Supply motif models and a DNA length. Motif Balance searches for sequences that strengthen the weakest desired match while optionally limiting unwanted matches. Inspect the recovered sites, choose different arrangements, then vary the sequence within one selected arrangement. Scores describe agreement with the supplied models, not measured binding.
Documentation · Supply motifs · Python API · Recorded twelve-model example
Try a design
Fit the E. coli ArgR and Cra preferences into 25 bases. Their motif models span 25 and 14 positions. At the larger model’s width of 25 bases, the shorter match must fit entirely within the same DNA. The profiles come from Baumgart et al. (2021), Supplementary Data 2, which reports preferences inferred from DAP-seq.
1. Install and prepare the profiles
With uv installed:
# Create your own Python project and install Motif Balance from PyPI.
uv init --python 3.12 motif-example
cd motif-example
uv add motif-balance
# Download this release's example recipe and its source/checksum record.
curl -fLO https://raw.githubusercontent.com/e-south/motif-balance/v0.6.0/examples/argr-cra/prepare_inputs.py
curl -fLO https://raw.githubusercontent.com/e-south/motif-balance/v0.6.0/examples/argr-cra/SOURCE.json
# Fetch the publisher's data, verify it, and prepare the two local motif files.
uv run python prepare_inputs.py --out inputs
The preparation record explains how source probabilities become positive scoring probabilities. uv manages the environment and records the package dependency in your project.
2. Design and inspect DNA
Save this as design.py. A request names the desired models, DNA length, and
search allowance. Each candidate is scanned on both strands; its balance is the
weaker of the two best matches, each rescaled to its model's possible score range.
from motif_balance import DesignSpec, MotifSpecification, design
from motif_balance.formats.motif import read_motif
# Load the two prepared profiles. Each position retains preferences for A, C, G, and T.
argr = read_motif("inputs/motifs/argR.json")
cra = read_motif("inputs/motifs/cra.json")
# Seek strong matches to both models within the same 25-base sequence.
spec = DesignSpec(
specifications=(
MotifSpecification(motif=argr, direction="seek"),
MotifSpecification(motif=cra, direction="seek"),
),
length=25, # The wider motif spans all available DNA.
count=4, # Number of candidate sequences to return.
evaluations=4096, # Allowance for complete-sequence scores, shared by this run.
seed=7, # Repeat the same starting choices and search proposals.
)
# Search, save the result, and print each candidate's sequence and balance.
result = design(spec)
result.write("result")
for candidate in result.candidates:
print(candidate.sequence, round(candidate.balance_score, 3))
Run the script and draw the best candidate:
# Run the search in your project's environment.
uv run python design.py
# Rescore the saved candidate and draw its sites and motif logos on a duplex.
uv run motif-balance inspect result --format svg --view candidate --out candidate.svg
Open candidate.svg in an image viewer. This run's best balance is about 0.855.
Use new output names when repeating a run. SVG and HTML inspection need no extra
packages; Installation
covers optional PNG, GIF, and MP4 support and ordinary pip installation.
3. Select different site arrangements
Different sequences can have the same relative motif placement. Append this to
design.py before running it, or continue in the same Python session:
from motif_balance.alternatives import rank_architectures
# Use the sequences retained during search, including alternatives beyond the four returned.
pool = tuple(item.sequence for item in result.manifest.elites)
# Group by site order, strand, and overlap, then select two representatives.
ranking = rank_architectures(pool, spec, grouping="interval_topology")
selected = ranking.select(2)
for representative in selected:
print(representative.sequence, round(representative.balance_score, 3))
These representatives score about 0.855 and 0.801. Selection rescans the
saved pool without running another search. select(2) requires two available
arrangements; collections
explains how to allow and report a shortfall.
4. Vary a sequence within one arrangement
Continue with the first selected representative. The aim is now nucleotide variation while retaining each desired model's selected site and score.
from pathlib import Path
from motif_balance.variants import diversify
from motif_balance.formats.variants import variants_fasta, variants_tsv
# Protect each selected site's position and strand, allowing at most 0.02 score loss per model.
library = diversify(selected[0].sequence, spec, max_score_loss=0.02, max_variants=256)
# The compact template encodes exactly the concrete sequences checked together.
print(library.template, library.encoded_sequence_count)
print(library.minimum_balance, library.maximum_component_loss)
# Export every variant, its scores, and the complete verification record.
with Path("variants.fasta").open("x") as output:
output.write(variants_fasta(library))
with Path("variant-scores.tsv").open("x") as output:
output.write(variants_tsv(library))
with Path("library.json").open("x") as output:
output.write(library.model_dump_json(indent=2))
This parent yields sixteen checked sequences, with balance no lower than about 0.838. The cap includes the parent; other designs may yield only that parent. The tolerance concerns model scores, not binding affinity. See diversification for editable positions and the substitution map.
Inspect a larger design
The twelve-model example shows a recorded search in 60-base DNA. Playback connects saved states with smooth motion; displayed scores remain those of recorded sequences.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bda79928-4b92-4f5d-899a-a2c6df3daf72
Full-resolution MP4 · Inspect the final sequence
Motif Balance supports Python 3.12–3.14 on Linux and macOS. See Contributing for development and LICENSE for software reuse. If you use Motif Balance in research, cite the accompanying paper when available.
Metadata
Release files for motif-balance 0.6.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| motif_balance-0.6.0.tar.gz | 7.5 MB | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| motif_balance-0.6.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 7.7 MB
Release files / motif_balance-0.6.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | motif_balance-0.6.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 7.5 MB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
968a13240c95011d1790f3d8ddcc7968002b002abed5573657cf6029c70d7a84
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
c46eb0bde74902bcabeb995a91647f503f0634d9699e6b81e8dc4a88387b8ab8
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 26, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / motif_balance-0.6.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | motif_balance-0.6.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 193.1 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
fb9e65331efffdc1dbca4e39b4de0ccbf10adc1ca0be4745d182db49325fa064
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
c4df34a493d90b3434c064f6f25ebc410f0131040f8251d32f4cd8bb5af4501f
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 26, 2026.
Transparency log