Skip to main content

Two-Key

AI agent authorization and MCP gateway — dual-path policy + judge approval, single-use capability tokens, and an encrypted ledger.

Two-Key — Authorization and execution control for AI agents

Two independent keys must turn before an AI agent can act.

tests build Code Coverage Latest Release License: Apache-2.0 Security Scan SemgrepCodeQL DeepSource

Two independent keys must turn before an AI agent can act.

🎯 The Problem

AI agents can be given permission to use a tool without being given authority to perform every consequential action that tool can perform.

Traditional tool permissions answer:

"Can this agent call this tool?"

Two-Key asks a different question:

"Is this specific action authorized to execute?"

Two-Key is an authorization layer for AI agents that use tools. Before a consequential tool call executes, Two-Key requires independent authorization through a deterministic policy path and an independent judge path:

  • The policy key (Path A). The rules you sign compile to bytecode. A small deterministic VM checks every call against fields read from the call's own arguments: the tool, the amount, the counterparty, the data class, and fields you define. It reads no prose, so no prompt can talk it out of a rule.
  • The judgment key (Path B). One or more AI judges, each with its own credential, review the call against your written constitution. Two-Key refuses to start with a judge that holds the agent's own credential.

Only when both keys turn does Two-Key issue a single-use token, bound to the exact arguments, the signed constitution, and the ledger state. The gateway runs the tool only with that token, and every decision, allowed or denied, is written to an encrypted, hash-chained ledger with a signed head.

What you get:

  • Works with the agent you have. Grok, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or a local Ollama model proposes the call as data; Two-Key decides.
  • Judges you choose. xAI, OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, or Ollama. One judge is enough to start; the high_assurance profile asks for judges from two makers and a yes from a local one.
  • In front of any MCP server (0.5.0). two-key mcp-proxy shows the agent only the tools you signed and runs every call through both keys.
  • Facts from your systems, not from the agent (0.5.0). A field such as "this invoice matches its purchase order" comes from your own lookup, and is looked up again just before the tool runs.
  • An audit trail you can check. AES-256-GCM at rest, a hash chain, a head signed by the principal and a witness key, and two-key audit.
  • A copy in your SIEM (0.7.0). Every decision can go to syslog or an HTTPS webhook as it is written, in Two-Key's own schema, ECS, or OCSF, with reason codes and digests but no argument values. A collector that is down never blocks a decision.
  • Keys you can recover. Passphrase backup of every key, in three bundles.
  • Small on purpose. Python 3.10 or later, one required dependency (cryptography), Apache-2.0.

Status: beta. 0.7.0 is the current release: it adds the SIEM export, a start-up check that refuses to run when the monitored agent is Two-Key's own account, and a count of the tokens the gateway refuses. 0.6.0 added Windows support, content scanning with your antivirus or DLP product, and a start-up check for paths another account could change. Maintainer-reviewed and tested with live LLM agents and judges. Read Known limits and docs/FIT.md before you rely on it.

Contents

Quick start

Install 0.7.0 from PyPI (docs/PYPI.md):

pip install "two-key[yaml]==0.7.0"

Tag v0.7.0 was not moved. It is the git snapshot from before this packaging, not a second release.

Or run the offline demo from a clone. It uses test-double judges, so it needs no API keys:

python3 -m venv .venv
. .venv/bin/activate
pip install -e ".[yaml]"
python -m two_key demo
python -m two_key authorize --help

Real judges are configured in examples/judges.yaml. The operator guide is docs/HOWTO.md. Before a real agent runs, close every way around Two-Key: docs/CONNECTING.md.

Put Two-Key in front of an MCP server

New in 0.5.0 (#2):

pip install "two-key[mcp]==0.7.0"

An MCP client (a desktop assistant, an IDE, an agent framework) normally starts an MCP server and calls its tools directly. With Two-Key, the client starts two-key mcp-proxy instead. The proxy starts the real server itself, shows the agent only the tools you signed, and runs every call through both keys before the server sees it. Facts such as a purchase-order match come from your own hook, never from the agent. A refused call comes back to the agent as a tool error with a reason code.

flowchart LR
  host["Agent host<br/>MCP client"] -- "tools/list, tools/call<br/>over stdio" --> tk
  subgraph proxy["two-key mcp-proxy, its own OS user"]
    tk["TwoKey.authorize<br/>Path A and Path B"] -- "token" --> gw["Gateway<br/>same process"]
    hooks["Fact hooks<br/>your code"] -- "facts" --> tk
  end
  tk -. "normalized record" .-> judges["Judges"]
  gw -- "projected arguments<br/>over stdio" --> up["Upstream MCP server<br/>child process, third OS user"]
  up --> sor["System of record"]
  hooks -. "look facts up" .-> sor

two-key mcp-draft-specs drafts the tool specs from the server's own schemas for you to review and sign. The walkthrough, with a worked example, is HOWTO "Put Two-Key in front of an MCP server". Run the proxy and the upstream server as separate OS users, so neither the agent nor the server can reach the proxy's keys (HOWTO "Key custody"). The proxy speaks stdio only and does not listen on the network; an agent on another machine starts it over SSH with a forced command (CONNECTING), a route that still needs live testing. From 0.7.0 the proxy refuses to start when the account that started it is Two-Key's own, is root, or can change Two-Key's files (on_agent_access).

Documentation

Read For
docs/FIT.md Whether Two-Key is the right control for you
docs/HOWTO.md Setup, configuration, the MCP proxy, and operations
docs/CONNECTING.md Connecting the agent and every hook so it cannot go around Two-Key, with a checklist
docs/SCANNERS.md Content scanning with your antivirus or DLP product (0.6.0)
docs/SIEM.md Sending the ledger to a SIEM, and checking a copy against it (0.7.0)
docs/JUDGES_AND_QUORUM.md How judges vote and how the two keys combine
docs/THREAT_MODEL.md Trust boundaries and residual risk
docs/SCOPE.md What is included, left out, and planned
docs/COMPARISON.md What Two-Key is not a substitute for
ROADMAP.md The path to 1.0
CHANGES.md Every change, with upgrade notes
SECURITY.md How to report a vulnerability
docs/PYPI.md Registering the package name and publishing a release

Components

  • Constitution: User/admin-configurable set of signed rules (prose, hard rules, and tool specs). The principal signs it; Two-Key enforces the signed form.
  • Policy Enforcer (Path A): Deterministic bytecode policy VM. It evaluates structured fields derived from the argument bytes according to the signed tool specs. It does not read free text or English.
  • Judge (Path B): Trusted AI agent (local or cloud, preferably suited to the use case). It scores the normalized action record (and optionally the proposal). It has no direct access to any registered tool.
  • Monitored Agent: The untrusted agent under constraint. It proposes actions; it has no direct access to any registered tool.
  • Tool Gateway: Accepts a single-use capability token and invokes the registered tool. It runs in the TwoKey process on the TwoKey ledger object (TwoKey.gateway()); a gateway in another process or on another host is not supported (#45). Its verifier holds only the capability public key, so it cannot mint. That is an API property, not key isolation.
  • Registered Tool: The tool protected by the dual-path authorization and the capability token.
  • MCP proxy (0.5.0; the mcp extra): two-key mcp-proxy sits between an MCP client and one upstream MCP server. It shows the agent only the signed tools, pins their schemas, and runs every tools/call through both keys and the in-process gateway. two-key mcp-draft-specs drafts the tool specs for the principal to review and sign. See HOWTO "Put Two-Key in front of an MCP server".
  • SIEM export (0.7.0): the ledger can copy each entry, as it is written, to a syslog sink or an HTTPS webhook, and two-key siem-export writes the same events to a file that two-key siem-verify checks back against the ledger. A per-kind field allowlist decides what leaves: reason codes, digests, sizes, the tool id, and the data class, never argument values or proposal text. See docs/SIEM.md.
  • Caller-supplied facts and the guard (0.5.0): a field declared source: caller gets its value from your integration (facts=), never from the agent's arguments, and is looked up again before the tool runs. two_key.guard.Guard does both lookups and both keys in one call for any agent loop; the MCP proxy runs on it. See HOWTO "Caller-supplied facts".

Dual-path authorization

  1. Path A is a policy VM. Hard rules compile to bytecode. The VM reads five built-in structured fields (tool, amount_usd, data_class, counterparty, and irreversible) and any custom fields the principal declares under fields: (boolean, integer, enum, or string; up to 64; see examples/custom_fields.yaml and HOWTO "Custom Path A fields"). It does not read English. A fault is a deny. A field's description is a signed note for people, never a rule. The signed constitution must include tool_specs. Those fields are read from the argument bytes by two_key/derive.py. A claim that disagrees with the bytes is a deny. Omitting tool_specs will not sign and will not load. A key the spec does not name does not reach the tool. deny_unmapped defaults off, so the call can still be allowed and that key is dropped at the gateway. The ledger records the dropped key names (dropped_keys), never their values. Set it true to deny the key instead. A payload path names a value that is not interpreted. It may not equal, contain, or sit under an amount, currency, or counterparty path; such a spec does not load. With no shape, it covers that value's children. shape may lock it to a string, a number, or a list of strings. max_length bounds a string or a list. Shape does not read the contents. The spec does not list every nested key. A counterparty path must list allow. A party that is not on that list is counterparty_not_allowed; an @example.org entry (0.5.0) admits every plain address at exactly that domain, with a signing warning. The tool receives the canonical party, not the raw spelling. Every tool maps each custom field a rule reads or marks it not_applicable, or the constitution does not sign (0.5.0), and a case: exact string field keeps a case-sensitive id as written. A value that cannot be read (for example 10**400) is a derive_failed deny, and any other exception in authorize is an internal_error: deny, written to the ledger.
  2. Path B is a judge quorum. Judges are hooks for xAI/Grok, OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, and Ollama. The minimum is one judge, and that judge must not be the monitored agent: it may run any model from any vendor, but never with the agent's credential, at any address. A missing, malformed, errored, or timed-out ballot does not count as yes. The default policy has no diversity floors. QuorumPolicy.high_assurance() (or profile: high_assurance in judges.yaml) needs judges from at least two model makers, at least one local judge, and a yes from a local judge; use it for destructive, irreversible, financial, or external-send tools. A judge's maker is who made its model, as the operator labels it (maker:, default: its provider). It is not verified, and it is a rule about the judges only: it is never compared with the monitored agent. require_local_yes with no local judge does not start. A judge is local only when it says so (local_weights: true) and its base_url host is on an allowlist: loopback, RFC 1918, or IPv6 unique-local. A :cloud/-cloud model is never local, for any judge class. With required_yes unset, the approval threshold is min(2, number_of_judges). The default policy permits a one-judge deployment, but the operator must still configure at least one judge; Two-Key does not create or select judges automatically. With one configured judge, one affirmative vote is required. With two or more judges, two affirmative votes are required by default. This is not a general majority rule: for example, a three-judge setup requires two affirmative votes, and a four-judge setup also requires two. Operators who want a different threshold, such as a majority or unanimity, must explicitly configure required_yes to the desired number of affirmative votes. With required_yes: 1 and more than one judge, one judge approves alone while the others are down; TwoKey warns at start, and min_responding closes it. require_path_a_first is not a floor and it is not a skip. After a derive deny, judges do not receive the argument bytes unless tool_args_on_derive_deny is set. A call that cannot be read under its spec (derive_failed:) then reaches no judge: there is nothing to judge, and Path B is ledgered as skipped:derive_failed. Other denies still go to the judges, with non-empty arguments attached.
  3. A short-lived single-use token is issued only if both paths allow. The token is signed by a capability key that lives outside the ledger directory, not by handing that private key to the gateway. It is bound to the tool, the argument hash, the ledger Merkle root at issuance, the constitution hashes, spec_hash, and the derived form. It lives ttl_seconds (default 120, at most 300). Redemption writes an intent before the tool runs, so a crash cannot run that token twice.
  4. The gateway redeems that token with the public half of the capability key. It does not hold the minting key, and it never scans. With a content scanner configured (0.6.0), Two-Key scans the call before the two keys decide, and the gateway checks the verdict and file digests the token binds. Tool output is not scanned.

Both paths answer once the call is well-formed, within limits, and readable under its spec. A Path A deny does not skip Path B, so the ledger has both results. A call that cannot be read (derive_failed:) is denied without asking the judges, unless tool_args_on_derive_deny lets them see its arguments. A malformed or oversized call (malformed_proposal, proposal_too_large, action_too_large, malformed_action:, args_too_large, invalid_call:) is denied before either path runs, and only its size and digest are ledgered. authorize_from_agent does not execute the tool. An agent is untrusted whether it is hosted locally or in the cloud.

Architecture

A monitored agent and a Path B judge do not call each other, and neither calls the gateway. The caller runs the agent. Two-Key then runs both paths once the call is well-formed and within limits. Only the gateway runs a tool.

flowchart TD
  constitution["Signed<br/>Constitution"] --> compile["Compile"]
  compile --> bytecode["Path A<br/>Policy"]
  compile --> judgeText["Path B<br/>Judges"]

  instruction["Untrusted<br/>Instruction"] --> agent["Monitored<br/>Agent"]
  agent -->|"JSON proposal<br/>or decline"| authorize["Two-Key<br/>Authorize"]

  authorize --> early{"Early deny?<br/>malformed / size<br/>agent_declined<br/>file limits"}
  early -->|yes| ledger["Encrypted<br/>Ledger"]
  early -->|no| derive["Derive fields"]

  derive -.->|"optional"| hook["AV/DLP<br/>Hook"]
  hook -.-> derive

  derive --> pathA["Path A<br/>Policy VM"]
  bytecode --> pathA

  derive --> pbCheck{"derive_failed:<br/>and no<br/>tool_args_on_<br/>derive_deny?"}
  pbCheck -->|yes| skipped["Path B<br/>skipped"]
  pbCheck -->|no| pathB["Path B — Judges<br/>≥1; configurable<br/>quorum"]
  judgeText --> pathB

  pathA --> gate{"Both paths<br/>allow?"}
  pathB --> gate
  skipped --> gate

  pathA --> ledger
  pathB --> ledger
  skipped --> ledger

  gate -->|no| ledger
  gate -->|yes| token["Single-Use<br/>Capability<br/>Token"]

  token --> gateway["Tool<br/>Gateway"]
  gateway -->|"verify"| tool["Registered<br/>Tool"]
  gateway --> ledger

  ledger -.->|"optional"| siem["SIEM<br/>syslog / HTTPS"]

MonitoredAgent.complete sends the constitution prose and the instruction. It does not receive Path A bytecode, judge credentials, or tool credentials. It receives tool_specs only as the opt-in, read-only vocabulary=tk.agent_vocabulary(tools=[...]): tool ids, argument paths, value syntax, floors, and data classes, never a value (no allow list, enum value, bound, or rule). The exact values a call needs, such as the payee id, come from the instruction or the prose (HOWTO "Designing a constitution"). Either way Path A checks every call. Its reply is data: tool, arguments, proposal, and optional structured fields, or a decline ({"decline": "<reason>"}), which is a ledgered agent_declined deny with no token and neither path run. Omitting data_class means classified, whatever the tool's floor is. Classes combine as a set: medical or financial on a personal tool stays medical or financial, both together are financial+medical, and only classified is classified (HOWTO "Data classes"). Extra keys are rejected. authorize_from_agent parses that JSON, records agent id, hosting, and trusted: false, and does not call the model again. Those fields are operator/library metadata (str, at most 256 characters after strip); non-str or oversize is a deny. Hosting is local or cloud. It is not trust, and it does not skip either path.

Path A reads only the structured fields: the five built-in ones and the declared custom fields, all derived from the argument bytes. Path B judges see the normalized action record. Non-empty tool arguments are attached on that record as tool_args, except after a derive deny. Set tool_args_on_derive_deny: true on the quorum policy to send those bytes anyway; without it, a derive_failed: call is not sent to the judges at all. A rule deny that is not a derive deny still attaches the arguments. The proposal string is not sent unless that judge has receives_proposal: true, or the quorum policy is judge_inputs: record_and_proposal. The code default, and examples/judges.yaml, is record_only.

Judges are loaded into TwoKey from their own config and their own API keys. The operator declares the monitored agent (monitored_agent: in judges.yaml, or TwoKey(monitored_agent=...)): its model, base_url, and credential. The agent's own report is never used. At start-up TwoKey resolves every judge and the agent to a normalized model (Unicode forms and dashes folded), the endpoint host:port, the upstream that serves it and how that was found (resolved_by: endpoint, model_prefix, or declared_upstream), scoped tenant ids (a tenant: mapping of organization, project, account, or deployment, plus what the URL shows), and a credential fingerprint under a per-install key, whitespace stripped (HMAC-SHA256 for an API token; PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256, 600,000 iterations, for a username and password, fingerprinted as one pair, and for any secret that contains :). Every credential a side holds is fingerprinted, sent or not.

A judge may run any model from any vendor. A judge is not the monitored agent, and TwoKey refuses to start (judge_matches_agent:), when it holds the monitored agent's credential (the same API token, or the same username and password), at any address: a credential identifies its holder wherever it is sent. Two sides that send no credential are the same agent only on the same address (the endpoint host:port, every alias of this machine folded to localhost), where nothing tells them apart. Everything else starts. Likely accidents are allowed with a two-key: WARNING: line on stderr and recorded in constitution_loaded (judge_agent_separation.warnings): the same model on the same address, the same model through a shared route or a local or unrecognized proxy with no declared upstream:, a shared tenant id, one side keyless on the same address, and an identity whose upstream cannot be resolved. Addresses are compared as configured; DNS names are not resolved. A username and password are sent as HTTP Basic over HTTPS only. allow_same_provider_judge and allow_same_model_distinct_tenant are accepted and have no effect. Without a declaration it refuses with monitored_agent_required:. Provider labels are never compared. HOWTO has the details.

Judges vote in parallel under one hard deadline. A missing, malformed, or timed-out ballot is an abstention, and an abstention is not a yes. No judge, no deadline, or two judges with the same id does not start. Each ballot is paired with its judge by position and takes its judge id from the judge; a ballot that names another judge abstains (judge_id_mismatch). A cloud judge makes the round deny when agent_session is missing. A judge is cloud when it is not on a loopback host, or when its model name ends in :cloud or -cloud, on any host (an Ollama cloud model served through localhost is still cloud). If that string equals the credential of any judge, local or cloud, wherever it connects, the ballot abstains with cloud_judge_reused_agent_session and the round denies. The credential named for the monitored agent is compared the same way on every call, so a placeholder does not hide that key. The key is not sent to the judge and not written to the ledger. A session that is not that key is still yours to pass. X-Two-Key-Judge-Session is a call id minted here. It is not a session at the model host.

Without a local judge, the constitution prose, the action record, and any attached tool arguments go to the cloud judges' vendors.

Judges do not enforce the allow lists or the data class; Path A does. judges.yaml and agents.yaml are trusted operator configuration: a callback auth entry imports the module it names, so whoever can write those files can run code in the TwoKey process.

Every decision in the ledger records policy_digest, the digest of the quorum policy in effect (opt-outs included, written in full once in constitution_loaded), and identities_digest, the digest of the resolved judge and agent identities written once in constitution_loaded: model, upstream, endpoint, tenant ids, and credential fingerprint, never a key.

Every JSON and YAML input is parsed strictly: a repeated key at any depth is refused, never last-one-wins, and so is a YAML merge key (<<), whose winning value the text does not show. An integer of more than 4,300 digits is refused or denied as invalid_call. Unknown top-level keys in judges.yaml or agents.yaml are refused. Tool arguments or a proposal over 256 KiB, or tool arguments, the action claim, or a structured proposal nested more than 62 levels, are denied before they are ledgered.

One call, in code order:

sequenceDiagram
  participant Caller
  participant Agent as Monitored agent
  participant TwoKey
  participant PathA as Path A VM
  participant PathB as Path B quorum
  participant Judge as Judges
  participant Ledger
  participant Gateway
  participant Tool

  Caller->>Agent: instruction, constitution prose, opt-in vocabulary (syntax only)
  Agent-->>Caller: JSON proposal or decline, no tool call
  Caller->>TwoKey: proposal and agent_session
  alt agent declined
    TwoKey->>Ledger: decision agent_declined, with the decline reason
    TwoKey-->>Caller: deny, neither path runs, no token
  end
  alt malformed or over a size limit
    Note over TwoKey: malformed_proposal, proposal_too_large,<br/>action_too_large, malformed_action,<br/>args_too_large, invalid_call, file limits
    TwoKey->>Ledger: decision with size and digest only
    TwoKey-->>Caller: deny, neither path runs
  end
  TwoKey->>PathA: structured fields (after optional scan / derive)
  PathA-->>TwoKey: allow or deny
  alt derive_failed and not tool_args_on_derive_deny
    Note over TwoKey,PathB: Path B skipped (ledgered skipped:derive_failed)
    TwoKey->>Ledger: proposal, path_a, path_b skipped
  else
    TwoKey->>PathB: action record and binding hashes
    Note over PathB: args omitted on derive deny unless tool_args_on_derive_deny
    Note over PathB: scan flag can also withhold args/proposal
    PathB->>Judge: score in parallel, own credentials
    Judge-->>PathB: yes, no, or abstain
    PathB-->>TwoKey: quorum pass or deny
    TwoKey->>Ledger: proposal, path_a, path_b
  end
  alt both allow
    TwoKey->>Ledger: capability_issued, then decision
    TwoKey-->>Caller: single-use token
    Caller->>Gateway: token, tool, arguments
    Note over Gateway: same process as TwoKey,<br/>verifies with capability public key only
    opt authenticated token refused
      Gateway->>Ledger: gateway_denied (reason, jti, tool, args size and digest)
    end
    Gateway->>Ledger: redemption_started
    Gateway->>Tool: registered function
    Gateway->>Ledger: redemption, or redemption_aborted on a tool exception
  else either path denies or skipped
    TwoKey->>Ledger: decision, no token
    TwoKey-->>Caller: deny
  end

The token is signed by the capability key (<ledger>.capability/capability.pem, outside the ledger directory). It is bound to the tool, the argument hash, the ledger Merkle root and size at issuance, the constitution hashes, spec_hash, and the derived form. The gateway is built with TwoKey.gateway() (or ToolGateway(tk.ledger, tk.issuer.verifier(), ...) in the same process); either way it keeps only the public half of the capability key. It recomputes the form from the same bytes. It checks the signature, expiry, a lifetime no longer than the TTL (ttl_too_long), an issue time at most 5 s ahead (issued_in_future), and that nothing revoked or reloaded the constitution after issuance. It writes redemption_started before the tool runs. It does not scan the bytes for sensitive text. The principal key still signs the constitution and the ledger head. A token signed with that principal key does not redeem, and a capability key equal to the principal key is refused. The capability key is created once, mode 0600 in a 0700 directory, and, like the witness key, is read only as a regular file that the group and others cannot read, never through a symlink. Once a token has been issued it is never regenerated: a missing or changed key refuses to start. Its fingerprint is recorded in constitution_loaded and the gateway checks it.

The gateway runs in the TwoKey process, on the ledger object TwoKey uses. Build it with TwoKey.gateway(). A gateway in another process or on another host is not supported (#45): a Ledger opened elsewhere does not see tokens issued after it opened, so it refuses them, and it would hold the principal, witness, and ledger keys anyway. A gateway built on a ledger no TwoKey in the process opened emits TwoKeyDeploymentWarning once per process.

The gateway's verifier holds only the capability public key, so the gateway object cannot mint. That is an API property, not key isolation. The same process holds the capability minting key (TwoKey.issuer) and, on the shared ledger object, the principal, witness, and ledger keys. The registered tools run in that process too. Python gives no memory isolation inside one process, so a compromised tool or dependency can read every one of those keys. Keep tools small and trusted, or put the work they do behind a service of their own.

What this repo leaves out

Not in this repository:

  • a scanning, antivirus, or DLP engine of its own
  • a SIEM, log management, or alerting product of its own
  • enterprise deployment modes and permissioned-chain anchoring
  • X.509 / PKI identities and agent assertions
  • seed-phrase backup
  • hybrid ML-DSA-65

Some of this is planned as optional additions. See the roadmap. DLP and antivirus hooks shipped in 0.6.0 (an interface that calls your antivirus or DLP product, not a scanning engine: docs/SCANNERS.md). The SIEM export, which shipped in 0.7.0, feeds the collector you run; it does not store, search, or alert (docs/SIEM.md). After 1.0 come PKI with certificate recovery and hybrid ML-DSA-65. Key backup shipped in 0.3.0 and is not seed-phrase backup. Enterprise deployment modes, permissioned-chain anchoring, and seed phrases are not planned.

The ledger is encrypted at rest.

Crypto here is Ed25519 and SHA-256 via the cryptography package. Ledger entries and the signed head are AES-256-GCM at rest. The data key is wrapped by a ledger key outside the ledger directory, not by the principal key. The head is signed by the principal and by a witness key, also outside the ledger directory. A stolen principal key alone cannot decrypt the log or sign a new head. The witness public key is pinned in the ledger (the first entry, witness_pinned), so a replaced witness.pem is refused (witness_key_changed). With the ledger key as well, the principal key can still rewrite the chain from its first entry, pin included, unless the operator also gives the witness public key as configuration (Ledger(..., witness_public_key=...) or --witness-public-key), kept where whoever writes the ledger directory cannot change it. With that pin, forging a head needs the principal, witness, and ledger keys together. The witness key changes only by a ledgered rotation (two-key rotate-witness). Status: beta (pre-1.0). It is maintainer-reviewed with live LLM testing and automated scanners (Semgrep, DeepSource, Bandit, CodeQL), not independently audited. It is not a FIPS 140-3 validated module.

Known limits

  • No independent review and no production deployment.
  • Two-Key verifies that the call that runs is the call both keys approved. It does not verify facts the agent asserts: a custom field read from the arguments (for example po_matched: true) is the agent's word. The tool or the integration must check such facts against the system of record (HOWTO "What Two-Key verifies"). From 0.5.0, a source: caller field takes the fact from the integration's own lookup instead; that fact is as good as the lookup, which Two-Key does not check.
  • No external anchor for the ledger. Someone holding the principal and ledger keys can rewrite a ledger that never leaves the machine, unless the witness public key is configured outside the ledger (--witness-public-key); then the witness key is needed too (#58). A head anchor outside the ledger directory (<ledger>.ledger-key/head.anchor, or --head-anchor) refuses a rollback or a wipe of the ledger directory alone (#62). It does not refuse them if that anchor is deleted or rolled back with the ledger. Someone who can write the anchor file can still do both. It is not an external anchor.
  • Not FIPS 140-3 validated. A FIPS approved mode that runs on a validated module is on the roadmap. It would not validate this package.
  • Signatures are Ed25519, which is not quantum resistant. Hybrid signatures are on the roadmap.
  • Identities are bare keys. There is no certificate chain, expiry, or revocation. PKI with certificate recovery is on the roadmap.
  • It is not an antivirus or DLP product. From 0.6.0 it can call one you run (docs/SCANNERS.md). Without one, a content leak in free text rests on the judges. Tool results are never scanned.
  • It is not a SIEM. From 0.7.0 it can send each ledger entry to the collector you run, over TLS by default; a plaintext sink is refused under high_assurance and warns otherwise. Whoever can read that collector reads ledger metadata, a collector that is down leaves the copy behind until it returns, and what the collector keeps or alerts on is yours, not Two-Key's (docs/SIEM.md).
  • Behind the MCP proxy, an agent that can reach the upstream server directly bypasses it, and an upstream server running as the proxy's OS user can read the proxy's keys. Run each as its own user (HOWTO "Key custody").
  • A key backup is only as strong as its passphrase. The bundle is the keys. PBKDF2 slows guessing and is not memory-hard. It is not a seed phrase and not an external anchor. A restore onto a newer ledger fills missing key files and leaves a key that is already there. --replace-ledger can make a token spent after the backup look unspent, and it replaces a key file that differs.

The full register is docs/THREAT_MODEL.md.

Roadmap

The MCP adapter shipped in 0.5.0; Windows support, DLP and antivirus hooks, and judge connection reuse shipped in 0.6.0. The ledger export for a SIEM shipped in 0.7.0; a public review and the 1.0 release come next. It states intent, not a promise: the order may change, and version numbers are targets, not dates. The detail, and what comes after 1.0, is in ROADMAP.md.

flowchart LR
  r04["0.4.0<br/>Released"] --> r05["0.5.0<br/>MCP adapter<br/>Released"]
  r05 --> r06["0.6.0<br/>DLP and AV hooks<br/>Released"]
  r06 --> r07["0.7.0<br/>Ledger export<br/>for SIEM<br/>Released"]
  r07 --> r10["1.0.0<br/>Review and release"]
  r10 -.-> after["After 1.0<br/>PKI, post-quantum,<br/>FIPS mode, local GUI"]
Version What Status
0.4.0 This repository and the package name two-key Released, tag v0.4.0
0.5.0 MCP proxy and spec drafter, caller-supplied facts, the guard core Released, tag v0.5.0
0.6.0 Windows support; DLP and antivirus hooks that call external scanners (ClamAV, ICAP products, a command, Python); judge connection reuse (#6) Released, tag v0.6.0
0.7.0 Ledger export for a SIEM: live syslog or webhook delivery and a verified file export, no argument values; a count of refused tokens kept outside the ledger Released, tag v0.7.0
1.0.0 Judge history summary (#1) and per-judge ballot records, then a public community review. Described as community-reviewed, not audited. The first PyPI upload is 0.7.0 Planned
After 1.0 PKI and certificate recovery, hybrid Ed25519 plus ML-DSA-65 signatures, FIPS approved mode, a local GUI, an optional reputation halt, more spec field types Not scheduled

Install and versions

Two-Key runs on Linux, macOS, and, from 0.6.0, Windows, with CI on all three (HOWTO "Platforms"). Version 0.7.0 is on PyPI. It is this beta, not the 1.0 community review. Tag v0.7.0 is not moved.

pip install "two-key[yaml]==0.7.0"

v0.7.0 adds the ledger export for a SIEM, a start-up check for the account the monitored agent runs as, and a count of the tokens the gateway refuses. main holds that release and the fixes merged since; working is where the next changes land. For the previous release, use @v0.6.0: Windows support, content scanning that calls your antivirus or DLP product (ClamAV, ICAP, a command, or Python), a start-up check for paths another account could change, and judge connection reuse. @v0.5.0 is the MCP proxy, the spec drafter, caller-supplied facts, the guard core, and constitution v3. @v0.4.0 is the 0.3.1 code under the new package name two-key. Tags v0.3.1 and earlier are in the archived two-key-concept repository, where v0.3.0 stays on e44be56, v0.2.4 on fc836bb, v0.2.3 on 4a4352e, and v0.2.0 on 2f756ac.

Upgrading from an older version: read the "Upgrading" notes in CHANGES.md for every version you skip.

  • 0.2.3 refuses the vendor: and min_vendors: keys, refuses some judges 0.2.2 accepted (one holding the agent's credential without sending it, or in the other form), and pins each ledger's witness key on its first open: "Upgrading from 0.2.2" (and "Upgrading from 0.2.1" and "Upgrading from 0.1.12" from older versions).
  • 0.2.4 writes a head anchor on the first open of an existing ledger and refuses a rolled-back ledger directory: "Upgrading from 0.2.3".
  • 0.3.0 adds key backup, custom Path A fields, and TwoKey.gateway() (#45). Existing ledgers and constitutions open unchanged: "Upgrading from 0.2.4". A constitution that declares custom fields signs as v2, which installs before 0.3.0 refuse: "Custom Path A fields" > "Upgrading".
  • 0.3.1 changes how data classes combine and adds agent declines: "Release v0.3.1" > "Upgrading".
  • 0.4.0 renames the package and its file formats. Key files still load; re-sign the constitution, start a new ledger, and export a new backup: "Upgrading from 0.3.1".
  • 0.5.0 adds constitution v3, for caller-supplied facts and the run 6 follow-ups. Check before upgrading: a constitution in which a tool neither maps nor marks not_applicable a field a rule reads no longer loads, and an allow entry that starts with @ is now a whole domain. A call that cannot be read under its spec is no longer sent to the judges. "Upgrading from 0.4.0" and the run 6 entries in CHANGES.md.
  • 0.6.0 loads 0.5.0 constitutions, ledgers, keys, and proxy.yaml files unchanged. Check before upgrading: at start it names each file or folder it runs or reads that another account could change, and under high_assurance it refuses to start until there are none. "Release v0.6.0" > "Upgrading from 0.5.0" in CHANGES.md.
  • 0.7.0 loads 0.6.0 constitutions, ledgers, keys, and proxy.yaml files unchanged, and sends nothing without a siem setting. Check before upgrading: under high_assurance a plaintext syslog sink (udp or tcp) refuses to start, and the proxy refuses to start when the monitored agent runs as Two-Key's own account or can change Two-Key's files. "Release v0.7.0" > "Upgrading from 0.6.0" in CHANGES.md.

A clone installed with pip install -e follows the ranges in pyproject.toml. CI does not: it installs the versions in uv.lock (cryptography, PyYAML, the MCP SDK for the mcp extra, and their dependencies), wheels only. To match CI, use the uv version pinned in .github/workflows/tests.yml:

pip install --only-binary :all: "uv==0.13.0"
uv sync --locked --no-build --extra yaml --extra mcp --no-dev
.venv/bin/python -m unittest discover -s tests

Layout

The middle column on the GitHub file list is the last commit that touched that file, not a description of the file. This table is the description.

Path What
two_key/core.py TwoKey.authorize and authorize_from_agent
two_key/audit.py check_decision_digests: recompute each decision's identities_digest and policy_digest
two_key/policy_vm.py, compiler.py Path A
two_key/derive.py Tool-spec derivation for Path A's form
two_key/fields.py Custom Path A fields: registry, types, character sets, limits
two_key/quorum.py, two_key/judges/ Path B and judge transport
two_key/identity.py, netloc.py Judge ≠ monitored agent check; local vs. cloud host
two_key/strict.py Strict JSON and YAML loading (duplicate keys, merge keys, and huge integers refused)
two_key/agents.py Monitored-agent hooks
two_key/ledger.py Encrypted ledger; ledger key and witness live outside the directory
two_key/capability.py, gateway.py Tokens and redemption. The gateway verifies only.
two_key/guard.py One guarded call through both keys, with caller-supplied fact hooks (any agent loop; the MCP proxy uses it)
two_key/siem.py, siem_sinks.py, siem_export.py SIEM export: the per-kind field allowlist and schemas, the syslog and webhook sinks, and the file export and its offline check
two_key/scan.py, scanners.py Content scanning: the core, and adapters for ClamAV, ICAP, a command, and Python
two_key/_platform.py, writable.py Owner-only files, locks, and no-follow opens on POSIX and Windows; the start-up check for paths another account could change
two_key/mcp_proxy/ MCP proxy and spec drafter (mcp extra). config.py and core.py decide; sdk.py is the only module that imports the MCP SDK; draft.py drafts specs
two_key/keys.py, cli.py, backup.py Key files; two-key command line; passphrase backup of the package's own keys
two_key/action.py Normalized action record and its validation
two_key/agent_meta.py Bounds on operator- or library-supplied agent identity metadata written to the ledger
two_key/canonical.py Canonical encoding for the ledger, tokens, and judge bindings
two_key/constitution.py Signed constitution: prose for Path B, hard rules for Path A, and tool specs
two_key/testing.py Offline test doubles only; not real judges
examples/ Constitution, hard rules, custom fields, judges, agents, and the Elastic SIEM example
pyproject.toml Package name two-key, version, dependencies, extras, and the two-key command
MANIFEST.in Docs and examples included in the source distribution. The wheel is only two_key
docs/PYPI.md How to register the name and publish with trusted publishing, without a token in the repo
.github/workflows/pypi-publish.yml Build, metadata check, SBOM, and the tokenless upload. The file is on main; a run publishes only from branch PyPI or a matching version tag

History and license

Development moved here from the archived two-key-concept repository at 0.3.1; its history is preserved in this repository.

Apache License 2.0. See LICENSE.

Metadata

Release files for two-key 0.7.0

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for two-key 0.7.0
File Size Uploaded Provenance
two_key-0.7.0.tar.gz 2.0 MB With provenance Details

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for two-key 0.7.0
File Interpreter ABI Platform
two_key-0.7.0-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details

Total release size: 2.2 MB

Release files / two_key-0.7.0.tar.gz

Download URL two_key-0.7.0.tar.gz
Size 2.0 MB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
0bb3f87e3cda4e408ed9a059e0e41abb0471fde6355fe7d4c007f55d7c62548d
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
c7501b3989c648b528498e03bf6bafa866512c35e047851948a81af6724455cc
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 17, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / two_key-0.7.0-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL two_key-0.7.0-py3-none-any.whl
Size 272.8 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
fd0614ea309c8576d329a19c561b904b07112b3f64ac644adbe0c4190f732865
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
ecb53d4f4808278ddeb9737f19fdaf8890c25f3b9a82c4c81eb731dcca4d7fbc
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 17, 2026.

Transparency log

Security for two-key 0.7.0

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

Full provenance

All 2 files in this release have been uploaded with provenance metadata.

Select from 2 files

Attestation for two_key-0.7.0.tar.gz

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 17, 2026.

Transparency log

A note on package security

PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.

To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page