A fast minimumweight perfect matching solver for quantum error correction
Project description
Fusion Blossom
A fast MinimumWeight Perfect Matching (MWPM) solver for Quantum Error Correction (QEC)
Please see our tutorial for a quick explanation and some Python demos.
Our paper is out on arXiv! https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.08307
Key Features
 Correctness: This is an exact MWPM solver, verified against the Blossom V library with millions of randomized test cases .
 Linear Complexity: The average decoding time is roughly $O(N)$ given small physical error rate, proportional to the number of defect vertices $N$.
 Parallelism: A single MWPM decoding problem can be partitioned and solved in parallel, then fused together to find an exact global MWPM solution.
 Simple Interface: The graph problem is abstracted and easytouse for QEC applications. Especially, it supports decoding erasure errors (by setting some edge weights to 0 on the fly).
Benchmark Highlights
 In circuitlevel noise model with $p$ = 0.001, code distance $d$ = 21, rotated CSS code, 100000 measurement rounds
 singlethread: 3.9us per defect vertex or 13us per measurement round
 64threads: 95ns per defect vertex or 0.3us per measurement round
 in streaming mode, the latency is 0.7ms regardless of rounds of measurement
Background and Key Ideas
MWPM decoders are widely known for its high accuracy [1] and several optimizations that further improves its accuracy [2]. However, there weren't many publications that improve the speed of the MWPM decoder over the past 10 years. Fowler implemented an $O(N)$ asymptotic complexity MWPM decoder in [3] and proposed an $O(1)$ complexity parallel MWPM decoder in [4], but none of these are publicly available to our best knowledge. Higgott implemented a fast but approximate MWPM decoder (namely "local matching") with roughly $O(N)$ complexity in [5]. With recent experiments of successful QEC on real hardware, it's time for a fast and accurate MWPM decoder to become available to the community.
Our idea comes from our study on the UnionFind (UF) decoder [6]. UF decoder is a fast decoder with $O(N)$ worstcase time complexity, at the cost of being less accurate compared to the MWPM decoder. Inspired by the Fowler's diagram [3], we found a relationship between the UF decoder [7]. This nice animation (press space to trigger animation) could help people see the analogy between UF and MWPM decoders. With this interpretation, we're able to combind the strength of UF and MWPM decoders together.
 From the UF decoder, we learnt to use a sparse decoding graph representation for fast speed
 From the MWPM decoder, we learnt to find an exact minimumweight perfect matching for high accuracy
We shall note that Oscar Higgott and Craig Gidney independently reach the same approach of using sparse decoding graph to solve MWPM more efficiently in PyMatching V2 [8]. It's impressive to see that they have much better singlethread performance than fusionblossom (about 5x20x speedup). They use more optimizations like priority queue that appears in existing literature of blossom algorithms (check their paper at [9]). Also, they use C++ language rather than Rust programming language. Rust enforces memory safety which adds some runtime overhead (like vector boundary check and unnecessary locks in parallel programming). We use unsafe
Rust to improve the speed by 1.5x3x but these features are not yet enabled in the Python library and only available when using the native Rust library. In fact, PyMatching V2's optimizations and fusionblossom's parallel computation (fusion operation) are compatible with each other. With their impressive work, we're looking forward to another 5x20x speed of the parallel MWPM decoder if combined together. For now, user should use PyMatching for better CPU efficiency in largescale simulations, and use fusionblossom library as an educational tool with visualization tool and entrylevel tutorials.
Demo
We highly suggest you watch through several demos here to get a sense of how the algorithm works. All our demos are captured from real algorithm execution. In fact, we're showing you the visualized debugger tool we wrote for fusion blossom. The demo is a 3D website and you can control the view point as you like.
Click the demo image below to view the corresponding demo
Serial Execution
Parallel Execution (Shown in Serial For Better Visual)
Usage
Our code is written in Rust programming language for speed and memory safety, but it's hardly an easy language to learn. To make the decoder more accessible, we bind the library to Python and user can simply install the library using pip3 install fusionblossom
.
We have several Python demos at the tutorial website . Also there is a simple example for decoder, and you can run it by cloning the project and run python3 scripts/demo.py
.
For parallel solver, it needs user to provide a partition strategy. Please check our paper for a thorough description of how partition works.
Interface
Sparse Decoding Graph and Integer Weights
The weights in QEC decoding graph are computed by taking the log of error probability, e.g. $w_e = \log{(1p)/p}$ or roughly $w_e = \log{p}$, we can safely use integers to save weights by e.g. multiplying the weights by 1e6 and truncate to nearest integer. In this way, the truncation error $\Delta w_e = 1$ of integer weights corresponds to relative error $\Delta p /{p}=10^{6}$ which is small enough. Suppose physical error rate $p$ is in the range of a positive f64
variable (2.2e308 to 1), the maximum weight is 7e7,which is well below the maximum value of a u32
variable (4.3e9). Since weights only sum up in our algorithm (no multiplication), u32
is large enough and accurate enough. By default we use usize
which is platform dependent (usually 64 bits), but you can
We use integer also for ease of migrating to FPGA implementation. In order to fit more vertices into a single FPGA, it's necessary to reduce the resource usage for each vertex. Integers are much cheaper than floatingpoint numbers, and also it allows flexible tradeoff between resource usage and accuracy, e.g. if all weights are equal, we can simply use a 2 bit integer.
Note that other libraries of MWPM solver like Blossom V also default to integer weights as well. Although one can change the macro to use floatingpoint weights, it's not recommended because "the code may even get stuck due to rounding errors".
Tests
In order to test the correctness of our MWPM solver, we need a groundtruth MWPM solver. Blossom V is widelyused in existing MWPM decoders, but according to the license we cannot embed it in this library.To run the test cases with ground truth comparison or enable the functions like blossom_v_mwpm
, you need to download this library at this website to a folder named blossomV
at the root directory of this git repo.
wget c https://pub.ist.ac.at/~vnk/software/blossom5v2.05.src.tar.gz O   tar xz
cp r blossom5v2.05.src/* blossomV/
rm r blossom5v2.05.src
Visualization
Visualize the solving procedure of a single decoding problem
To start a server, run the following
cd visualize
python3 server.py # server
# to view it in a browser interactively, you can run the following command to get url
cd ..
cargo test visualize_paper_weighted_union_find_decoder  nocapture
# alternatively, you can choose to render locally
npm install # to download packages
node index.js <url> <width> <height> # local render
Visualize parallel execution of multiple decoding problems
In order to understand the bottleneck of parallel execution, we wrote a visualization tool to display the execution windows of base partitions and fusion operations on multiple threads. Fusion operation only scales with the size of the fusion boundary and the depth of active partitions, irrelevant to the base partition's size. We study different partition and fusion strategies in our paper. Below shows the parallel execution on 64 threads. Blue blocks are base partitions, each consists of 49 rounds of measurement. Green blocks are fusion operations, a single round of measurement sandwiched by two neighbor base partitions. You can click the image which jumps to this interactive visualization tool.
TODOs
 support erasures in parallel solver
Acknowledgements
This project is funded by NSF MRI: Development of PARAGON: Control Instrument for Post NISQ Quantum Computing
References
[1] Fowler, Austin G., et al. "Topological code autotune." Physical Review X 2.4 (2012): 041003.
[2] Criger, Ben, and Imran Ashraf. "Multipath summation for decoding 2D topological codes." Quantum 2 (2018): 102.
[3] Fowler, Austin G., Adam C. Whiteside, and Lloyd CL Hollenberg. "Towards practical classical processing for the surface code: timing analysis." Physical Review A 86.4 (2012): 042313.
[4] Fowler, Austin G. "Minimum weight perfect matching of faulttolerant topological quantum error correction in average $ O (1) $ parallel time." arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.1740 (2013).
[5] Higgott, Oscar. "PyMatching: A Python package for decoding quantum codes with minimumweight perfect matching." ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing 3.3 (2022): 116.
[6] Delfosse, Nicolas, and Naomi H. Nickerson. "Almostlinear time decoding algorithm for topological codes." Quantum 5 (2021): 595.
[7] Wu, Yue. APS 2022 March Meeting Talk "Interpretation of UnionFind Decoder on Weighted Graphs and Application to XZZX Surface Code". Slides: https://us.wuyue98.cn/aps2022, Video: https://youtu.be/BbhqUHKPdQk
[8] Higgott, Oscar. PyMatching v2 https://github.com/oscarhiggott/PyMatching
[9] Higgott, Oscar, and Craig Gidney. "Sparse Blossom: correcting a million errors per core second with minimumweight matching." arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.15933 (2023).
Project details
Release history Release notifications  RSS feed
Download files
Download the file for your platform. If you're not sure which to choose, learn more about installing packages.
Source Distributions
Built Distributions
Hashes for fusion_blossom0.2.10cp37abi3win_amd64.whl
Algorithm  Hash digest  

SHA256  f662ad6f05be11366e5cad6ce7b6da659fab511c221b9b56c186eb11c32a57b1 

MD5  bab873f04afa1b57e71caff4efd47b7b 

BLAKE2b256  ea173a5875b0a87d4096c425ec3d35f4ae157ed5ddb33a209bb462d0a4835802 
Hashes for fusion_blossom0.2.10cp37abi3win32.whl
Algorithm  Hash digest  

SHA256  fd09ab3aecf54386545b7850d02aa7c228ec570174c3805f373c01275181ca55 

MD5  6a6f854c5ca027d3688d6937ab9cdfbb 

BLAKE2b256  6c889e8e2939c14b1c34c6bee2c876e19b234710f9c6629e6aeaffcfd0399de2 
Hashes for fusion_blossom0.2.10cp37abi3musllinux_1_1_x86_64.whl
Algorithm  Hash digest  

SHA256  330d8fbd0df4f214b7aef42f62e6a571c415dee8d54e72154269c7adb1fe58bf 

MD5  3f6801aafda718c36f83a53dcac025d4 

BLAKE2b256  491227b81da38bbf8e8d4e5fbfb8e5c6e3fd6e46e70b6e184929c102dd4c836e 
Hashes for fusion_blossom0.2.10cp37abi3manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl
Algorithm  Hash digest  

SHA256  d87d91810bddce9763e23237a35baf71ce65bdfd27c7301a93df938ac185531a 

MD5  32367d76fe1a419497f26b0a2f0ac413 

BLAKE2b256  771cc5a7392d6cd5b8548c8ad423ad45bc16225462a1f4639ef4d1f7066133aa 
Hashes for fusion_blossom0.2.10cp37abi3macosx_10_9_x86_64.macosx_11_0_arm64.macosx_10_9_universal2.whl
Algorithm  Hash digest  

SHA256  9038403491edf0ce40f9e63d9edab81696023fe11bb80359742f8d3bf681e756 

MD5  72b28e415ccbcbe807782fc23ab15c4c 

BLAKE2b256  c08fcee15b2ba639619420143c7dbfc297462fe334eed03352e59fc985fa2f73 