Skip to main content
Pre-release

This release is a pre-release and may not be stable for production use.

FactBlock: an open format for claims and their history

test PyPI License: Apache-2.0

Build agent memory that tracks claims, evidence and changes, and lets you query what was known at any point in time.

Represent temporal causal knowledge graphs in portable files, reusable across AI agents, analytics, and visualizations.

FactBlock in 40 seconds: reads as of a date, a causal chain, a claim replaced not overwritten, a verdict that arrives later, and the hindsight leak without a clock. Real data from samples/cramer and samples/rates.

"The Team plan includes 10 seats." "We ship SSO in Q3." Who said it, when, on what basis, and did it change? FactBlock keeps that for you, so you do not build it yourself.

pip install --pre factblock
factblock sample --policies irs/                                 # the IRS business mileage rate, 2022 to 2026, as CSV
factblock import irs/mileage.csv --backfill -o brain/
factblock import irs/mileage-2026-07.csv --backfill -o brain/    # 76 cents from July 1, announced July 13
factblock recall brain/ "mileage rate" --as-of 2026-07-20 --valid-at 2026-07-05 --limit 1

In force from one day, announced on another

A trip on July 5, 2026. The IRS raised the rate to 76 cents from July 1, but announced it on July 13. A claim filed on July 10 gets 72.5 cents; the same claim re-checked on July 20 gets 76. The day of the trip and the day you ask are two clocks, and a date filter has one:

factblock.context("brain/", "mileage rate", as_of="2026-07-10", valid_at="2026-07-05", limit=1)
# - 2025-12-29: The IRS business standard mileage rate is 72.5 cents per mile. (in force from 2026-01-01; source: https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/irs-sets-2026-business-standard-mileage-rate-at-725-cents-per-mile-up-25-cents)

factblock.context("brain/", "mileage rate", as_of="2026-07-20", valid_at="2026-07-05", limit=2)
# - 2026-07-13: The IRS business standard mileage rate is 76 cents per mile. (in force from 2026-07-01; source: https://www.irs.gov/irb/2026-29_irb)
# - 2025-12-29: The IRS business standard mileage rate is 72.5 cents per mile. (in force from 2026-01-01; source: https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/irs-sets-2026-business-standard-mileage-rate-at-725-cents-per-mile-up-25-cents)
#   replaced 2026-07-01 by: The IRS business standard mileage rate is 76 cents per mile. (announced 2026-07-13)

Every rate links to the IRS release it came from. The same files draw the history: factblock timeline brain/ --as-of 2026-10-10 -o mileage.html.

The IRS business mileage rate from 2022 to 2026, each rate replaced by the next

examples/support-agent asks five support questions of a made-up company on the day they were asked (a price announced before it takes effect, a policy memo that arrived late, a promise and whether it was kept): a date filter puts a stale answer in the prompt on all five, FactBlock on none.

Judged later, counted honestly

$ factblock track-record samples/cramer --as-of 2026-10-01
      judged    right    wrong    mixed     open  overdue      hit
all      779      426      353        0      629       46      55%
on record before it was resolved: 0 of 779; 779 written later from a cited source (checkable)
baseline (779 calls with a return): saying up every time would hit 54%; following the calls made +5.2% a call, +1.4% over SPY

Two years of a TV commentator's market calls: right about as often as saying "up" every time, yet +1.4% a call over the market (examples/analysis).

How it reads

factblock sample rates/                                # a bundle: six dated claims, a reversal, three verdicts
factblock track-record rates/ --as-of 2025-01-01      # how claims, predictions and promises turned out
factblock scan rates/ --as-of 2024-05-01              # what was known that day, and what was hidden
factblock why rates/ c3 --as-of 2024-10-01            # the causal chain behind a block
factblock resolve rates/ belief:fed:direction --as-of 2024-10-01
factblock import kb.csv --backfill -o brain/          # rows you already have: id, text, said_at, effective_from, known_at, replaces
factblock import crm.csv --backfill -o brain/ --map Claim=text,Date=said_at   # your own column names
factblock extract transcript.txt --observed-at 2024-03-20 --speaker "Jim Cramer" --backfill -o brain/   # prose, through your model key
$ factblock why rates/ c3 --as-of 2024-10-01
subject: c3  2024-06-20  Housing demand falls as mortgages track yields
    cause (CAUSES): c2  2024-04-10  Bond yields rise after the rate hike
        cause (CAUSES): c1  2024-03-20  The Fed raises interest rates
            successor (SUPERSEDES): c4  2024-09-18  The Fed cuts interest rates
as of 2024-10-01  hidden: nothing  backfilled: 4 rows in 3 batches

Run the same command --as-of 2024-05-01 and the chain stops at c2, because c3 was not known yet. Add --json to any read for the machine form.

import factblock
print(factblock.context("rates/", "interest rates", as_of="2024-10-01"))
# - 2024-09-18: The Fed cuts interest rates
# - 2024-03-20: The Fed raises interest rates (learned 2024-04-15)
#   replaced 2024-09-18 by: The Fed cuts interest rates
#   verdict: true (decided 2024-05-01 by process:tckg-resolver)
# - 2024-04-10: Bond yields rise after the rate hike (learned 2024-04-15)
# (as of 2024-10-01)

That string goes into your agent's prompt. The old claim is still there, marked as replaced, with the verdict it had as of that day; ask as_of="2025-01-01" and the verdict reads false, because it was re-resolved in December. A date filter would show both claims side by side with nothing to say which one stands. factblock.recall(...) returns the same blocks as dicts with a certificate, and factblock.scan(...) returns everything visible as pyarrow tables.

A bundle is a folder of plain files. Commit it to git, query it with DuckDB, hand it to another agent, or sync it with a hosted ledger. Nothing here needs a server.

What comes out

Two years of one public figure's statements, as files. samples/cramer is Jim Cramer on CNBC, 2024-09 to 2026-09: 2,091 blocks, 1,169 links he drew between them, 779 priced calls scored at their horizon. Every block links to the recording and the timestamp.

Following only his best subjects looks like +9.3% a call. Picked with what was known at the time, it makes +4.9%.

$ factblock scan samples/cramer --as-of 2025-01-01 | head -1
as of 2025-01-01  hidden: 1775 nodes, 1025 edges, 753 resolutions  not in force: 15 nodes  backfilled: 471 rows in 52 batches

$ factblock why samples/cramer 1b77a1a885470207 --as-of 2026-09-10
subject: 1b77a1a885470207  2025-07-17  The current data center buildout is the largest construction boom since World War II.
    effect (CAUSES): c43aac6a842836bf  2025-07-17  Lead contractors such as ABB and Legrand are receiving strong data center orders.
        effect (CAUSES): 041ef1dfd5dbb6df  2025-07-17  Companies involved in the data center buildout, such as Eaton and Parker-Hannifin, are receiving a large number of new orders.
            effect (CAUSES): 2751ba237ecd5415  2025-07-17  Parker-Hannifin is a good stock to own.
            effect (CAUSES): 7d3af08ba4f4f027  2025-07-17  Eaton is a good stock to own.

A call and its verdict carry separate clocks, so the same read gives different answers on different days:

66027d5985bf9605  prediction  2024-09-11  Nvidia's business is currently growing, not slowing down.   NVDA, up
  verdict: came_true   decided 2024-12-10   NVDA +23.3% over 90 days   known 2024-12-10

As of 2024-11-01 the call is open. As of 2024-12-10 it came true. As of 2024-09-10 it does not exist yet. to-claimreview samples/cramer --as-of 2025-06-01 writes the 197 verdicts known by then as schema.org JSON-LD.

Every block carries two clocks: asserted_at, when it was said (--observed-at for extract), and known_at, when your system learned it. By default that is now, so a 2024 transcript extracted today is hidden from a 2024 read; --backfill declares it known when it was said, which is what you want for material from the past. --provider fake splits sentences without a model, enough to see the files; gemini and openai do the real extraction with your key. Every edge carries a type with a family (causal, argumentative, temporal) and the speaker's own confidence. Nothing is a chunk, nothing is a bare triple; the unit is a dated statement someone made.

When

Memory that cannot answer "what did I know on that date" leaks the future into every evaluation and every backtest. FactBlock reads are always as of an instant:

import factblock
r = factblock.scan("rates/", as_of="2024-05-01")
r.nodes                 # pyarrow.Table: only blocks known by 2024-05-01
r.certificate           # {'as_of': ..., 'masked': {'node': 4, 'edge': 2}, 'backfill': {'batches': 1, 'rows': 3}}

The certificate says how many rows were hidden because they were learned later, and which rows were backfilled from the past under a declared batch. An answer with masking is a correct answer for that instant, and it says so.

A statement that gets corrected or reversed is not overwritten. The new block points at the old one with SUPERSEDES, both keep their intervals, and a read as of a date in between still sees the old one. That is how "when did they change their mind" stays answerable.

Why

Edges are the speaker's reasoning, not co-occurrence: CAUSES, CONTRIBUTING_FACTOR, TRIGGERS, PREVENTS, SUPPORTS, CONTRADICTS, CONCURRENT_SIGNAL, SUPERSEDES. why walks them from a block to the given depth, as of an instant, and names the role at every hop (cause, effect, successor, contradiction), so the chain never includes a reason that was not yet known.

Declared facts make conflicts explicit. Declare belief:fed:direction with a policy (latest_valid, latest_observed, source_priority, strict) and resolve returns one value or the reason there is none: no_data, not_yet, no_value_at, unresolved_conflict. It never guesses.

Timelines

Once your data is a bundle, one call draws what happened to each statement over time, as known on a day you pick.

t = factblock.timeline("examples/promises/brain", as_of="2026-05-10", group_by="customer")
t                                                  # in Jupyter, the chart; hover for the history and block id, click for the source
t.save("promises.html")                            # .html needs nothing; .png and .svg need factblock[viz]

Three sales promises grouped by customer: one kept, one broken, one open, as known on 10 May 2026

One bar per statement, from the day it was said to the day it was replaced, judged or due, coloured by what became of it. The rest of its story (took effect, learned late, replaced by what, every verdict with its date) is in the tooltip and in t.claims and t.events. Read as of an earlier day and the verdicts, replacements and statements learned after it are not drawn.

Add a numeric series (prices, rates, any CSV with a date and a value) and the same statements sit on it where they were said:

t = factblock.timeline("samples/cramer", as_of="2025-06-30", query="SPY").with_series("sp500.csv", "S&P 500")

His calls on the market over the S&P 500 as known on 30 June 2025; the four settled calls are labelled, one right and three wrong

Values after the as-of day are dropped too. On the command line: factblock timeline samples/cramer --as-of 2025-06-30 -q SPY --series sp500.csv -o spy.html. The chart is a Vega-Lite spec (t.spec()), so it renders the same in a notebook, a web page (react-vega, vega-embed), or as an image in a chat answer. t.to_html(inline=True) is one self-contained page that renders with no network; t.to_markdown() is the same timeline as text for clients that cannot draw; t.to_dict() is the data for any other renderer, versioned as schemas/timeline.v1.schema.json. samples/fed-funds-rate.csv (FRED DFF, public domain) goes with samples/rates; the S&P 500 is licensed, so download it from FRED (SP500) yourself.

In a chat answer. An MCP server returns t.to_mcp() from its tool and serves factblock.mcp_app_html() as the resource ui://factblock/timeline (mime type and _meta in factblock.timeline.MCP_APP_MIME and MCP_APP_META; the tool's _meta is MCP_APP_TOOL_META). Hosts that support MCP Apps (Claude, ChatGPT, VS Code) then draw the chart inside the answer, in the host's theme; the rest show the markdown. The tckg timeline tool does exactly this. The same question asked as of two days:

As of 30 April 2025: 11 statements, the last call still open As of 30 June 2025: 16 statements, that call judged wrong on 6 June

On 30 April the last call ("bigger forces are going to crush the entire market") is open; on 30 June it has been judged wrong and five later calls have appeared. The April answer cannot use what was learned in May.

What one statement rests on. factblock.graph(bundle, block_id, as_of) draws the links around one statement: what it rests on above it, what came of it below, each row written in full, each dot coloured by what became of the statement. It walks why(), so a link or a verdict learned after as_of is not drawn.

g = factblock.graph("samples/cramer", "fdc79a63b9b44a7f", as_of="2025-06-30", depth=2)
g.nodes, g.edges     # {id, label, type, when, resolution} and {id, from, to, label}: a graph renderer takes them as they are

What "The stock market is positioned to move higher" rested on and led to, as known on 30 June 2025

Claims it is good at

Kind Example What you can ask
Prediction "Yields keep climbing this year" (podcast, 2024-03-20) What did this person believe on 2024-03-20? Did it come true? When did they say the opposite?
Stance CEO: "No price increase this year" (Jan), "An increase is unavoidable" (Jul) How did the company's position move? What did we know in May?
Fact that gets corrected "Q2 revenue was $4.1B", restated to $3.9B six weeks later resolve as of August gives $4.1B, as of October $3.9B, as of July no_data
Commitment Sales: "We ship SSO by end of Q3" (to customer A) Which promises to A are past due and unresolved? Recall them before the support agent answers (examples/promises)
Your AI's own assertions Assistant: "Your plan includes 10 seats" (to user B) Which of last month's assertions are now false? Where did each one come from?

The common thread: a claim has a speaker, a time, a reason, and a later verdict. FactBlock keeps all four in one structure, and agents, SQL and charts read the same files.

Use it with your AI

Recall as context. recall ranks the visible blocks about a query and context turns them into prompt lines. Matching is by keyword over the statement and the payload's text (speaker, quote, imported columns): a shared four-letter stem counts, so cost finds "costs" but price does not; an empty query lists everything, newest first. verdict="did_not" (or "broken" for a commitment, "open", "resolved", "overdue") narrows to settled, unsettled or past-due blocks, kinds= to kinds of your own such as commitment. A change that was announced but is not in force yet is shown as changes <date> to: ..., so the agent can say "$30, rising to $36 on 15 March". Read with as_of set to the decision time (now, or a past instant for a backtest). scan returns everything visible as Arrow tables when you want to build your own.

Analytics. to-parquet writes the Parquet profile. DuckDB reads it with no Python through duckdb/factblock.sql: factblock_nodes(bundle, as_of), factblock_edges, factblock_certificate. Spark and Databricks read the same files.

From an existing graph. factblock/adapters/graphiti.py turns a Graphiti graph into a bundle; the store's own timestamps become declared backfill batches, because a store that stamped time itself is a witness.

Speak the standards. to-claimreview writes the verdicts visible as of an instant as schema.org ClaimReview JSON-LD; to-okf writes the blocks as an Open Knowledge Format bundle (markdown with frontmatter) that catalogs and agents read; from-factcheck brings published fact-checks in (Google's Fact Check Tools API shape) as dated claims with dated verdicts, every row under a batch declared at its review date. None of them is the storage format; they are doors.

Check your evals. leak takes a question set with dates ({asked_at, evidence: [block ids]} per line) and reports how many answers depend on blocks learned after the question's date, naming each block and when it became known. A date-only asked_at means the start of that day, so news ingested later that day counts as a leak; give a timestamp to be exact. It exits non-zero on a leak, so it fits in CI. On StreamingQA (1,000 sampled questions about dated news, keyword recall, top 5), a recall that ignores time cites a block learned after the question for 79.7% of questions; the same recall as of the question date cites none, by construction, and says how much it hid. This measures leakage, not answer accuracy: how much right evidence the as-of recall keeps is not measured yet. If your memory benchmark never reports this number, it is measuring hindsight.

Backtests with ingest lag. When each item has a publication time and the time your system ingested it, publication is said_at and ingestion is known_at. Do not pass --backfill: it would date every item to its publication and erase exactly the lag you are testing.

# news.jsonl: {"id": "n2", "text": "Acme cuts Q1 guidance to $1.0B.", "said_at": "2025-03-20T21:00:00Z", "known_at": "2025-03-21T02:00:00Z", "replaces": "n1"}
factblock import news.jsonl -o news/
factblock leak news/ questions.jsonl      # {"id": "q2", "asked_at": "2025-03-21T00:00:00Z", "evidence": ["n2"]} per line; --evidence-key for another name

A date-only as_of means the end of that day for reads and the start of that day for leak, so build each question's context with its full timestamp and give leak the same one. leak checks knowledge time and validity. Evidence that was knowable but already replaced when the question was asked is not a leak; recall marks it superseded_by if you need to catch that too.

For coding agents

The whole API in one block. It runs as is; tests/test_readme_agents.py keeps it that way.

pip install --pre factblock
factblock sample brain/          # or: factblock extract notes.txt --observed-at 2024-03-20 -o brain/ --provider gemini
import factblock
print(factblock.context("brain/", "interest rates", as_of="2024-10-01"))   # prompt lines, as known that day
r = factblock.recall("brain/", "interest rates", as_of="2024-10-01")       # same, as dicts
c1 = next(i for i in r["items"] if i["id"] == "c1")
print(c1["superseded_by"]["statement"], c1["verdict"]["outcome"])          # what replaced it, how it was settled

Words are matched as written. To match by meaning too, pass embed=factblock.embedder("gemini") (or "openai", or your own function) to recall, context or timeline, or --embed gemini on the command line: "price" then finds a block that says "costs". The vectors are an index cached in brain/.factblock-cache/, not part of the bundle.

Three rules: every read takes as_of (no default); a change is a new block plus SUPERSEDES, never an edit; known_at is when you learned a row: give it honestly (default now; --backfill means when it was said) and let import, extract or write_bundle declare the batch that attests it. Never claim a ledger stamp you did not get. Claude Code users can copy .claude/skills/factblock into their project; other agents read llms.txt.

If you know In FactBlock
Mem0 m.add(messages, user_id=...) factblock import for rows, factblock extract for prose; in Python from_records(rows) or extract(text, observed_at=...), then write_bundle(..., append=True); the user is a space
Mem0 m.search(query, user_id=...) recall(bundle, query, as_of=...) or context(...) for the prompt
Graphiti edge valid_at / invalid_at valid_from / valid_to on the block, plus known_at: when you learned it
Graphiti expired_at (an edge closed later) the old block stays; a new block SUPERSEDES it, known from that moment
A vector store with a date filter recall(as_of=..., embed=...) matches by meaning too, and also hides what was learned later, keeps what was replaced (marked), and attaches verdicts. Vectors are an index cached beside the bundle (.factblock-cache/), not part of it

Write rows you already have

Most memory starts as rows, not prose: a pricing table, a policy log, a CRM export. import takes them as they are, no model, and every date comes from your columns.

id,said_at,effective_from,known_at,text,replaces
p1,2026-01-10,,,The Team plan costs $30 per user per month.,
p2,2026-02-20,2026-03-15,,The Team plan costs $36 per user per month.,p1

said_at (or asserted_at) is when it was said, effective_from (or valid_from, default said_at) when it takes effect, known_at when you learned it, replaces the id it supersedes. A row with target, outcome and decided_at is a verdict. Any other column goes into the payload. In Python, any dicts with the format's own names will do:

factblock.write_bundle({"nodes": [{"id": "r1", "kind": "claim", "statement": "Annual plans refund within 30 days.",
                                   "asserted_at": "2026-01-10", "known_at": "2026-01-10"}]}, "brain/", append=True)

write_bundle fills the manifest, declares one batch per known_at, and validates the whole folder before it writes; a bundle that would fail validate raises and is not written.

Words for verdicts

You may say In the files Read with
verdict, resolution a row in resolutions.jsonl: target_id, outcome, decided_at, known_at recall (item["verdict"]), scan(...).resolutions, to-claimreview
outcome the verdict's value: true, false, came_true, did_not, ... (SPEC 3.6)
resolve not about verdicts: one value for a declared fact (fact_key) by its policy factblock resolve

Same files, hosted

A folder is one writer's memory. factagora.ai is where a brain/ meets other people's. Upload it and it comes back with more rows, never changed rows: verdicts on predictions whose horizon has passed (mechanical ones from prices and published figures, judgment calls from the community, each with evidence), links to what other people claimed about the same thing (SUPPORTS, CONTRADICTS), entities resolved across worldviews. Every added row carries its own known_at, stamped by the server rather than by you, so a verdict is as replayable as the claim it judges: as of last June, the prediction was still open.

It also gives what a folder cannot: one ledger shared by many agents and users, natural-language writes at scale, and an MCP address per worldview, so a user plugs one into Claude or Cursor and reaches nothing else. Browse public worldviews there, or ask one a question as of a date. GET /v1/export hands the folder back at any instant. The format is the contract; you can leave with your files.

factblock sync brain/ <url> --space <space> moves rows both ways by identity: what only the folder has goes up, what only the ledger has comes down, nothing is changed in place. A row's known_at travels as the batch that attests it, so the ledger learns a 2024 transcript as known in 2024, not today, and the folder learns a verdict at the instant the ledger stamped it. Run it again and it is a no-op. --pull-only into a folder that does not exist yet clones a space. The token is $TCKG_TOKEN or --token.

Bring your own store. sync talks to a store through two methods, pull(as_of) and push(manifest, nodes, edges) (factblock/sync.py, the Store protocol). TckgStore is the one for tckg over HTTP; tests/test_sync.py has a forty-line in-memory one that shows the single rule a store has to keep: declare the bundle's batches as your own backfill batches, never adopt an imported row as learned now. A SQLite, Neo4j, or warehouse store is the same two methods.

The same ledger runs closed for companies at app.factagora.com: your support logs, your sales promises, your own assistant's assertions, as claims with verdicts, inside your tenant.

The format

SPEC.md is short. Six invariants (present, attested, unique, typed, declared, verdicts on statements that were made), a JSONL profile and a Parquet profile, read semantics, and the conformance checks validate runs (thirteen of them). Projections to OKF and ClaimReview are described, and to-claimreview writes the verdicts visible as of an instant as schema.org JSON-LD, so a bundle can feed systems that speak those.

Format, not platform. Apache-2.0. tckg is one writer of this format; nothing here requires it. Contributions are welcome under the DCO: see CONTRIBUTING.md.

Status

1.0-draft.1. Works today: import (CSV or JSONL rows, no model), extract (providers gemini, openai, and fake for offline runs; the claims profile is three files under factblock/profiles/claims that any language can run), validate, scan, recall, why, leak, resolve, track-record, timeline, graph, to-parquet, sync with a tckg ledger or a store of your own, to-claimreview, to-okf, from-factcheck, the DuckDB macros, the Graphiti adapter, and the tckg export. Extraction quality on real transcripts is being measured separately; the rules are the ones a dated-claims pipeline has run on hundreds of videos. On PyPI as 1.0.0a11 (pip install --pre factblock). The format reaches 1.0.0 when a reader or writer maintained outside this repository exists; until then minor versions may change fields and the manifest's factblock_version says which one a bundle speaks.

uv sync --extra gemini                                 # or --extra openai; the fake provider needs nothing
export GEMINI_API_KEY=...                              # or GOOGLE_GENAI_USE_VERTEXAI=1 GOOGLE_CLOUD_PROJECT=... for Vertex
echo "The Fed will keep raising rates this year. That means bond yields keep climbing." \
  | uv run python -m factblock extract - --observed-at 2024-03-20 --speaker "Jim Cramer" --backfill -o brain/
uv run python -m factblock scan brain/ --as-of 2024-05-01
uv sync
uv run python -m factblock validate samples/rates
uv run python -m factblock scan samples/rates --as-of 2024-08-01
uv run python -m factblock why samples/rates c3 --as-of 2024-10-01 --json
uv run python -m factblock leak samples/rates samples/rates-questions.jsonl
uv run python -m factblock resolve samples/rates belief:fed:direction --as-of 2024-10-01
uv run python tests/test_rates.py && uv run python tests/test_why.py && uv run python tests/test_recall.py && uv run python tests/test_leak.py && uv run python tests/test_sync.py && uv run python tests/test_claimreview.py && uv run python tests/test_okf.py && uv run python tests/test_factcheck.py && uv run python tests/test_graphiti_adapter.py && uv run python tests/test_duckdb.py

Metadata

Release files for factblock 1.0.0a14

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for factblock 1.0.0a14
File Size Uploaded Provenance
factblock-1.0.0a14.tar.gz 6.0 MB With provenance Details

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for factblock 1.0.0a14
File Interpreter ABI Platform
factblock-1.0.0a14-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details

Total release size: 6.1 MB

Release files / factblock-1.0.0a14.tar.gz

Download URL factblock-1.0.0a14.tar.gz
Size 6.0 MB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
ee94aa46ae2a48fe78c211bd4b5bbd8256de7100686dfc622138904748e0c6c1
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
30b05ffba3bcd4b64cd119c978780da26b21995b1b5f76e9553ecf55d56d9900
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 10, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / factblock-1.0.0a14-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL factblock-1.0.0a14-py3-none-any.whl
Size 98.3 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
c883108e430c66b08a371cedd85db55e9a549106b7fe45efa57d0c3e89599d2b
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
91bc338e8d2f69629cdc32c6702f127ebc0cde94f79a8580ce2cada4f8ab925b
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 10, 2026.

Transparency log

Security for factblock 1.0.0a14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

Full provenance

All 2 files in this release have been uploaded with provenance metadata.

Select from 2 files

Attestation for factblock-1.0.0a14.tar.gz

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 10, 2026.

Transparency log

A note on package security

PyPI is a repository for distributing packages, not a service for auditing them. While third-party security researchers and our staff do their best to detect and remove malicious packages, PyPI cannot guarantee the quality, security or suitability of any given package.

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page