dialectical-framework 1.4.1

A dialectical framework for augmented intelligence. AI reasoning powered with dialectics supports humans in: system optimization (psychology, engineering, business, politics, etc.); dispute resolution (mediation, conflicts, negotiations, etc.); decision-making (dilemmas, challenging situations, win-win, etc.).

Dialectical Framework

A reasoning framework for AI applications that need structured dialectical analysis. It curates a graph database through LLM-guided conversation, building up thesis-antithesis-synthesis structures from any domain.

The graph database is the state. Every interaction — extracting theses, finding oppositions, building wheels — writes semantic nodes and relationships into the graph. The framework is essentially a curation engine: an LLM orchestrator that progressively structures user input into dialectical knowledge graphs.

How It Works

1. Input — User provides text, URLs, or ideas
2. Analysis — LLM extracts theses, finds antitheses, generates aspects (T+, T-, A+, A-)
3. Graph curation — Each insight is committed as nodes/relationships in the graph database
4. Exploration — Perspectives are combined into Cycles, arranged into Wheels, and Transformations reveal paths toward synthesis

The graph accumulates structured reasoning over time. Applications query it, visualize it, or build on it.

Architecture

Host Application (Chainlit, API, CLI)
        │
        ▼
    Orchestrator (LLM + tools)
        │
        ▼
    Graph Database (Memgraph / Neo4j)

The Orchestrator is the main entry point. It manages an LLM conversation with tools that read and write the graph. The host app controls persona and session identity; the framework handles reasoning and graph curation.

Core Graph Structure

At the heart is the Dialectical Wheel — a semantic graph where nodes are statements and edges encode dialectical relationships (opposition, complementarity, transformation).

Structure	Role
Statement	Atomic unit of meaning
Perspective	T/A opposition with aspects (T+, T-, A+, A-)
Cycle	Ordered sequence of Perspectives
Wheel	Concrete T-A arrangement implementing a Cycle
Transformation	Action-Reflection paths between segments
Synthesis	Emergent S+/S- from the Wheel's circular causality

Think of a Wheel as a pizza: segments are slices (T, T+, T-), Perspectives are half-pizzas (thesis + opposing antithesis), and Transitions are the cuts between slices.

Simple	Detailed

Why a Reasoning Graph

Most AI systems treat knowledge as flat context — dump text into the prompt and hope the LLM figures out the structure. The dialectical framework builds a persistent reasoning graph where the structure itself encodes how to think about a domain:

• Oppositions are explicit. The LLM doesn't need to discover tensions — they're mapped as T/A pairs with typed aspects showing where each side overreaches (T-, A-) and where it constructively balances the other (T+, A+).
• Transformations encode causality. Edges don't just connect — they show how one position's failure becomes another's strength. This is the circular causality that drives synthesis.
• Quality is measurable. Complementarity, modality balance, area metrics tell the LLM which reasoning paths are well-developed and which are thin — no guessing about confidence.
• Knowledge compounds. Each new perspective enters an existing graph of validated reasoning. The LLM builds on prior synthesis rather than re-deriving from scratch.

The result: an LLM with this graph in context doesn't just have facts about a topic — it has the intellectual terrain mapped. What opposes what, where balance was achieved, what assumptions remain untested, and where synthesis is possible.

This is the LLM Wiki pattern realized as a semantic graph rather than a pile of markdown files — knowledge that is structured, rule-validated, and queryable by reasoning topology.

Integration

The framework is designed as a drop-in reasoning engine for AI applications that need dialectical analysis — decision support, systems thinking, mediation, ethical modeling.

from dialectical_framework.dialectical_reasoning import DialecticalReasoning
from dialectical_framework.settings import Settings
from dialectical_framework.agents.orchestrator.orchestrator import Orchestrator

# Initialize once
DialecticalReasoning.setup(Settings.from_env())

# Per-session usage
orchestrator = Orchestrator(app_preamble="You are a systems thinking coach...")

async for event in orchestrator.chat_stream("Analyze the tension between growth and sustainability"):
    # ThinkingDelta, TextDelta, ToolStart, ToolResult, ResponseComplete
    handle(event)

Setup

Requirements

• Python 3.11+
• Memgraph or Neo4j
• An LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, or any LiteLLM-compatible)

Install

poetry install

Environment Variables

Variable	Description	Example
DIALEXITY_DEFAULT_MODEL	Model in provider/model format	bedrock/anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-20250514-v1:0
DIALEXITY_GRAPH_DB_VENDOR	Graph database	memgraph (default) or neo4j
DIALEXITY_GRAPH_DB_HOST	Database host	127.0.0.1
DIALEXITY_GRAPH_DB_PORT	Database port	7687
DIALEXITY_THINKING_LEVEL	Extended thinking budget	medium, high, max (optional)

Store in .env or export in your environment.

Run Tests

poetry run pytest              # All tests (LLM mocked)
poetry run pytest -m llm       # Only LLM-path tests (mocked)
poetry run pytest --real-llm   # Hit real LLM provider

Built With

• Mirascope — LLM abstraction
• GQLAlchemy — Graph ORM
• dependency-injector — DI container

Learn More

• Dialectical Wheels Overview
• Dialectical Ethics
• Earlier Work

Applications

• Eye Opener — Analyze text, reveal hidden assumptions
• Argument Inspector — Deep-dive into case arguments for analysts and mediators