imgtrail

Find out where else on the web your own photos show up.

Point it at your Instagram data export. It hashes every photo, collapses the near-duplicates so you never pay to search the same picture twice, runs each unique one through reverse image search, and then downloads every candidate and compares it against your original before putting it in the report. What you get back is a list you can trust, not a pile of URLs.

imgtrail scan ~/Downloads/instagram-export.zip --dry-run
imgtrail scan ~/Downloads/instagram-export.zip
imgtrail report --open

Two engines, because one index is not the web

Reverse image search is not one thing. Cloud Vision's WEB_DETECTION and the Google Lens you get by dragging a photo into the search box are different indexes, and they disagree.

Measured on one photograph — a drone shot of a castle:

Neither is a superset of the other. So both are here:

imgtrail scan EXPORT                    # vision: cheap and wide, the default
imgtrail scan EXPORT --engine lens      # lens: a different index, for the photos you care about

A photo already searched by one engine is still new to the other, so --engine lens --limit 20 spends twenty searches on the twenty you have not covered yet. Results from both land in the same report and are verified the same way.

Lens costs four times what Vision does, so spend it where the cheap engine came back empty:

imgtrail scan EXPORT --engine lens --only-blank --limit 200

Two hundred a month fits inside the free plan, and --only-blank keeps them off the photos something has already been found on.

What it finds, and what it doesn't

It searches Google's index, so it finds your photos on blogs, news sites, Pinterest, Tumblr, forums, scraper mirrors and shops that lifted your pictures — and on public Facebook posts and groups, which is where a photograph of somewhere recognisable tends to end up.

It will not find a repost on another Instagram account. Instagram blocks crawling of post images, so they aren't in anyone's index — the only way such a repost surfaces here is indirectly, via one of the many "Instagram viewer" mirror sites that are indexed. Telegram, WhatsApp, TikTok and private accounts are invisible to it too. If your question is "is someone reposting me inside Instagram", this is the wrong tool and there isn't a good one.

What it cannot prove, it says so. A candidate the search named and the site would not serve — TikTok, Facebook's lookaside — is listed apart under "found, but not verified": a place to go and look, not a claim. Pages named with no image at all are not kept: of the page-level claims that could be checked against the original, 9.6% held.

Your own Facebook page is not filtered out: from a group post there is no telling whose it is. If you cross-post everything from Instagram, --ignore-domain facebook.com.

Install

pip install imgtrail

Getting your photos

Instagram → Settings → Accounts Centre → Your information and permissions → Download your information. Ask for JSON, high quality. You'll get a ZIP; hand it straight to imgtrail scan. No scraping, nothing against the terms of service, no rate limits.

A plain folder of images works just as well.

Getting an API key

Vision, the default. Create a project at console.cloud.google.com, enable the Cloud Vision API, then Credentials → Create credentials → API key.

export IMGTRAIL_API_KEY=AIza...

The first 1,000 images each month are free, then $3.50 per 1,000. A typical profile costs nothing.

Lens, optional, through SerpApi.

export SERPAPI_KEY=...

250 searches a month on the free plan, which is enough for the way it is meant to be used: a second opinion on the photos you care about, not a second pass over everything. Beyond that it is a subscription, around $15 per 1,000 — four times Vision. Your photos are uploaded, never published to a URL.

Run --dry-run first with either one and it will tell you exactly how many searches it would make and what they would cost before spending anything.

How the verification works

Reverse image search returns a lot of near-misses. For every candidate, imgtrail downloads the image and compares perceptual hashes against your original:

Only confirmed and likely reach the report. visuallySimilarImages is dropped entirely — it means "semantically alike", not "this is your photo", and it drowns the report in noise.

Commands

imgtrail scan SOURCE          index, dedupe, search and verify — resumable
  --engine vision|lens        which index to search (default vision)
  --only-blank                only photos nothing has been found on yet
  --dry-run                   count the searches and their cost, call nothing
  --limit N                   search at most N unique photos
  --threshold N               pHash distance for "same photo" (default 6)
  --ignore-domain DOMAIN      exclude a domain from results (repeatable)
  --again                     search everything again, paying for it again
  --no-verify                 skip the download-and-compare pass
imgtrail reparse              re-read the stored answers under today's filters
  --ignore-domain DOMAIN      exclude a domain from results (repeatable)
imgtrail trace PHOTO          everything the engine said about one photo, and its fate
imgtrail report --open        build the HTML report and open it
imgtrail status               what's in the database so far

State lives in ./imgtrail-data. Everything is idempotent: re-running scan searches only what it hasn't searched before, so an interrupted run costs nothing to resume. A scan stays inside the source you point it at — the database may hold other folders, and they are not what you asked to search.

trace answers "why is my photo not in the report" without reading the source: it prints what the engine said about that one photo and what each filter did with it. It reads the archive, so it costs nothing.

Every answer a search engine gives is kept verbatim. Filtering is a pile of judgement calls — which platforms are yours, which candidates are worth downloading — and at least one of them is wrong. reparse re-reads what you already paid for under the current rules, without calling anything, so correcting a filter costs nothing.

Privacy

Your photos are sent to Google Cloud Vision, and nowhere else. Nothing is uploaded to any server of mine — there isn't one. The database, the extracted export and the report all stay on your machine.

Architecture

Ports and adapters, sized to the problem: the rules sit in the middle and know nothing about Google, SQLite or HTTP, so swapping a search backend touches exactly one file.

domain.py     fingerprints, grouping, verdicts, what counts as "your own platform"
              — pure; no I/O, no SQL, no network
ports.py      the boundaries: PhotoSource, ImageLoader, SearchEngine, ImageFetcher,
              PhotoRepository, MatchRepository, ReportWriter
services.py   the use cases: index, plan, search, verify, report
adapters/     the details: sqlite_repository, vision, http_fetcher, local_files, html_report
cli.py        the composition root — the one module that knows every layer

Adding TinEye or Yandex means writing one SearchEngine and wiring it in cli.py. Nothing in domain.py or services.py changes.

Development

uv sync --all-groups
uv run pytest             # 85 tests, no network, no mocks
uv run ruff check .
uv run ruff format .
uv run mypy               # strict, and it passes on the tests too

The test doubles are real implementations, not mocks: an in-memory DictPhotoSource, a FakeSearchEngine that records what it was asked, and — where the wire itself is what needs testing — a real local HTTP server speaking Vision's JSON.

Licence

MIT