Verfy CLI
Guard coding-agent tool calls, scan and lock MCP tools, and sign a verifiable receipt for every action. Plain Python (≥ 3.10), no required dependencies, MIT.
curl -fsSL https://verfy-tech.vercel.app/install.sh | sh # macOS, Linux: standalone build, Python included
irm https://verfy-tech.vercel.app/install.ps1 | iex # Windows PowerShell: the same
pip install verfy # Python ≥ 3.10, no dependencies
pip install "verfy[fast]" # optional: faster Ed25519 via `cryptography`
Guard Claude Code
verfy init # ~/.verfy: signing key (0600), starter policy
verfy hook install # shows the change to ~/.claude/settings.json
verfy hook install --write # saves it (a backup is kept); --project for ./.claude/settings.json
Claude Code then runs verfy hook pre-tool-use before every tool call. The agent cannot switch Verfy off through what Verfy sees: changes to the hook settings, verfy.lock, the policy, ~/.verfy or the Verfy install are denied, changes to MCP configs need approval, and so do verfy lock approve, verfy lock check --update, verfy init --force and pip uninstall verfy when the agent runs them (denied). Verfy answers deny or ask with the rule and reason, or stays silent so Claude Code's own permissions decide; it never answers allow itself. Any error becomes ask (or deny with "fail_mode": "deny"). The hook never touches the network.
Update
verfy update # install the newest version (standalone build, pip, pipx or uv: whichever you used)
verfy update --check # only report; exit 1 when a newer version exists
verfy update --auto on # once a day, when you run a verfy command, update in the background (off: --auto off)
verfy init asks which you prefer the first time; the default is manual, so Verfy never goes online on its own. The hook, the gateway and verfy sync never check for updates.
Guard MCP servers (gateway)
claude mcp add filesystem -- verfy proxy --name filesystem -- npx -y @modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem@2025.8.21 ~/project
verfy wrap ~/.cursor/mcp.json --write # wrap every server in a config (backup kept)
The gateway scans each tools/list answer, hides poisoned or drifted tools, checks every tools/call, can ask the user through MCP elicitation ("on_ask": "elicit"), and writes a receipt for every call.
Scan
verfy scan --discover # static check of Claude Code, Cursor, Claude Desktop configs
verfy scan --discover --live # also start each stdio server and scan its tools
verfy scan tools.json --fail-under C # a saved tools/list answer, for CI
Exit codes: config scan 0 ok, 1 medium, 2 high or worse; tool scan 1 with --fail-under when a server grades worse.
Lock
verfy lock status # 0 ok · 1 new/removed · 2 drift
verfy lock diff filesystem # what changed, invisible characters spelled out
verfy lock approve filesystem # review, then accept (--yes after reviewing in CI)
verfy lock add tools.json --server remote-api
verfy lock verify # verfy.lock is well formed and untampered
A project-level ./verfy.lock is used when present, otherwise ~/.verfy/verfy.lock.
In CI
verfy lock check --update # start the servers in .mcp.json, review every definition, write ./verfy.lock
verfy lock check # 0 ok · 1 new/removed · 2 drift · 3 a server did not answer
Commit verfy.lock; a pull request that changes a tool then fails until someone reviews the diff and runs --update. Inside GitHub Actions the command also writes annotations and a step summary. The repository root has an action.yml that installs this CLI and runs the check:
- uses: actions/setup-python@v7
with: { python-version: "3.13" }
- uses: ./ # or <owner>/verfy@<ref> once the repository is public
with: { config: .mcp.json, lock: verfy.lock }
lock check starts each stdio server command from the config, as your MCP client would: pin package versions and pass keys as CI secrets. Remote servers are skipped.
Check and verify
verfy check "git push --force" # 0 allow · 1 ask · 2 deny
verfy check --tool send_payment --args '{"amount": 500}'
verfy ledger show
verfy verify # your own ledger
verfy verify --ledger receipts.jsonl --pub <key> --kid <chain> [--start-after <hash>] # an evidence export
Verfy Team
verfy team enroll --url https://verfy.example.com --code atle_… # code from Dashboard → Devices
verfy sync # upload new receipts (run from cron/CI, never in the hook)
verfy team pull # team policy + team-approved locks
verfy team propose SERVER TOOL # ask admins to approve a changed tool
verfy team status
Only the public key is sent at enrollment. The device token is stored in ~/.verfy/team.json (0600). Receipts are uploaded exactly as signed; they contain only hashes of arguments unless you enabled receipts.include_args, in which case sync needs --allow-args.
Policy
JSON merged over src/verfy/data/default_policy.json. Precedence: --policy FILE, ./verfy.policy.json, ~/.verfy/team/policy.json, ~/.verfy/policy.json.
{
"on_ask": "deny",
"fail_mode": "ask",
"tools": {"deny": ["github/delete_*"], "ask": ["merge_pull_request"]},
"network": {"allow": ["github.com", "*.python.org"], "unknown": "ask"},
"rules": [{"id": "no-prod-db", "pattern": "prod-db", "verdict": "deny", "message": "Production is off-limits."}],
"lock": {"on_new": "ask"},
"receipts": {"include_args": false}
}
Receipt format (verfy.receipt/1)
One JSON object per line in ~/.verfy/ledger.jsonl: v, id, seq, prev, issued_at, agent, session, action{server, tool, kind, args_sha256, args?}, decision{verdict, rules, policy_sha256, approved_by?}, outcome{status, result_sha256}, tool_sha256, kid, sig. sig is Ed25519 over the canonical JSON of all other fields; prev is the SHA-256 of the previous receipt. Writes are serialized with an OS file lock, so parallel sessions never fork the chain.
SCITT signed statements
verfy scitt export --out statements/ [--issuer URL] # one COSE_Sign1 per receipt
verfy scitt verify statements/*.cose --pub signer.json # COSE signature, CWT subject and the receipt's own signature
Each statement is a COSE_Sign1 (RFC 9052) with alg EdDSA, content type application/json, the key id and CWT claims (iss, sub = the receipt hash) in the protected header, and the canonical receipt as payload: the signed-statement envelope of the IETF SCITT architecture draft. Verfy does not run a transparency service or issue SCITT receipts.
Tests
cd verfy-cli && python -m unittest discover -s tests # needs Node for the cross-engine tests
Limits
Rules are pattern matching, not a sandbox. Verfy sees only calls that pass through its hook or gateway. A receipt proves what Verfy decided and that the log was not edited, not what a tool did internally. Keep ~/.verfy/key.json private.
Metadata
Release files for verfy 0.3.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | Provenance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| verfy-0.3.0.tar.gz | 85.4 kB | Without provenance | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| verfy-0.3.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 162.5 kB
Release files / verfy-0.3.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | verfy-0.3.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 85.4 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
039ef459558f70c5228d42e52d245c79395262bcb7dfdcc691901da8767fa218
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
d1f8de6a2b60392044159a640d13965b41232d0b82c5d0f86b60c5fa27f2d164
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Release files / verfy-0.3.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | verfy-0.3.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 77.1 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
63244b0fda86da9d1a6da0e966d3b4d25e88f0086391ee45b57d9af0503019f4
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
9fdcc16476d790ee57379da1272169a51e37ad7432e141018835304270bd9162
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Security for verfy 0.3.0
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
No provenance found
None of the files in this release were uploaded with provenance metadata.
A note on package security
PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.
To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.