Skip to main content

needtoknow

CI Docs License: MIT Python 3.10+ Dependencies: none

Permission-aware retrieval for RAG. Every user gets only the chunks they are allowed to read, whatever vector store, permission system or framework you use.

from needtoknow import PermissionedRetriever, MetadataACLAuthorizer, Subject

retriever = PermissionedRetriever(backend, MetadataACLAuthorizer())
result = retriever.retrieve("What are this year's salary bands?", Subject("bob", groups=["engineering"]), k=5)
# result.hits holds only chunks Bob may read. HR documents never reach the prompt.

Documentation · Security model · Benchmarks · Changelog

Why

A RAG assistant over company documents is only as safe as its retrieval step. If the vector search ignores who is asking, an engineer can ask the assistant about salaries and get HR documents summarised back. Every team building internal RAG has to solve this, and most solve it by hand, differently each time.

needtoknow is that layer as a small, tested library:

  • Works with what you have. Wrap any search backend and any permission system. The core has no dependencies.
  • Filters in the right place. When the permission system can describe "everything Bob may read" as a filter, the filter goes inside the vector search, so results are the true top-k of what Bob may read. When it cannot, candidates are checked after the search and the search widens until enough permitted results are found.
  • Fails closed. If the permission service errors, times out or returns malformed answers, the user gets an error, never unfiltered results.
  • Defence in depth. Pre-filtered results are checked again, so a backend bug that ignores the filter cannot leak. Each result reports how many such violations it caught.

Install

pip install needtoknow

Python 3.10 or newer: every Python version CPython still supports, each dropped in the first minor release after its end of life. Adapters for external systems install as optional extras.

Quickstart

from needtoknow import Document, InMemoryBackend, MetadataACLAuthorizer, PermissionedRetriever, Subject

backend = InMemoryBackend(
    [
        Document("handbook", "Annual leave is 25 days.", {"allowed_groups": ["*"]}),
        Document("salaries", "Salary bands for 2026 ...", {"allowed_groups": ["hr"]}),
        Document("runbook", "Roll back a failed deploy ...", {"allowed_groups": ["engineering"]}),
    ]
)
retriever = PermissionedRetriever(backend, MetadataACLAuthorizer())

result = retriever.retrieve("leave salary bands", Subject("bob", groups=["engineering"]), k=3)
print([hit.id for hit in result.hits])  # ['handbook']
print(result.strategy, result.complete)  # prefilter True

aretrieve is the async equivalent, with the same arguments and guarantees.

How it works

Strategy When Cost Result
prefilter The authorizer can return a filter and the backend supports filters One search The exact top-k of what the subject may read
postfilter Any authorizer Searches k × overfetch candidates, widening up to max_candidates Exact when enough permitted candidates exist; complete=False otherwise
auto (default) Picks prefilter when both sides support it

Every call returns a RetrievalResult with the hits plus strategy, examined, denied, violations (pre-filtered hits the re-check rejected, which should always be 0) and complete.

Integrations

Each integration is an optional extra, so the core stays dependency-free.

PostgreSQL + pgvector (pip install "needtoknow[pgvector]", pgvector 0.8+). The permission filter runs inside the SQL query as JSON containment tests, served by a GIN index, and iterative index scans keep HNSW returning k rows under selective filters.

from psycopg_pool import ConnectionPool

from needtoknow.backends.pgvector import PgVectorBackend, create_schema

pool = ConnectionPool("postgresql://localhost/app")
create_schema(pool, dim=768)
backend = PgVectorBackend(pool, embed=my_embedding_model)  # embed: str -> list[float]
backend.add(documents)

Chroma (pip install "needtoknow[chroma]"). The filter becomes Chroma's where clause. Each value in a permission list is stored as its own field rather than as a Chroma array, and an exact copy of the metadata is kept for the re-check: in chromadb 1.5.x, deleting a collection leaves its array metadata behind for new records in other collections to pick up (chroma-core/chroma#7594), which for permissions would be a leak.

import chromadb

from needtoknow.backends.chroma import ChromaBackend

collection = chromadb.PersistentClient(path="./chroma").get_or_create_collection("docs")
backend = ChromaBackend(collection)  # uses the collection's embedding function

Open Policy Agent (no extra dependency). Your Rego policy returns one decision per chunk, and can optionally return a filter so the vector store does the filtering. A complete policy is in examples/opa/needtoknow.rego.

from needtoknow.authorizers.opa import OPAAuthorizer

authorizer = OPAAuthorizer("http://localhost:8181", filter_path="needtoknow/filter")

OpenFGA (no extra dependency). Relationship-based access control in the Google Zanzibar style. Checks run in batches; for pre-filtering, ListObjects returns every document the user may view, and if that list may have been truncated the retriever post-filters instead. The subject's groups can be sent as contextual tuples, so memberships from your identity provider need no syncing.

from needtoknow.authorizers.openfga import OpenFGAAuthorizer

authorizer = OpenFGAAuthorizer("http://localhost:8080", store_id, resource_field="doc_id")

LangChain (pip install "needtoknow[langchain]"). NeedToKnowRetriever is a LangChain retriever, so it works in chains, agents and LangGraph tools; LangChainVectorStoreBackend turns any LangChain vector store into a needtoknow backend (post-filtered).

from needtoknow.langchain import NeedToKnowRetriever

retriever = NeedToKnowRetriever(retriever=PermissionedRetriever(backend, authorizer))
docs = retriever.invoke("What are this year's salary bands?", subject=Subject("bob", ["sales"]))

LlamaIndex (pip install "needtoknow[llamaindex]"). NeedToKnowRetriever for query and chat engines, PermissionNodePostprocessor for existing pipelines, and LlamaIndexBackend to wrap an existing index. Runnable examples for both frameworks are in examples/.

Filter values are strings or integers, the types permission identifiers use. That keeps every backend's answer identical to the reference semantics, which the test suite checks for each one.

Caching, audit and tracing

from needtoknow import CachingAuthorizer, JsonLinesAudit
from needtoknow.otel import OpenTelemetryObserver  # pip install "needtoknow[otel]"

retriever = PermissionedRetriever(
    backend,
    CachingAuthorizer(authorizer, ttl=30),  # a revoked permission stops granting access within 30 s
    observers=[JsonLinesAudit(audit_file), OpenTelemetryObserver()],  # audit_file: an open text file
    audit_key=b"...",  # optional: an HMAC of each query, so repeats can be matched without storing them
)

CachingAuthorizer caches pre-filters and per-chunk decisions per subject for ttl seconds and never caches an error; invalidate() drops decisions after a change you know about. Every retrieval, including failed ones, produces one RetrievalEvent (who asked, strategy, returned ids, denied and violation counts, duration, error type). Events never contain query or chunk text, and an observer that fails is logged without affecting retrieval.

Bring your own backend or permission system

A backend is any object with a search method:

class MyBackend:
    supports_filters = True  # set False if search() ignores `filter`

    def search(self, query: str, k: int, filter=None) -> list[Hit]:
        """Return hits best first. Translate `filter` (In / And / Or) into your store's filter."""

An authorizer answers two questions:

class MyAuthorizer:
    def check(self, subject, hits, action="read") -> list[bool]:
        """One decision per hit, in order. Raise on any doubt: the retriever fails closed."""

    def filter_for(self, subject, action="read"):
        """A Filter selecting everything the subject may read, or None if you cannot express one."""

Either can add async versions (asearch, acheck, afilter_for); otherwise the sync methods run in a thread under aretrieve. FunctionAuthorizer wraps a plain function.

Testing approach

The guarantees are tested as properties with Hypothesis: for randomly generated corpora, permissions, users and queries, every strategy must

  1. never return a chunk the user may not read,
  2. return exactly the top-k of what the user may read (checked against an independent oracle),
  3. stay safe when the backend ignores the filter, and
  4. give identical results through retrieve and aretrieve.

Benchmarks

On 57,600 real chunks (BEIR FiQA, Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B), across 33,000 retrievals, no needtoknow strategy returned a single forbidden chunk. Filtering inside the search kept recall@10 at 0.949 or better on pgvector for users who may read anywhere from 0.06% to 100% of the corpus, including when what they may read is far from what they ask about. Filtering after a top-10 search found almost nothing for selective permissions. Method, tables and caveats: Benchmarks.

Readable (far from the query) Naive top-k, then filter needtoknow postfilter needtoknow prefilter (pgvector)
0.9% 0.000 0.048 0.995
4.8% 0.000 0.314 0.950
20% 0.041 0.974 0.949

Stability and roadmap

1.0 is the stable base: the core, the pgvector and Chroma backends, the OPA and OpenFGA authorizers, the LangChain and LlamaIndex integrations, caching, audit events and tracing. The public API in the API reference follows semantic versioning: no breaking change without a major version and a deprecation period first.

Next, in rough order: permission sync from Google Drive, SharePoint and Confluence; Qdrant and Elasticsearch backends; SpiceDB and Cerbos authorizers. Contributions are welcome; see CONTRIBUTING.md.

Example deployment

examples/gateway is a complete, self-hosted, OpenAI-compatible gateway built on the same ideas: OPA policies, pgvector hybrid search with the ACL inside the query, PII pseudonymisation, prompt-injection quarantine and a hash-chained audit log. It is being ported onto this library.

License

MIT

Metadata

Release files for needtoknow 1.0.0

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for needtoknow 1.0.0
File Size Uploaded Provenance
needtoknow-1.0.0.tar.gz 42.8 kB With provenance Details

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for needtoknow 1.0.0
File Interpreter ABI Platform
needtoknow-1.0.0-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details

Total release size: 79.1 kB

Release files / needtoknow-1.0.0.tar.gz

Download URL needtoknow-1.0.0.tar.gz
Size 42.8 kB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
f5e992f920d8c357edb7d3f7adf5f93fde84ffa5f204501451607cb1525dbba6
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
2809c2c931e2905c7164f42b28aff56d97d271248d71dee305d5b9cafd42dd0d
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 16, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / needtoknow-1.0.0-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL needtoknow-1.0.0-py3-none-any.whl
Size 36.3 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
063563e9d29a546ab2780eab5bf3826632a6c364f1005b752884f7a2478326bc
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
5ae6eaf128a9eae201331506a3d12f84e6018e63cf3cdf407cc78487e6c9a7d2
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 16, 2026.

Transparency log

Security for needtoknow 1.0.0

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

Full provenance

All 2 files in this release have been uploaded with provenance metadata.

Select from 2 files

Attestation for needtoknow-1.0.0.tar.gz

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 16, 2026.

Transparency log

A note on package security

PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page