Provider-agnostic CLI and MCP server that signs, hash-chains, and verifies compute usage receipts (GPU-hours, workload type, hardware) so any third party can audit them without trusting the issuer.
Project description
computeledger-cli (Python)
Sign, hash-chain, and independently verify compute usage, portable across any provider.
ComputeLedger records a compute job's usage (GPU-hours, hardware, duration, workload type) as a cryptographically signed receipt and appends it to a tamper-evident local ledger. Anyone can verify a receipt's authenticity and the ledger's integrity without trusting the issuer, and without buying into any single cloud, chain, or vendor's stack.
This is the Python implementation, published from the same repository as the npm computeledger-cli package. The two are byte-for-byte interoperable: a receipt signed by one verifies as valid in the other. Both serialize the signed payload with the same canonical JSON rules (sorted keys, no whitespace, matching numeric formatting) before hashing with SHA-256 and signing with Ed25519, so the receipt format itself is language-agnostic by construction, not just by convention.
Repository, issues, and the full project history: github.com/RudrenduPaul/ComputeLedger.
Install
pip install computeledger-cli
Quickstart
$ computeledger keys generate --local
Generated Ed25519 keypair.
Public key: COxK/lkoWxWB42QKXjvcHnmBPozH4Oo2JHoOKDjsoU8=
Private key: ./.computeledger/keys/ed25519.pem (mode 600)
$ computeledger record --local --provider aws --hardware nvidia-h100 \
--duration-seconds 3600 --gpu-hours 1 --workload-type training
Recorded usage receipt 39952199-0897-48b8-92c5-e351f773c83d.
$ computeledger ledger verify --local
Ledger valid: 1 entries, unbroken hash chain.
Or wrap a real job directly, no manual record call needed:
computeledger run --local --provider on-prem --hardware nvidia-a100 -- python train.py
run executes the wrapped command as a real subprocess (never through a shell), measures wall-clock duration, samples GPU utilization via nvidia-smi when one is present, and signs and appends the resulting receipt automatically. On a machine with no NVIDIA GPU, it still produces a duration-only receipt.
Give the receipt to anyone, on any machine, with no ComputeLedger account and no network call:
computeledger verify receipt.json
Why this exists
Multi-cloud and multi-provider GPU usage has no portable, verifiable record. A cost dashboard tells you what a provider says you used; it does not let a third party independently confirm that record wasn't altered after the fact, and it only works with the providers it integrates with. ComputeLedger is a lightweight, provider-agnostic attestation format: any process that can run a CLI command or call an MCP tool can produce a receipt, and any process, in any language, can verify one.
This is deliberately narrow. It does not compete with GPU marketplaces, cost dashboards, or confidential-computing platforms, all of which do real, different jobs. See the comparison below for exactly where the line is.
Features
- Ed25519 signatures via the
cryptographypackage. The one dependency this Python port needed that the TypeScript side didn't: Python's standard library has no built-in asymmetric crypto, socryptography(the standard, well-vetted choice) fills that gap. - Hash-chained ledger. Every receipt embeds the previous receipt's hash. Deleting, reordering, or editing a historical entry breaks the chain in a way
ledger verifydetects, even if the tampered entry's own signature still looks locally valid. - Cross-language interoperability by construction. A receipt signed by this package verifies correctly against the npm
computeledger-clipackage, and vice versa. - Provider-agnostic. No account, no API key, no dependency on any specific cloud or chain. Works identically on a laptop, an on-prem cluster, or any cloud VM.
- Agent-native. Every subcommand supports
--jsonfor structured output, andcomputeledger mcpstarts a Model Context Protocol server exposingrecord_usage,verify_receipt,list_ledger, andverify_ledgeras callable tools. - No shell-injection surface.
computeledger run -- <command>executes the wrapped command via an argument list (subprocess.Popen, nevershell=True), so metacharacters in the wrapped command are inert.
CLI reference
computeledger keys generate [--local]
computeledger keys show [--local] [--json]
computeledger run [--local] [--provider <name>] [--hardware <type>] [--workload-type training|inference|unknown] [--no-record-command] [--json] -- <command...>
computeledger record --provider <name> --hardware <type> --duration-seconds <n> [--gpu-hours <n>] [--flops <n>] [--workload-type <type>] [--local] [--json]
computeledger verify <receipt.json> [--json]
computeledger ledger list [--local] [--json]
computeledger ledger show <id> [--local] [--json]
computeledger ledger verify [--local] [--json]
computeledger export --format json|csv [--out <file>] [--local]
computeledger mcp
| Flag | Meaning |
|---|---|
--local |
Use ./.computeledger in the current directory instead of ~/.computeledger |
--json |
Structured JSON on stdout instead of human-readable text |
--no-record-command |
Omit the wrapped command string from the receipt (run only) |
MCP / agent-native usage
Add ComputeLedger as an MCP server (stdio transport):
{
"mcpServers": {
"computeledger": {
"command": "computeledger",
"args": ["mcp"]
}
}
}
Exposed tools: record_usage(provider, hardware, durationSeconds, gpuHours?, estimatedFlops?, workloadType?, local?), verify_receipt(receipt), list_ledger(local?), verify_ledger(local?). Every tool returns the same structured JSON shape the CLI's --json mode produces. Built on the official Python mcp SDK.
Library API
from computeledger import create_receipt, verify_receipt, Ledger, verify_chain, load_key_pair, resolve_paths
The equivalent TypeScript import, for the npm package:
import { createReceipt, verifyReceipt, Ledger, verifyChain, loadKeyPair, resolvePaths } from "computeledger-cli";
Comparison
ComputeLedger occupies a narrow, specific gap: a portable, cryptographically verifiable usage receipt that doesn't require adopting any single provider's chain or platform. It is not trying to replace the tools below, each of which does a real, different job.
| ComputeLedger | SkyPilot | OpenCost | AICert (archived) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | Signed, portable usage receipts | Multi-cloud job orchestration + cost | Kubernetes/cloud cost monitoring | Training-provenance attestation |
| Cryptographic verification | Yes (Ed25519, offline) | No | No | Yes (dead project) |
| Provider lock-in | None | Orchestrates specific clouds | Kubernetes/cloud-native | None |
| Tamper-evident history | Yes (hash-chained ledger) | No | No | No (single artifact, no chain) |
| GitHub stars | New | 10,440 | 6,659 (CNCF) | 20, archived June 2024 |
Agent-native (MCP/--json) |
Yes | Partial (API/SDK) | No | No |
SkyPilot and OpenCost solve real, adjacent problems (running jobs across clouds, and visualizing what they cost) at far larger scale and maturity than this project. Neither produces a signed, independently verifiable usage record. AICert attempted training-compute provenance as a standalone OSS tool and did not find an audience; ComputeLedger's scope is deliberately narrower (a usage receipt, not a full training-provenance framework) and ships both an npm and a PyPI package from day one specifically so the receipt format isn't locked to one language's ecosystem.
What is ComputeLedger, and why does it exist
ComputeLedger is an open-source CLI, library, and MCP server for producing and verifying cryptographically signed records of compute usage. It exists because compute usage claims (GPU-hours consumed, hardware used, workload duration) currently have no portable, offline-verifiable proof format: a billing dashboard is only as trustworthy as the provider issuing it, and it only covers that one provider. ComputeLedger's receipts are self-contained, signed JSON objects that any party, on any machine, in either of two independently maintained language implementations, can verify without a network call or a trusted third party.
FAQ
Does ComputeLedger require an account or API key?
No. Everything runs locally. Keys are generated and stored on your own machine (~/.computeledger or ./.computeledger with --local).
Can a receipt be forged?
Not without the private key used to sign it. verify recomputes the payload hash and checks the Ed25519 signature against the embedded public key; the public key itself is part of the signed payload, so substituting a different key changes the hash and invalidates the receipt.
What happens if there's no GPU?
computeledger run degrades gracefully: it records wall-clock duration and whatever --hardware/--provider you specify, and simply omits GPU utilization samples if nvidia-smi isn't found.
Does this compete with SkyPilot or OpenCost? No, see the comparison table above. Those tools solve orchestration and cost visibility; ComputeLedger solves independent verifiability of a usage claim. The two are complementary: run SkyPilot or OpenCost for orchestration and cost, and drop ComputeLedger in wherever you need a signed record.
Is the receipt format a blockchain? It's a local, hash-chained, append-only log, similar in spirit to a Merkle log or a git commit chain. There's no token, no consensus mechanism, and no network involved.
Is this Python package a wrapper around the Node CLI, or a real independent implementation?
A real independent implementation. It has its own Ed25519 signing (via cryptography), its own canonical JSON serializer (including a from-scratch formatter matching JavaScript's Number::toString rules for cross-language hash compatibility), its own hash-chained ledger, and its own MCP server. It does not shell out to Node at any point.
Development
pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest
If you change the receipt format, canonical JSON serialization, or signing logic, verify cross-language interoperability manually: sign a receipt with this CLI and verify it with the npm package's CLI, and vice versa. The repository's CI runs this automatically on every push.
Contributing
Issues and pull requests are welcome at github.com/RudrenduPaul/ComputeLedger. See that repository's CONTRIBUTING.md.
License
Project details
Release history Release notifications | RSS feed
Download files
Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.
Source Distribution
Built Distribution
Filter files by name, interpreter, ABI, and platform.
If you're not sure about the file name format, learn more about wheel file names.
Copy a direct link to the current filters
File details
Details for the file computeledger_cli-0.1.0.tar.gz.
File metadata
- Download URL: computeledger_cli-0.1.0.tar.gz
- Upload date:
- Size: 30.3 kB
- Tags: Source
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
- Uploaded via: twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.14.6
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
8373cfae43832471c0630b237ecfb6b798338f5a181a4dfca7ad7cf1bad0abf4
|
|
| MD5 |
4619c5354cab23afd73dfcbd21022371
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
ca9f7477406797475167bc60d8f23c9e8412cd46dd158bee9f2842fdec2fdaac
|
File details
Details for the file computeledger_cli-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl.
File metadata
- Download URL: computeledger_cli-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl
- Upload date:
- Size: 29.6 kB
- Tags: Python 3
- Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? No
- Uploaded via: twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.14.6
File hashes
| Algorithm | Hash digest | |
|---|---|---|
| SHA256 |
ee1c18c02fbc4ecaed5f2e98abb0b7697a4bdf9ec4f15ad1bfa8fdaac19c3ea0
|
|
| MD5 |
df8ed8743337389932bf9b74a05ea13b
|
|
| BLAKE2b-256 |
4c2987c5ed3db1342c3c36d3e859e5ff7f6b89cc3a7392e7307099a34874013d
|