finances
See where your money goes from your own bank statements and exports. No bank login, no Plaid, no account linking, no cloud. Everything runs on your machine and nothing is uploaded anywhere.
uvx finances demo && uvx finances web --db demo.db --open # try it on made-up data
20 seconds, on the made-up data from finances demo. Click for the full video with sound.
The thing that makes it different: a statement prints its own totals, so the extraction can be proved correct. Every figure this produces traces back to a line on a statement, and the tool tells you when it cannot.
$ finances check
Store finances.db
Rows 1180 transactions, 2025-01-03 to 2025-12-29
Statements 36
Reconciled 36/36 (100%)
Every statement reconciles and no months are missing. The totals downstream
are traceable to a statement line.
A tool built on a bank API cannot do this. It receives a feed of transactions with no independent total to check them against, so a dropped charge or a flipped sign is invisible. Here the statement is the ground truth, and reconciliation is enforced rather than assumed.
Running it
Three ways in. Pick one; they all end at the same dashboard on
http://localhost:8787.
Try it first, with made-up data
Nobody should have to hand over a year of bank statements to find out whether
a tool is any good. demo writes twelve months of an invented checking account
and credit card — paychecks, rent, a subscription that raises its price, a
holiday spike — into a separate demo.db. It goes through the same
reconciliation and categorizer as a real statement.
# with uv, nothing to clone
uvx finances demo
uvx finances web --db demo.db --open
# or from a checkout
git clone https://github.com/roshanlam/finances && cd finances
uv run finances demo
uv run finances web --db demo.db --open
# or with Docker, nothing else installed
docker compose --profile demo up demo # then open http://localhost:8787
With your statements: uv
Requires uv (it fetches Python 3.12+ if you do not have it). For the browser dashboard you also need Node 20+; without it everything in the terminal still works.
uv sync # one dependency: pdfplumber
mkdir -p PDFs # drop your statement PDFs in here
uv run finances pipeline PDFs/ # parse, categorize, check, report
uv run finances web --open # builds the dashboard on first run
Any folder layout works — subfolders are searched too. Tested against Amex, Chase (card and checking), Capital One and Discover. For any other bank, use its export (next section), or let a local model read the PDF.
Any bank: CSV, OFX/QFX, CAMT.053, MT940
Nearly every bank lets you download your transactions. import reads those
files, works out the columns, the date format, the decimal separator and which
way the amounts are signed, and checks them against whatever balances the file
carries:
uv run finances import ~/Downloads/activity.csv
uv run finances import exports/ # a whole folder, any mix of formats
| Format | Who exports it | How it is checked |
|---|---|---|
| CSV with a running balance | most bank accounts | every row has to move the balance by exactly its amount |
| CSV without one | most card sites | imported, and marked unverified — honestly |
| OFX / QFX / QBO | US banks ("Quicken" / "Money" download) | each export's opening balance must equal the previous export's closing balance |
| CAMT.053 | European banks (ISO 20022 XML) | opening balance + every booked entry = closing balance |
| MT940 | European banks (SWIFT) | opening balance + every entry = closing balance |
Headers are recognised in English, German, French, Spanish, Italian, Dutch and
the Nordic languages, 1.234,56 and 05.01.2026 are read the European way, and
a summary block above the header (Bank of America does this) is skipped. When
downloads overlap, rows already in the store for that account are skipped, not
counted twice. If a CSV is ambiguous, say so: --sign out-negative,
--date-format %d.%m.%Y, --account 1234 --issuer "My Bank" --kind card.
A bank the parser does not know: a local model, checked
uv run finances parse PDFs/ --llm
When a statement's layout is not understood (nothing extracted, or the
extraction does not reconcile), its text goes to a model running on your
machine — Ollama, LM Studio or llama.cpp — which lists the transaction rows.
The statement's printed totals are still read by the deterministic parser, so
the model never supplies both the answer and the check: its rows are kept only
if they add up to those totals. Otherwise they are discarded and the statement
stays marked as a mismatch. FINANCES_LLM_FALLBACK=1 turns this on for the
dashboard's uploads too.
Always look at the check verdict at the end before trusting anything
else. If it does not say 100%, the numbers downstream are built on a bad
extraction, and every other report will tell you so too.
With your statements: Docker
mkdir -p PDFs # drop your statement PDFs in here
docker compose up # then open http://localhost:8787
On start the container parses whatever is in ./PDFs (unchanged files are
skipped), categorizes it, prints the check verdict and serves the dashboard.
The store and every generated report land in ./data. Every command works the
same way inside it:
docker compose run --rm finances check
docker compose run --rm finances cashflow
docker compose run --rm finances ask --example top-merchants
The port is published on 127.0.0.1 only, and .dockerignore is a whitelist:
your PDFs and database are never sent to the Docker daemon or baked into an
image.
The dashboard
Your statements, the reconciliation verdict for each one, spending by month and category, detected subscriptions, and a searchable transaction table. You can drag new statement PDFs or bank exports straight onto it: they are read on drop, and the reply tells you how many transactions came out and whether the file checks out.
- Wrapped — your year in money: where it went, your regular, the month that got away from you, what subscriptions cost you all year, and how much of it traces back to a statement that reconciles.
- Budgets & goals — a monthly limit per category, projected to the end of the month so you hear about it before it is broken; savings goals against the surplus your statements actually show.
- Cancel these — recurring charges ranked by what dropping them saves, with the reason each one is there (a price that went up, three services doing one job). Mark one cancelled and any charge after that date is flagged.
The server makes no outbound requests, binds to localhost, and refuses any request that does not come from a page on localhost — so another website open in the same browser cannot read your transactions from it.
While working on the frontend, run the two halves separately —
uv run finances web in one terminal, cd web && npm run dev in another, then
use http://localhost:5173 (it proxies /api through).
Or stay in the terminal
uv run finances analyze # where the money went
uv run finances wrapped # your year in money
uv run finances budget # this month against your limits
uv run finances budget cancel # the subscriptions worth cancelling
uv run finances cashflow # the next 60 days
uv run finances audit # the reckoning
uv run finances cpi # your own inflation rate
uv run finances backtest # how accurate are the forecasts
uv run finances ask "how much did I spend on coffee in March"
uv run finances on its own lists every command; uv run finances <command> --help shows that tool's own options. Inside an activated virtualenv
(source .venv/bin/activate), drop the uv run. Without uv at all:
python3 -m venv .venv && .venv/bin/pip install -e . and then
.venv/bin/finances.
Configuration
Everything is a flag, and the few things you would otherwise repeat on every command are also environment variables:
| Variable | Default | What it sets |
|---|---|---|
FINANCES_DB |
finances.db |
the store every command reads and writes |
FINANCES_PDF_DIR |
./PDFs |
where dashboard uploads are saved |
FINANCES_HOST / FINANCES_PORT |
127.0.0.1 / 8787 |
where finances web listens |
FINANCES_CURRENCY |
USD (or finances fx --base) |
the currency every total is reported in |
FINANCES_LLM_ENDPOINT |
Ollama, LM Studio, llama.cpp on localhost | the model server for ask, enrich and parse --llm |
FINANCES_LLM_FALLBACK |
off | 1 lets a local model read unknown PDF layouts, uploads included |
FINANCES_PLAN |
plan.json |
where savings goals are kept |
FINANCES_WEB_DIST |
web/dist, or the copy inside the package |
a prebuilt dashboard to serve |
Command reference
| Command | What it does | Writes |
|---|---|---|
parse PDFs/ |
extract transactions from statement PDFs (--llm for unknown layouts) |
finances.db |
import exports/ |
bank CSV, OFX/QFX, CAMT.053 and MT940 files | finances.db |
check |
reconciliation and coverage report | — |
categorize apply |
label transactions, write back to the store | finances.db |
analyze |
spending dashboard | finance_dashboard.html, insights.md |
cashflow |
daily balance projection with a low-point warning | cashflow.html |
plan status |
savings goals against your real surplus | plan.json |
budget |
monthly limits per category; budget cancel for the cancel list |
finances.db |
wrapped |
your year in money | — |
export beancount |
beancount, hledger/ledger, YNAB or Actual files | the file you name |
fx |
base currency and exchange rates | finances.db |
audit |
a strict grandfather goes through your statements | auditor_ledger.json |
cpi |
personal inflation, per merchant and per category | cpi.html |
backtest |
grades the forecasts against what actually happened | backtest.html |
ask "..." |
plain-English questions, answered offline | — |
anonymize |
a copy safe to share | transactions_shareable.csv |
enrich |
local-LLM merchant cleanup | finances.db |
web |
serve the browser dashboard, with PDF drag-and-drop | — |
demo |
a year of made-up statements, to try everything on | demo.db |
pipeline PDFs/ |
parse + categorize + analyze in one run | all of the above |
Every command accepts either the SQLite store or a CSV, interchangeably:
uv run finances analyze --db finances.db
uv run finances analyze cleanedData/transactions.csv
Things you will probably need
# Encrypted PDFs
uv run finances parse PDFs/ --password 1234
# A statement extracted wrong — see what the parser saw
uv run finances parse "PDFs/one bad file.pdf" --dump-columns
# Fail the build if anything does not reconcile (for a cron job)
uv run finances check --strict
# Re-parse everything, ignoring the cache
uv run finances parse PDFs/ --force
# Tell it your take-home pay, so it can work out what is left over
uv run finances analyze --income 6200
# Teach the categorizer, biggest money first
uv run finances categorize review
Hand it to the tool you already use
This gets complete, checked transactions out of statements. Budgeting apps and plain-text ledgers are better at other things, so it hands the rows over:
uv run finances export beancount -o money.beancount --balances
uv run finances export hledger -o money.journal --balances # ledger-cli reads it too
uv run finances export ynab -o exports/ # one CSV per account
uv run finances export actual -o exports/
With --balances, every reconciled statement's closing balance becomes a
balance assertion, so bean-check or hledger check re-verifies the whole
history independently of this tool. Card payments from checking go through an
Assets:Transfers account, so they net to zero instead of counting twice.
More than one currency
Each transaction keeps the currency its file was in. Totals are reported in one base currency, at rates you set — there is no rate feed, because nothing here goes online:
uv run finances fx --base EUR # report in euros
uv run finances fx USD=0.92 GBP=1.17 # 1 USD is 0.92 of the base currency
uv run finances fx # what is set, and what is still missing
Rows in a currency with no rate are left out of the totals and counted, and the dashboard says so, rather than quietly adding euros to dollars.
Asking questions offline
ask needs a local model server. Without one, --sql and --examples still
work:
uv run finances ask --examples
uv run finances ask --sql "SELECT category, SUM(amount) FROM transactions GROUP BY 1 ORDER BY 2 DESC"
With one:
brew install ollama && ollama pull llama3.1:8b
uv run finances ask "what did I spend on delivery last month" --explain
Something in the 3B–8B range is plenty. Avoid reasoning models here — they take
minutes per question for no benefit on this task. Pick explicitly with
--model llama3.1:8b.
If something goes wrong
| Symptom | Cause and fix |
|---|---|
finances.db does not exist |
Run parse first. |
check reports mismatches |
The extraction is wrong for those files. Run finances parse <file> --dump-columns to see the columns it found, or --llm to let a local model try. |
| A bank is not supported | Download its CSV/OFX export and finances import it, or ask for the bank. |
check reports gaps |
A statement month is missing from your folder. Totals are being computed on incomplete data. |
Lots of Uncategorized |
categorize review to teach it, or enrich to use a local LLM. |
cashflow will not project |
It could not find a checking-account balance. Pass --balance 2400. |
| Amounts look wrong | Almost always a column-detection problem. --dump-columns, then --amount-col last or second-last to override. |
How it fits together
PDFs ─────▶ parse.py ───┐
(llm_parse.py, checked) ├──▶ finances.db ──▶ engine.py ──▶ every other tool
exports ─▶ importer.py ─┘ │ │
│ the read model: what counts as
each file checked against │ spending, which months are complete,
its own totals or balances │ what repeats, what is verified
└──▶ export.py ──▶ beancount, hledger, YNAB, Actual
finances/ the package — one module per tool, plus the shared core below
cli.py `finances <command>`: the front door, dispatches to each tool
parse.py PDFs -> the store, reconciling each statement as it goes
importer.py bank exports (CSV, OFX, CAMT.053, MT940) -> the store, balance-checked
llm_parse.py a local model for unknown PDF layouts, kept only if it reconciles
engine.py the read model every tool shares
export.py the store -> beancount, hledger, YNAB, Actual
api.py the dashboard's JSON API and static server
demo.py the made-up store
... analyze, cashflow, cpi, backtest, ask, planner, anonymize, ...
web/ the dashboard (React + Vite), served by `finances web`
tests/ stdlib unittest, no test dependencies
docker/ Dockerfile docker-compose.yml
Every module still runs on its own too: python -m finances.parse --help.
models.py— one definition of a transaction and a statement. The SQLite schema and the CSV columns are both generated from it, so adding a field is a single edit and the store migrates itself.database.py— the store, plus a content-hash cache so re-running the parser skips files that have not changed.utils.py— money, date and merchant parsing, the debt formulas, and the recurring-charge detector.engine.py— the semantics. Everything downstream agrees about what a month, a surplus and a subscription are because they all ask this.
What it does that other tools do not
Proves its own numbers. Extracted charges are checked against the total the statement prints for itself, and the verdict is stored, not just displayed. Missing statement months are detected and reported as gaps, so an average is never quietly computed over incomplete data.
This is not decorative. Building it found a noise filter matching the month "Apr" and discarding entire statements, sign inversions on two issuers, a year-rollover that dated 62 transactions to the wrong December, and a primary key that silently dropped 41 of one statement's 181 transactions. All of them looked fine in a dashboard. None survive a reconciliation check.
Tells you about next month, not just last month. cashflow projects the
daily balance forward from known recurring charges and detected paycheck
cadence — distinguishing semi-monthly from biweekly, because biweekly gives you
three-paycheck months and that changes the answer. It reports a band rather than
a line and says plainly that it is not a confidence interval.
Measures your inflation, not the country's. cpi weights per-category price
changes by your spending and tracks per-merchant prices over time, against real
BLS Consumer Expenditure and CPI-U reference data shipped with the project.
Grades its own forecasts. backtest walks forward month by month, predicts
each month using only data from before it, and scores nine predictors against
what happened. It refuses to name a winner when the sample cannot support one.
Makes your data shareable. anonymize has four levels up to fully
synthetic, and proves what survived — per-category totals are printed side by
side so you can see which figures are still exactly true.
Categorization
Rules, in order, first hit wins. Every answer records which rule fired and how confident it is:
- what you taught it (
learned_rules.json, always wins) - context rules —
COSTCO+GASis fuel,UBER+EATSis delivery - bank phrases — a deposit account names its own transaction type
- brand table, exact token match, never substring
- keyword rules, word-boundary regex
- issuer MCC labels, where the statement prints its own category
- behaviour — cadence and amount, when the name says nothing
Scored against 159 real-shaped descriptors with processor prefixes, glued city/state suffixes and issuer preambles:
$ uv run finances categorize eval
correct 159 100.0%
wrong 0 0.0% <- these corrupt analysis
left unknown 0 0.0% <- these are honest
Tests
uv run python -m unittest discover tests
289 tests, no test dependencies. The parser's golden-file tests skip when
PDFs/ is empty, so a fresh clone runs the rest. The golden-file harness
records per-statement extraction totals so a parser change that moves a number
is visible:
uv run python tests/run.py --update-golden # after a deliberate change
uv run python tests/run.py --check-golden # exits 1 on drift
Privacy
Your statements and the store never leave the machine. PDFs/, *.db, the
generated dashboards and anonymize_map.json are all gitignored. The map file
is what turns MERCHANT_007 back into a real name — keep it, do not share it.
ask, enrich and parse --llm talk only to a model server on localhost.
Nothing else in the project makes a network request at all. See
SECURITY.md for how the dashboard is locked to your own machine
and how to report a problem.
Not financial advice
Arithmetic on your own statements. The forecasts are extrapolations of your past
spending and say so, backtest will tell you how wrong they have been, and none
of it knows anything about your life beyond what the statements print.
License
MIT. See LICENSE.
Metadata
Release files for finances 0.3.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | Provenance | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| finances-0.3.0.tar.gz | 553.6 kB | Without provenance | Details for finances-0.3.0.tar.gz |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Actions Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| finances-0.3.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details for finances-0.3.0-py3-none-any.whl |
Total release size: 1.1 MB
Release files / finances-0.3.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | finances-0.3.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 553.6 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
402cc72ac00ff75637eec7a6e654e75493f3312c282f8f12b82a76cfcf088e23
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
b95ad039be8a42b55c41e77fe26786a171b21924cec72bb6d344923d302c50c2
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
No |
| Uploaded via |
uv/0.13.5 {"installer":{"name":"uv","version":"0.13.5","subcommand":["publish"]},"python":null,"implementation":{"name":null,"version":null},"distro":{"name":"macOS","version":null,"id":null,"libc":null},"system":{"name":null,"release":null},"cpu":null,"openssl_version":null,"setuptools_version":null,"rustc_version":null,"ci":null}
|
Release files / finances-0.3.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | finances-0.3.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 526.9 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
5e11b76532e303404e7c6dbbfaa8fd7948e1cf119cbe10823405674a64f76e7c
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
4ddccb058012cccdc997783f7d6cf872ad3b4ce04923d48b1f8339bc795430b1
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
No |
| Uploaded via |
uv/0.13.5 {"installer":{"name":"uv","version":"0.13.5","subcommand":["publish"]},"python":null,"implementation":{"name":null,"version":null},"distro":{"name":"macOS","version":null,"id":null,"libc":null},"system":{"name":null,"release":null},"cpu":null,"openssl_version":null,"setuptools_version":null,"rustc_version":null,"ci":null}
|
Security for finances 0.3.0
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
No provenance found
None of the files in this release were uploaded with provenance metadata.
A note on package security
PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.
To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.