evaltrack

Evals are tests. They belong in your test suite, running in CI and gating your pull requests.

Documentation: evaltrack.jesravnbol.dk

evaltrack is a pytest plugin that gates and tracks your evals, and handles LLM flakiness without rerunning CI. Your evals run in the pytest suite and CI pipeline that you already have, with the eval runner you already use. Mark a test with @pytest.mark.evaltrack and hand it the eval:

import evaltrack


@pytest.mark.evaltrack(score_bars={"helpfulness": 0.8}, flake_reruns=2)
def test_support_agent() -> None:
    ...
    evaltrack.run(dataset.evaluate_sync, support_task)

That one marker gives you three things:

• Gate on assertions and scores. Keep using your existing eval runner and evaltrack turns your runner's assertions into a pass/fail gate, so a failing case fails the test. It also adds score bars. Most runners record a numeric score without judging it, and a bar turns that score into a gate that fails any case under it. See The evaltrack marker.
• Handle flakiness without rerunning CI. LLM output is nondeterministic, so evaltrack lets you rerun only the evals that fail (not the whole CI pipeline) and track each case's pass-rate over time. See Flakiness & reliability.
• Keep every run. Runs land in a repository you own (local files, or Azure Blob Storage or Amazon S3 as the remote), with a dashboard you run locally to inspect them and compare them across PRs and releases. Over the mainline (the runs you have promoted) it tracks each case's pass-rate and each score, so changes in quality that never trip the gate are still visible. You can save any run as a standalone HTML file that opens anywhere, to share or attach to a CI job. See Repositories and storage and CI/CD.

pydantic-evals and DeepEval are supported out of the box. Another runner that fits the overall shape needs a small translator (Eval runners).

What you end up with

flowchart LR
    dev["Write evals<br/>@pytest.mark.evaltrack"] --> run["pytest -m evaltrack<br/>→ a recorded run"]
    run --> ui["evaltrack ui<br/>browse + diff"]
    run -->|open PR| pr["CI: push pr/N"]
    pr -->|merge| base["CI: promote → baseline"]
    base -.->|review against baseline| ui

Quickstart

uv add "evaltrack[ui,pydantic-evals]" "pydantic-ai-slim[openai]"

The ui extra is the dashboard, pydantic-evals is the runner this example uses, and pydantic-ai is the agent framework. evaltrack does not require them but the quickstart uses them.

Add @pytest.mark.evaltrack to a test and hand the eval to evaltrack.run():

import pytest
from pydantic_ai import Agent
from pydantic_evals import Case, Dataset
from pydantic_evals.evaluators import LLMJudge

import evaltrack


@pytest.mark.evaltrack(score_bars={"helpfulness": 0.8}, flake_reruns=2)
def test_support_agent() -> None:
    agent = Agent(
        "openai:gpt-4o-mini",
        instructions=(
            "Support the Snapwombat photo app. Deleted photos are restorable from "
            "Settings > Backups for 30 days. Never promise or rule out a refund. Send "
            "billing questions to support@snapwombat.example."
        ),
    )

    async def support_task(prompt: str) -> str:
        return (await agent.run(prompt)).output

    dataset = Dataset(
        name="snapwombat-support",
        cases=[
            Case(name="refund-demand", inputs="The app deleted my photos. I want my money back!"),
            Case(name="restore-backup", inputs="How do I restore a backup?"),
        ],
        evaluators=[
            # An assertion: must be true, or the case fails.
            LLMJudge(rubric="The reply neither promises nor rules out a refund", include_input=True),
            # A score, gated at 0.8 by the marker's score bar.
            LLMJudge(
                rubric=(
                    "Rate how helpful and clear the reply is, from 0.0 to 1.0. "
                    "Declining to promise a refund is not unhelpful."
                ),
                include_input=True,
                score={"evaluation_name": "helpfulness", "include_reason": True},
                assertion=False,
            ),
        ],
    )

    # The marker gates here: a failed assertion, or a score under 0.8, fails the test.
    # `flake_reruns=2` runs the eval again while a case is failing, up to twice.
    evaltrack.run(dataset.evaluate_sync, support_task)

pytest -m evaltrack runs your evals and records a run, and evaltrack ui opens the dashboard on it. The agent and the judges call a real model, so this test needs OPENAI_API_KEY. The examples run without one.

Getting started walks through this example step by step, from the install to a shared remote, and Eval runners does the same with DeepEval.

Compatibility

evaltrack is pre-1.0, so breaking changes can happen and the changelog will say so. What I intend to keep stable: the names import evaltrack exports, evaltrack.translators.register and the Translator protocol, the marker kwargs, the CLI commands and flags and what its exit codes mean, the [tool.evaltrack] keys, and the stored run JSON, where fields may be added but keep their meaning.

Planned additions are in a rough roadmap.