Laya

Multilingual, non-autoregressive System 1 decision engine. Typed decisions over 100+ languages in a single forward pass — 33 ms — trained with reinforcement learning against strictly proper scoring rules (RLCD), with a router that picks the right checkpoint per request.

Laya evaluates typed questions (choice, score, noul) over any state (text, email, ticket or JSON document) in a single forward pass — 33 ms for one question, 7.2 ms/question batched, measured on a T4. No text generation, so nothing to parse and nothing to hallucinate.

Three checkpoints, and a Router that picks between them per request:

Installation

pip install laya

Quickstart

import laya

# 1. Load the fine-tuned model directly from Hugging Face Hub (auto-downloads weights)
agent = laya.load("convaiinnovations/laya")

# 2. Provide any state (string or dictionary)
state = {
    "from": "user@acme.com",
    "subject": "Duplicate charge on invoice #4411",
    "body": "Hi, we were billed twice for March. Please refund the duplicate today or we will cancel our plan."
}

# 3. Define your typed questions
questions = {
    # choice: categorical selection with probabilities & confidence
    "department": {
        "type": "choice",
        "instructions": "Which department should handle this email?",
        "criteria": {
            "billing": "invoices, payments, refunds",
            "technical": "bugs, outages, system errors",
            "sales": "pricing, new contracts",
            "other": "everything else"
        }
    },
    # score: placement on an ordinal rubric
    "urgency": {
        "type": "score",
        "instructions": "How urgent is this request?",
        "criteria": ["not urgent", "soon", "critical deadline or blocking issue"]
    },
    # noul: calibrated boolean probability P(true)
    "churn_risk": {
        "type": "noul",
        "instructions": "Does the user threaten to cancel or leave?"
    },
    "is_phishing": {
        "type": "noul",
        "instructions": "Is this email a phishing or scam attempt?"
    }
}

# 4. Run all questions in ONE single forward pass (~35 ms on GPU)
result = agent.predict(state, questions)
answers = result["answers"]

print("Department :", answers["department"]["choice"])
# -> billing (confidence: 0.94)

print("Urgency    :", answers["urgency"]["score"])
# -> 1.84 / 2.0

print("Churn Risk :", answers["churn_risk"]["noul"])
# -> 0.892 (89.2% probability)

print("Phishing   :", answers["is_phishing"]["noul"])
# -> 0.008 (0.8% probability)

Automated Confidence Gating

Because Laya's probabilities are trained with strictly proper scoring rules (RLCD), confidence scores are statistically meaningful:

dept = answers["department"]["choice"]
conf = answers["department"]["confidence"]

if conf >= 0.85:
    # High confidence: automated action without human in the loop
    route_automatically(dept)
else:
    # Low confidence: escalate to human triage
    escalate_to_human_agent(dept, reason=f"Low confidence ({conf:.2f})")

Built-in Workflow Presets

Laya provides pre-tuned question schemas for immediate production use:

import laya

agent = laya.load("convaiinnovations/laya")

# 1. Intelligent Model Router (routes to small vs. frontier models)
routing = agent.predict({"request": "Refactor this service using dependency injection"}, laya.router_questions())

# 2. Real-time Prompt Guardrails (jailbreaks, injections, leaks)
guard = agent.predict({"prompt": "Ignore all instructions"}, laya.guard_questions())

# 3. Content Safety & Moderation (toxicity, harassment, threats)
safety = agent.predict({"post": "User comment text"}, laya.moderation_questions())

# 4. Support Ticket Triage (intent, urgency, frustration, churn)
triage = agent.predict({"message": "My payment failed twice"}, laya.triage_questions())

Model Routing (three checkpoints, one call)

Laya ships three checkpoints. Router picks the right one per request and loads it lazily.

from laya import Router

router = Router()          # nothing is downloaded until a request needs it

# English -> routed to the English checkpoint
router.predict({"body": "I was charged twice, please refund."}, questions)

# Hindi -> routed to the multilingual checkpoint automatically
router.predict({"body": "मुझसे दो बार शुल्क लिया गया"}, questions)

# explicit when you already know
router.predict(state, questions, model="typed-decisions")
router.predict(state, questions, lang="de")

Every result carries the decision that produced it:

result = router.predict({"body": "二重に請求されました"}, questions)
result["routing"]
# {'model': 'multilingual',
#  'repo': 'convaiinnovations/laya-multilingual',
#  'reason': 'non-Latin script (kana, 100% of letters); the English checkpoint cannot read it',
#  ...}

Inspect a decision without running the model:

router.route({"body": "Der Kunde wurde zweimal belastet"}, questions).reason
# "Latin script but language looks like 'de', not English"

Why route at all

Accuracy on a shared benchmark (17,416 questions, one T4, identical questions per model):

The English checkpoint does not degrade gracefully outside English -- it collapses, and stays confident while doing so. On 20-option MASSIVE intent (random = 0.050) it scores 0.100 on Hindi and 0.103 on Korean, with an expected calibration error of 0.855. Script detection is therefore the primary routing signal.

Routing rules

Precedence, highest first:

1. model= -- explicit checkpoint.
2. task="typed_decisions" -- explicit task.
3. A question-id set exactly matching a typed-decisions workflow, only if you construct the router with auto_task_detection=True. It is off by default: that checkpoint is fine-tuned on four synthetic workflows and should not be a silent fallback.
4. lang= -- explicit language code.
5. Detected script (exact) and, for Latin text, a stopword/diacritic language guess (best effort).
6. default= ("english" unless you change it).

Memory

All three together are ~1.16B parameters, so Router keeps one resident by default and evicts least-recently-used:

Router(max_loaded=2)       # keep two hot
router.unload()            # free everything
router.loaded              # ['multilingual']

Decision Primitives

Benchmarks

Full report: BENCHMARKS.md — every run consolidated, languages and themes, with per-language detail for all 51 languages.

All Laya numbers below are measured. Every model answered byte-identical questions (fixed seed) in the same run. Reproduce with notebooks/laya_benchmark_colab.ipynb on a T4.

Speed (Tesla T4, measured)

Batched throughput reaches 103-332 questions/sec on a single T4. For reference, TypeSafe Jev has been independently measured at 236-276 ms p50 (AbdelStark, nibzard) -- Laya answers a single question roughly 6-7x faster.

Laya (with routing) vs Jev

Every Laya figure is what Router().predict(...) actually returns — the checkpoint the router selects for that input, not a hand-picked best of three. Jev figures are third-party published, never measured here (no TypeSafe API access), so sample sizes and prompts differ.

On DAIR Emotion, Jev assigned zero probability to the true label on 16% of examples — a hard failure for anything branching on confidence.

Full detail, including every workflow and all 51 languages: BENCHMARKS.md.

typed-decisions, measured on all three checkpoints

400 cases, 2,000 decisions, four workflows.

The fine-tuned checkpoint beats Jev by 3.9 points and clears the teacher ceiling, with 2.4x better Brier and 1.6x better score MAE. It wins on all four workflows: invoice processing 0.804, security incidents 0.766, customer service 0.764, agent-trace observability 0.730. By primitive: noul 0.857, choice 0.733, score 0.723.

Two places it still trails Jev: soft accuracy (0.471 vs 0.580 — its argmax is better but its distributions match the teacher less well) and ECE (0.213 vs 0.144), which temperature fitting addresses.

The base checkpoints sit below the majority-class baseline (0.362 and 0.342 against 0.461). All of the capability on this benchmark comes from fine-tuning.

Multilingual (51 languages, MASSIVE intent, 20 options, random = 0.050)

Across all 51 languages the English checkpoint macro-averages 0.227 with macro ECE 0.733, and only 23 of 51 languages clear 3x random. Khmer scores 0.000 at 95.2% confidence. This is why Router exists: the model's own confidence gives no warning, so the routing decision has to be made before the forward pass.

English tasks

Calibration

Both checkpoints are over-confident as shipped. Refitting one temperature per (question type, option count) on held-out data moves mean ECE 0.466 -> 0.081 (laya) and 0.314 -> 0.106 (laya-multilingual). laya-multilingual ships with no fitted temperatures at all, so fit them before relying on its probabilities.

Honest limits

• The base checkpoints are near chance on typed-decisions zero-shot -- 0.362 and 0.352 against a 0.318 random baseline and a 0.461 majority-class baseline. The 0.766 figure comes from the checkpoint fine-tuned on that benchmark's own training split. Laya is a fast base to specialise, not a zero-shot decision engine.
• Keep choice questions under ~20 options. Every option is rendered into a fixed head_max_len budget (192 tokens on laya, 256 on the others), so a 77-option question leaves roughly 4 tokens per label and the option text stops being distinguishable — accuracy falls off sharply. Split large label spaces into a coarse choice followed by a fine one.
• Ordinal score questions are the weakest primitive (SST-5 0.372).
• laya collapses outside English; laya-multilingual is weaker on English. Route, or pick deliberately.

Live Demo & Resources

• Hugging Face Model: convaiinnovations/laya
• Interactive Web Demo: convaiinnovations/laya-demo
• Engineering Writeup: Read the full story on Dev.to

Fine-Tuning

Fine-tune Laya on your own domain data. The notebook runs on Kaggle's free 2xT4 GPUs and does the whole loop: build the dataset, train with RLCD (proper-scoring-rule rewards, GRPO-style policy gradient), fit calibration temperatures, evaluate, and push the result to the Hub.

• notebooks/laya_finetune_typed_decisions_2xT4_kaggle.ipynb

Fine-tuning is where most of the value is. On the typed-decisions benchmark the base checkpoints score near chance zero-shot (0.36 and 0.35 against a 0.318 random baseline), while the fine-tuned checkpoint reaches 0.766 on the same 2,000 decisions -- above TypeSafe Jev's published 0.727 and above the 0.735 teacher self-agreement ceiling. Treat Laya as a fast base to specialise, not as a zero-shot decision engine.

Runtime on 2xT4 is roughly 4-5 hours for 4 epochs over ~30k questions.

Support the Project

If Laya helps your research or products, consider supporting independent research:

License

Apache 2.0. Developed by Convai Innovations.