_{Quadrotor, fixed-wing, VTOL, planning, trajectory generation, estimation, mapping, swarms and reinforcement learning, closing on all 44 simulations. Every frame is simulated at render time by scripts/make_promo.py — no stock footage, and nothing that can drift out of sync with the code. Above is a sample of each scene; the full seventy-eight seconds, at full resolution, is on the docs site.}

Install

pip install flybots

flybots doctor            # verify the install, run the physics self-checks
flybots list              # browse 44 simulations
flybots run pid_hover     # render one to a GIF
flybots train hover       # teach a quadrotor to hold position

Sixty seconds in

A fixed wing, trimmed and flown to a new altitude and heading:

from uav_sim.vehicles.fixed_wing import create_fixed_wing, FixedWingPreset
from uav_sim.control.fixed_wing_autopilot import FixedWingAutopilot, AutopilotCommand

aircraft = create_fixed_wing(FixedWingPreset.SKYWALKER_X8)
aircraft.reset_trimmed(altitude=120.0)          # solve for equilibrium flight

pilot = FixedWingAutopilot(aircraft.fw_params)  # gains derived from the airframe
command = AutopilotCommand(altitude=160.0, airspeed=20.0, course=1.0)

for _ in range(12_000):
    aircraft.step(pilot.compute(aircraft.state, command, 0.01), 0.01)

print(aircraft.state[2])    # 160.0

What is here

Nothing here wraps a solver. The Newton-Euler equations, the aerodynamic coefficient build-up, the Kalman recursions and the sampling-based planners are written out in NumPy next to the citation they came from.

Flight models

Three airframes, one frame convention, so they compose.

from uav_sim.vehicles.fixed_wing import create_fixed_wing, FixedWingPreset

aircraft = create_fixed_wing(FixedWingPreset.AEROSONDE)
controls = aircraft.reset_trimmed(airspeed=35.0, altitude=200.0)

for _ in range(6000):
    aircraft.step(controls, 0.005)

aircraft.state[2]     # 200.0 — thirty seconds, open loop, no drift

That is the acceptance test for the whole aerodynamic model: if any force or moment is inconsistent, trim is not an equilibrium and the aircraft wanders. Every stability derivative is live, and there is a test that fails if you zero any of them.

• Fixed-wing — coefficient build-up, stall, trim solver
• VTOL tilt-rotor — hover → cruise → hover with altitude held
• Quadrotor — mixer and per-motor dynamics

Teach one to fly

flybots envs                # 6 tasks: hover, waypoint, trajectory, landing, 2 fixed-wing
flybots train hover         # pure NumPy — no deep-learning stack
flybots play hover --policy policies/hover.npz --gif hover.gif

from uav_sim.gym import make, train, evaluate

result = train("hover", iterations=120, seed=0)
print(evaluate("hover", result.policy, episodes=25))

Gymnasium's API without the Gymnasium dependency. Install flybots[gym] and the environments register as uav_sim/Hover-v0 for use with any standard RL library.

The interesting part is not the algorithm — it is that four setup choices decide whether these tasks are learnable at all. Each is documented with the measurement that motivated it.

Simulations

Forty-odd runnable demos, each with a three-panel animation, an academic reference and a JSON log:

flybots list
flybots info astar_3d
flybots run astar_3d

Browse them all in the algorithm atlas.

Conventions

Worth ten minutes before you write a controller:

A consequence of Forward-Left-Up is that positive pitch is nose-down, and because the world is ENU, banking right decreases the heading. Aerodynamics texts use Forward-Right-Down; the library converts at the boundary rather than rewriting the equations. Full details in Frames and conventions.

Development

git clone https://github.com/guilyx/flybots.git
cd flybots
uv sync --all-groups

uv run flybots doctor
uv run pytest

pre-commit install && pre-commit install --hook-type commit-msg

Contributions welcome — see CONTRIBUTING.md for the bar a new algorithm has to clear, and CHANGELOG.md for what has changed.

Safety

These models are simplified, the controllers are not certified, and nothing here has been validated against a real airframe. Do not fly hardware on control code taken from this repository without independent verification. See SECURITY.md.

License

MIT — see LICENSE.