woodpecker-mcp
woodpecker-mcp exposes a materialized service dependency graph as an MCP toolset. It provides an LLM-based agent such as HolmesGPT with a capability those agents do not retain on their own: a persistent, queryable graph of how services depend on one another. Root-cause analysis therefore becomes a deterministic graph traversal rather than a conclusion re-derived on each investigation.
HolmesGPT remains unmodified. It launches woodpecker-mcp as a subprocess (or connects over HTTP) and discovers the tools it exposes - no fork, custom image, or plugin is required.
Why this exists
HolmesGPT markets a "Runtime Dependency Graph", yet its source holds no graph data structure, no graph database, and no graph-traversal code. Each investigation infers the relationships on the fly - from traces, Kubernetes owner-refs, and metric labels - then discards them, and root cause is whatever the model concludes through a "five whys" prompt. That design is deliberate - it buys freshness, statelessness, and breadth - but it carries costs that a materialized graph removes:
| Holmes (inferred) | woodpecker-mcp (materialized) | |
|---|---|---|
| Where relationships live | model context, one investigation | a graph database (FalkorDB) |
| Root cause | reasoned per run (non-deterministic) | deepest-failing-service, one Cypher query (exact, repeatable) |
| Blast radius | re-derived each time | variable-length path traversal |
| Explore it yourself | no | yes (browser UI + Cypher) |
| Blind-spot detection | no | yes |
How it works
flowchart TD
H["MCP client (e.g. HolmesGPT)"] -->|stdio or HTTP| S["server.py - FastMCP tools"]
S -->|refresh| B[build.refresh]
S -->|diagnose| D[diagnose.py]
B -->|reads live state| C["sources/<br/>topology: docker / k8s / traces<br/>metrics: prometheus / datadog"]
B -->|materializes| G[("FalkorDB<br/>dependency graph")]
D -->|"Cypher: roots, blast radius, paths"| G
The graph is rebuilt from live sources on each query (or from a static topology file), then all reasoning runs as Cypher against the store.
Quickstart
HolmesGPT already ships the MCP client, so wiring is config-only - no fork, image, or plugin to build. Install, then let woodpecker-mcp configure itself:
pip install holmesgpt woodpecker-mcp
woodpecker-mcp init # guided Q&A -> writes a filled-in .env
woodpecker-mcp setup # starts the graph backend, waits until ready, registers the toolset
holmes ask "find the root cause of the current incident"
init asks a few questions (graph backend, topology, metrics) and writes a
.env. setup starts FalkorDB and merges the woodpecker-graph toolset into
~/.holmes/config.yaml, so holmes ask picks it up automatically - no -t flag
needed.
Other setups, all in the integration guide: no Docker or air-gapped (the embedded Kuzu backend), wiring the toolset YAML by hand, in-cluster over HTTP for the Holmes Operator, and the full configuration reference.
Tools
| Tool | Returns |
|---|---|
woodpecker_get_topology |
the materialized graph (services, status, deps) |
woodpecker_diagnose_root_cause |
deepest-failing-service + causal chains + blast radius + blind spots + page verdict |
woodpecker_get_blast_radius(service, direction) |
transitive upstream/downstream closure |
woodpecker_get_service_health(service) |
per-service drill-down |
woodpecker_detect_blind_spots |
healthy-but-unmonitored services |
Explore the graph
FalkorDB ships a browser. Open http://localhost:3000, pick the woodpecker
graph, and run OpenCypher visually, e.g. the blast radius of db:
MATCH (a:Service)-[:DEPENDS_ON*1..20]->(:Service {name:'db'}) RETURN a
Or from Python:
from falkordb import FalkorDB
g = FalkorDB(host="localhost", port=6379).select_graph("woodpecker")
g.query("MATCH (a:Service)-[:DEPENDS_ON*1..20]->(:Service {name:'db'}) "
"RETURN a.name").result_set
CLI (standalone)
woodpecker-mcp topology # rebuild + print the service graph
woodpecker-mcp diagnose # rebuild + print root-cause analysis
woodpecker-mcp refresh # rebuild the graph only
woodpecker-mcp serve [--http] [--port 8000] # run the MCP server
# study a topology offline, no live infra:
woodpecker-mcp ingest examples/topology.example.json
WP_AUTO_REFRESH=0 woodpecker-mcp diagnose
Configuration
Everything has a working default; set only what points at your infra. Run
woodpecker-mcp init to generate a .env from a guided Q&A (or start from the
fully-commented .env.sample - same content init --defaults
writes), or put the WP_* vars in the toolset's env: block. Three independent
seams, mixed and matched:
- graph (
WP_GRAPH_BACKEND):falkordb(server, default) orkuzu(embedded, no Docker - good for air-gapped) - topology (
WP_TOPOLOGY):docker,k8s, ortraces(Jaeger) - metrics (
WP_METRICS_BACKEND):prometheus(or any PromQL-compatible backend) ordatadog
Either graph backend sits behind one GraphStore interface (Neo4j/Memgraph drop
in the same way). Every variable, with per-backend deep-dives, validation
commands, and troubleshooting, is in
docs/CONFIGURATION.md.
Layout
woodpecker_mcp/
server.py FastMCP tools, stdio + HTTP
store.py GraphStore interface; FalkorGraphStore (default), KuzuGraphStore
build.py rebuild the graph from sources, or ingest a static topology
diagnose.py deterministic root-cause verdict from store queries
sources/ TopologySource (docker, k8s, traces) + MetricsSource (prometheus, datadog)
schema.py status vocabulary
snapshot.py timestamped diagnose snapshots (postmortem/audit trail)
topomem.py topology memory - deleted services stay visible as down
cli.py init | setup | serve | topology | diagnose | refresh | ingest
scaffold.py init/setup helpers (.env, FalkorDB, Holmes config)
examples/ holmesgpt-toolset.yaml, k8s-deployment.yaml, topology.example.json
docs/ CONFIGURATION.md
benchmark/ Holmes-vs-Holmes+woodpecker benchmark: harness, raw logs, EVIDENCE.md
tests/ unit tests (test_*.py) + smoke_mcp.py (integration)
Development
pip install -e ".[dev]" # pytest + ruff
pre-commit install # ruff lint on every commit
pre-commit install --hook-type pre-push # unit tests before every push
pytest # unit tests - no services needed
ruff check . # lint (ruff format . to auto-format)
Unit tests (tests/test_*.py) run offline against fakes; the graph-store suite
is parametrized over both backends (Kuzu embedded, FalkorDB via a live server)
and skips whichever is unavailable - set WP_TEST_REQUIRE_BACKENDS=1 (CI does)
to hard-fail instead of skipping. The stdio integration check needs a live
FalkorDB:
docker run -d -p 127.0.0.1:6379:6379 -p 127.0.0.1:3000:3000 falkordb/falkordb:v4.18.11
python tests/smoke_mcp.py
License
woodpecker-mcp is licensed under Apache-2.0. It connects to FalkorDB as a client and does not redistribute it; FalkorDB itself is SSPL-licensed (source-available) - fine for self-hosting, relevant only if you offer FalkorDB as a managed service.
Metadata
Release files for woodpecker-mcp 0.2.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | Provenance | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| woodpecker_mcp-0.2.0.tar.gz | 67.0 kB | With provenance | Details for woodpecker_mcp-0.2.0.tar.gz |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Actions Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| woodpecker_mcp-0.2.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details for woodpecker_mcp-0.2.0-py3-none-any.whl |
Total release size: 119.4 kB
Release files / woodpecker_mcp-0.2.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | woodpecker_mcp-0.2.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 67.0 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
1e15a0aba003b97602bc7d5fd0930d29ee1eec194b390517a82a6d4b4e9f827c
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
2141da059aca4ce40c10b1903c276de4411950ce2a018fe2beb9ad963b4150d3
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.12
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Jul 2, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / woodpecker_mcp-0.2.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | woodpecker_mcp-0.2.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 52.4 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
f5b675947c9a7fc6e70e93cad76cb518d95495fa8e20e7c1c69365b6fbe8f17b
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
c061d7df209ef8840e5f5a6d6adb950d7b22048668b96e2201add6314eeb797f
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/6.1.0 CPython/3.13.12
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Jul 2, 2026.
Transparency logSecurity for woodpecker-mcp 0.2.0
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
Full provenance
All 2 files in this release have been uploaded with provenance metadata.
Attestation for woodpecker_mcp-0.2.0.tar.gz
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Jul 2, 2026.
Transparency logA note on package security
PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.
To learn more about protecting yourself from malicious actors, visit our package security documentation.