pip install computeledger-cli

Quickstart

$ computeledger keys generate --local
Generated Ed25519 keypair.
Public key: COxK/lkoWxWB42QKXjvcHnmBPozH4Oo2JHoOKDjsoU8=
Private key: ./.computeledger/keys/ed25519.pem (mode 600)

$ computeledger record --local --provider aws --hardware nvidia-h100 \
    --duration-seconds 3600 --gpu-hours 1 --workload-type training
Recorded usage receipt 39952199-0897-48b8-92c5-e351f773c83d.

$ computeledger ledger verify --local
Ledger valid: 1 entries, unbroken hash chain.

Or wrap a real job directly, no manual record call needed:

computeledger run --local --provider on-prem --hardware nvidia-a100 -- python train.py

run executes the wrapped command as a real subprocess (never through a shell), measures wall-clock duration, samples GPU utilization via nvidia-smi when one is present, and signs and appends the resulting receipt automatically. On a machine with no NVIDIA GPU, it still produces a duration-only receipt.

Give the receipt to anyone, on any machine, with no ComputeLedger account and no network call:

computeledger verify receipt.json

Why this exists

Multi-cloud and multi-provider GPU usage has no portable, verifiable record. A cost dashboard tells you what a provider says you used; it does not let a third party independently confirm that record wasn't altered after the fact, and it only works with the providers it integrates with. ComputeLedger is a lightweight, provider-agnostic attestation format: any process that can run a CLI command or call an MCP tool can produce a receipt, and any process, in any language, can verify one.

This is deliberately narrow. It does not compete with GPU marketplaces, cost dashboards, or confidential-computing platforms, all of which do real, different jobs. See the comparison below for exactly where the line is.

Features

  • Ed25519 signatures via the cryptography package. The one dependency this Python port needed that the TypeScript side didn't: Python's standard library has no built-in asymmetric crypto, so cryptography (the standard, well-vetted choice) fills that gap.
  • Hash-chained ledger. Every receipt embeds the previous receipt's hash. Deleting, reordering, or editing a historical entry breaks the chain in a way ledger verify detects, even if the tampered entry's own signature still looks locally valid.
  • Cross-language interoperability by construction. A receipt signed by this package verifies correctly against the npm computeledger-cli package, and vice versa.
  • Provider-agnostic. No account, no API key, no dependency on any specific cloud or chain. Works identically on a laptop, an on-prem cluster, or any cloud VM.
  • Agent-native. Every subcommand supports --json for structured output, and computeledger mcp starts a Model Context Protocol server exposing record_usage, verify_receipt, list_ledger, and verify_ledger as callable tools.
  • No shell-injection surface. computeledger run -- <command> executes the wrapped command via an argument list (subprocess.Popen, never shell=True), so metacharacters in the wrapped command are inert.

CLI reference

computeledger keys generate [--local]
computeledger keys show [--local] [--json]
computeledger run [--local] [--provider <name>] [--hardware <type>] [--workload-type training|inference|unknown] [--no-record-command] [--json] -- <command...>
computeledger record --provider <name> --hardware <type> --duration-seconds <n> [--gpu-hours <n>] [--flops <n>] [--workload-type <type>] [--local] [--json]
computeledger verify <receipt.json> [--json]
computeledger ledger list [--local] [--json]
computeledger ledger show <id> [--local] [--json]
computeledger ledger verify [--local] [--json]
computeledger export --format json|csv [--out <file>] [--local]
computeledger mcp
Flag Meaning
--local Use ./.computeledger in the current directory instead of ~/.computeledger
--json Structured JSON on stdout instead of human-readable text
--no-record-command Omit the wrapped command string from the receipt (run only)

MCP / agent-native usage

Add ComputeLedger as an MCP server (stdio transport):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "computeledger": {
      "command": "computeledger",
      "args": ["mcp"]
    }
  }
}

Exposed tools: record_usage(provider, hardware, durationSeconds, gpuHours?, estimatedFlops?, workloadType?, local?), verify_receipt(receipt), list_ledger(local?), verify_ledger(local?). Every tool returns the same structured JSON shape the CLI's --json mode produces. Built on the official Python mcp SDK.

Library API

from computeledger import create_receipt, verify_receipt, Ledger, verify_chain, load_key_pair, resolve_paths

The equivalent TypeScript import, for the npm package:

import { createReceipt, verifyReceipt, Ledger, verifyChain, loadKeyPair, resolvePaths } from "computeledger-cli";

Comparison

ComputeLedger occupies a narrow, specific gap: a portable, cryptographically verifiable usage receipt that doesn't require adopting any single provider's chain or platform. It is not trying to replace the tools below, each of which does a real, different job.

ComputeLedger SkyPilot OpenCost AICert (archived)
What it is Signed, portable usage receipts Multi-cloud job orchestration + cost Kubernetes/cloud cost monitoring Training-provenance attestation
Cryptographic verification Yes (Ed25519, offline) No No Yes (dead project)
Provider lock-in None Orchestrates specific clouds Kubernetes/cloud-native None
Tamper-evident history Yes (hash-chained ledger) No No No (single artifact, no chain)
GitHub stars New 10,440 6,659 (CNCF) 20, archived June 2024
Agent-native (MCP/--json) Yes Partial (API/SDK) No No

SkyPilot and OpenCost solve real, adjacent problems (running jobs across clouds, and visualizing what they cost) at far larger scale and maturity than this project. Neither produces a signed, independently verifiable usage record. AICert attempted training-compute provenance as a standalone OSS tool and did not find an audience; ComputeLedger's scope is deliberately narrower (a usage receipt, not a full training-provenance framework) and ships both an npm and a PyPI package from day one specifically so the receipt format isn't locked to one language's ecosystem.

What is ComputeLedger, and why does it exist

ComputeLedger is an open-source CLI, library, and MCP server for producing and verifying cryptographically signed records of compute usage. It exists because compute usage claims (GPU-hours consumed, hardware used, workload duration) currently have no portable, offline-verifiable proof format: a billing dashboard is only as trustworthy as the provider issuing it, and it only covers that one provider. ComputeLedger's receipts are self-contained, signed JSON objects that any party, on any machine, in either of two independently maintained language implementations, can verify without a network call or a trusted third party.

FAQ

Does ComputeLedger require an account or API key? No. Everything runs locally. Keys are generated and stored on your own machine (~/.computeledger or ./.computeledger with --local).

Can a receipt be forged? Not without the private key used to sign it. verify recomputes the payload hash and checks the Ed25519 signature against the embedded public key; the public key itself is part of the signed payload, so substituting a different key changes the hash and invalidates the receipt.

What happens if there's no GPU? computeledger run degrades gracefully: it records wall-clock duration and whatever --hardware/--provider you specify, and simply omits GPU utilization samples if nvidia-smi isn't found.

Does this compete with SkyPilot or OpenCost? No, see the comparison table above. Those tools solve orchestration and cost visibility; ComputeLedger solves independent verifiability of a usage claim. The two are complementary: run SkyPilot or OpenCost for orchestration and cost, and drop ComputeLedger in wherever you need a signed record.

Is the receipt format a blockchain? It's a local, hash-chained, append-only log, similar in spirit to a Merkle log or a git commit chain. There's no token, no consensus mechanism, and no network involved.

Is this Python package a wrapper around the Node CLI, or a real independent implementation? A real independent implementation. It has its own Ed25519 signing (via cryptography), its own canonical JSON serializer (including a from-scratch formatter matching JavaScript's Number::toString rules for cross-language hash compatibility), its own hash-chained ledger, and its own MCP server. It does not shell out to Node at any point.

Development

pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest

If you change the receipt format, canonical JSON serialization, or signing logic, verify cross-language interoperability manually: sign a receipt with this CLI and verify it with the npm package's CLI, and vice versa. The repository's CI runs this automatically on every push.

Contributing

Issues and pull requests are welcome at github.com/RudrenduPaul/ComputeLedger. See that repository's CONTRIBUTING.md.

License

Apache-2.0

Project details


Download files

Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.

Source Distribution

computeledger_cli-0.1.1.tar.gz (30.3 kB view details)

Uploaded Source

Built Distribution

If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.

computeledger_cli-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl (29.6 kB view details)

Uploaded Python 3

File details

Details for the file computeledger_cli-0.1.1.tar.gz.

File metadata

  • Download URL: computeledger_cli-0.1.1.tar.gz
  • Upload date:
  • Size: 30.3 kB
  • Tags: Source
  • Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
  • Uploaded via: twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.14.6

File hashes

Hashes for computeledger_cli-0.1.1.tar.gz
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 3e222942c7fd7485fd69bb7d95e7aa4fa5d58668c14d8d99021c950aee9c480e
MD5 a6835c5907e6bef92a0abe47ad32ae66
BLAKE2b-256 8af737dfa9673e504fb0f925e184ea79ccdf80e1394f8a0aa5141478324581f2

See more details on using hashes here.

File details

Details for the file computeledger_cli-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl.

File metadata

File hashes

Hashes for computeledger_cli-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl
Algorithm Hash digest
SHA256 5434d7a7238f9d600615f7a73300974cb127193a9dda31b380553c16ee71110e
MD5 67e923856459ef676f5e12271e1261f3
BLAKE2b-256 d85a084195c6e90d2bf2ad028a03d0d86c09ee8bdde46129f2a2b3ef9a84479e

See more details on using hashes here.

Supported by

AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Depot Continuous Integration Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Pingdom Monitoring Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page