grundnorm 0.3.0

Official SDK for the Grundnorm grounded source-of-law truth layer — resolve a legal norm by open identifier (ELI/ECLI) + date and verify its cryptographic seal locally.

grundnorm (Python SDK)

Resolve a legal norm by its open identifier (ELI/ECLI) and a date, and get back its canonical, sealed meaning as an independently verifiable signed object. The SDK recomputes the content hash and verifies every Ed25519 signature locally — you never have to trust the server.

• Deterministic, zero-LLM read path. Honest not_found instead of a guess.
• Point-in-time: [validFrom, validUntil).
• Python 3.9+. One dependency: cryptography.

Install

pip install grundnorm

Use

from grundnorm import GrundnormClient

# Defaults to the public GDPR demonstrator. For a pilot:
#   GrundnormClient(endpoint="https://.../api/grundnorm/resolve", api_key="nlk_...")
client = GrundnormClient()

r = client.resolve(
    id="http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/art_5",
    jurisdiction="EU",
    at="2026-07-07",   # omit for "today"
)

if r.status == "found":
    print(r.norm["atoms"])          # subject / modality / action / condition / exception / scope + evidence
    print(r.verification["ok"])     # True only if hash recomputes AND all signatures verify

resolve() verifies the seal by default. Skip with verify=False, or verify a stored envelope later:

from grundnorm import verify
v = verify(norm)  # {"ok", "cryptographically_ok", "hash_ok", "view_consistent", "status_re_derivable", "signatures", "quorum", "attestation"}

v["ok"] proves cryptographic soundness, not trustworthiness. True iff the bytes, the view and every signature check out (1-3 below) — exactly what a third party re-derives from the response alone. It does not establish that the signers are independent institutions, that the record is externally anchored, or that its meaning is jurist-correct. A demo record signed by one party is ok: True. Read quorum and attestation before treating a record as authoritative.

What verify() re-derives (no trust required)

1. Hash: sha256(canonicalize(norm["canonical"]["content"])) equals norm["seal"]["contentHash"], where canonicalize = JSON with keys sorted recursively (UTF-16 order), no whitespace, UTF-8.
2. View integrity: the English atoms/purpose are exactly what the sealed canonical.content projects to (view_consistent); canonical.content is the source of truth.
3. Signatures: each seal.signatures[].signatureHex is a valid Ed25519 signature by that signer's publicKeyHex over the UTF-8 bytes of the seal.contentHash hex string.
4. Status (when a classification witness is present): each atom's status (fixed/needs_review/for_the_court) re-executes from the deterministic rule applied to the sealed per-atom signals (status_re_derivable). A mismatch fails ok. None = no witness (older seals) → not re-derivable, no penalty. Bounded: proves the rule was applied to sealed inputs; it does not prove the deontic decomposition is faithful to the article (that is the jurist gate).

What it REPORTS but does not prove

• quorum — a signature count (valid_signatures, has_sovereign, meets = >=2 incl. one sovereign). Not proof of institutional independence.
• attestation — honest flags the SDK cannot prove: custody ("unverified" for the demo — one party regardless of pinning), independence (as asserted in the record), ledger ("unanchored" for demo/local seals), key_provenance ("pinned_oob" when a signer's key matches the SDK's out-of-band snapshot, else "in_band_response"), classification ("rule_reexecuted", "not_present", or "rule_unsupported" when the witness declares a rule version this SDK does not implement).
• Key pinning (key_provenance, per-signature pinned) is tamper-evidence of a snapshot, not proof of institutional independence: a single-party demo key is pinned yet custody stays "unverified". It is not a key-transparency log.

Errors

• Nothing sealed for (id, date) → returns NotFound (a normal outcome).
• Bad key, bad input, or server error → raises GrundnormError (.status, .code).

Demonstrator note: the demo corpus (GDPR sample) is signed by demo keys, not institutions, and its accuracy is not yet jurist-graded. See the project's DEMO-TRUTHFULNESS.md.