Skip to main content

fusedtok

CI PyPI License: MIT Python 3.10+

Fused CUDA kernels for LLM inference — RMSNorm / RoPE / SwiGLU / attention decode and friends, with zero-copy torch tensor support: up to 8.9x faster than PyTorch SDPA (attention decode, RTX 3060, see Benchmarks).

中文文档请看 README_zh.md | English below.

Why

LLM inference frameworks launch many small, memory-bound operators per token. Each launch round-trips through global memory. fusedtok fuses them into single kernels to cut memory traffic and launch overhead.

Operators

34 operators + helpers (the frozen fusedtok.__all__ of the 1.x series; see "API stability" below). axpy is the hello-world demo op kept from the v0.x skeleton - functional, but not a performance feature.

Status Kernel Notes
✅ RMSNorm (+residual) LLaMA/Qwen style, fused residual add
✅ LayerNorm with affine
✅ RoPE interleaved and NeoX layouts, kv-cache pos_offset
✅ SwiGLU fused MLP activation
✅ Softmax (row-wise) numerically stable
✅ SiLU / GeLU / GeLU-tanh / ReLU / Tanh / Sigmoid elementwise
✅ add / mul elementwise binary (fused add+residual pattern)
✅ top-k / top-p (nucleus) arrival-ticket radix + early-exit compaction, replayed from a cached CUDA graph; deterministic ties (1.57x / 1.51x vs torch/CUB @131k k=50, parity-to-winning across the whole k range on both test GPUs)
✅ argmax / temperature greedy decoding helpers
✅ sample_topp fused nucleus sampling: softmax -> top-p -> seeded draw, global-mass threshold
✅ sample_topk fused top-k sampling: softmax -> top-k -> renormalize within the window -> seeded draw (2.04x / 2.03x vs the topk+multinomial composite @131k)
✅ sample_minp fused min-p sampling (v1.3): keep every token with p >= min_p * p_max -> renormalize -> seeded draw - a value threshold, so no global-mass reduction; adaptive nucleus by construction
✅ repetition penalty CTRL-style, applied to sampled token ids
✅ decode_step the whole decode step fused: penalty -> temperature -> nucleus sample, one call, one readback
✅ quantize_int8 / dequantize_int8 / qadd_int8 symmetric per-tensor INT8, fused dequant-add-requant
✅ qgemm INT8 matmul, int32-exact: cp.async double-buffered pipelined IMMA GEMM with runtime tile tuning (64x64 / 128x128) + warp-per-row GEMV (M=1 decode; 2x vs fp16 projection)
✅ qgemm_perchannel the W8A8 layout real INT8 inference uses: per-output-channel weight scales fused into the same kernel's epilogue at zero cost
✅ attention_decode single-token causal attention with GQA over a contiguous kv-cache: online softmax, flash-decoding split over long caches, per-sequence lengths; float32 / bfloat16 / float16 storage (half-precision cache = half the decode bytes, softmax stays float32)
✅ kv_append the cache-write side of the contiguous decode loop (v1.3): one fresh token's k/v rows per sequence scattered in place into the cache at row lens[b] (one tiny kernel, f32/bf16/fp16)
✅ attention_decode_paged the v1.2 headline: the same decode attention over a vLLM-style block-pool kv-cache [Nb, Hkv, P, D] walked through a per-sequence block table - fragmentation-free cache memory; any valid table honored, f32/bf16/fp16 storage, 1.09-1.13x the contiguous op (7.96x / 4.28x vs SDPA on the pre-expanded-heads reference)
✅ kv_append_paged the cache-write side of the paged loop: one fresh token's k/v rows per sequence scattered in place into the pool at position lens[b] (one tiny kernel, f32/bf16/fp16)
✅ attention_prefill fresh-sequence attention over S query rows (causal / bidirectional), float32 / bf16 / fp16 storage; convenience path - heavyweight prefill stays SDPA/flash territory (honest ~0.45x f32)
✅ axpy a*x + b - the v0.x hello-world demo op, kept for API compatibility

Install

pip install fusedtok

Prebuilt wheels on PyPI (built with CUDA 12.4): Linux x86_64 (manylinux, cp310-cp313) and Windows x86_64 (cp311-cp313). On other platforms or Python versions pip builds from source automatically:

git clone https://github.com/Hai-Wenxiang/fusedtok.git
cd fusedtok
pip install .

Requirements:

  • NVIDIA GPU of RTX 30 series (Ampere) or newer — e.g. RTX 3060/3090, RTX 4080, RTX 5090, A100, H100
  • CUDA Toolkit >= 12.0
  • A C++17 compiler (MSVC on Windows, GCC/Clang on Linux); Python 3.10+
What is "compute capability"? (click to expand)

Compute capability is NVIDIA's version number for a GPU architecture generation — not a performance score. CUDA code must be compiled for a specific architecture to run on it. The wheel builds native cubins for compute capability 8.0 (A100) and 8.6 (RTX 30) plus a compute_86 PTX fallback, so Ampere runs natively and newer architectures (RTX 40/50, ...) JIT the PTX with their driver.

Compute capability Architecture Example GPUs
7.5 Turing GTX 16xx, RTX 20xx (not supported)
8.0 / 8.6 Ampere A100, RTX 30xx
8.9 Ada RTX 40xx (via PTX)
9.0 Hopper H100 (via PTX)
12.0 Blackwell RTX 50xx (via PTX)

Check yours: run nvidia-smi to see your GPU model, then look it up at https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-gpus

Usage

numpy in / numpy out, or torch in / torch out — including zero-copy CUDA: kernels read and write torch device buffers directly via data_ptr(), with no staging copies and no host synchronization.

import numpy as np
import torch
import fusedtok

x = np.random.randn(4, 1024).astype(np.float32)
w = np.random.rand(1024).astype(np.float32)

# CPU reference implementation (ground truth, runs anywhere)
y = fusedtok.rmsnorm(x, w, eps=1e-6)

# staged CUDA: copies to GPU, runs kernel, copies back
y = fusedtok.rmsnorm(x, w, cuda=True)

# zero-copy CUDA with torch tensors: kernels run in torch's own buffers,
# stream-ordered with other torch operations
xt, wt = torch.from_numpy(x).cuda(), torch.from_numpy(w).cuda()
yt = fusedtok.rmsnorm(xt, wt)          # -> CUDA torch tensor

# RoPE with kv-cache position offset, NeoX (LLaMA-HF) layout
q = torch.randn(1, 4096, device="cuda")          # new token only
q_rot, k_rot = fusedtok.rope(q, k=None, pos_offset=1023, neox=True)

# attention over a GQA kv-cache: one call per decode step, no score
# materialization, variable-length batches share one cache tensor
out = fusedtok.attention_decode(
    q_heads,                                    # [B, Hq, D] new token
    k_cache, v_cache,                           # [B, Hkv, T, D]
    lens=torch.tensor([1023, 512], dtype=torch.int32, device="cuda"))
# grow a contiguous cache: append each new token's rows, then decode
fusedtok.kv_append(k_cache, v_cache, k_new, v_new, lens)
out = fusedtok.attention_decode(q_heads, k_cache, v_cache, lens + 1)
# ...or over a paged (vLLM-style block-pool) cache: pools [Nb, Hkv, P, D]
# + a per-sequence block table; append each new token, then decode
fusedtok.kv_append_paged(k_pool, v_pool, block_table, k_new, v_new, lens)
out = fusedtok.attention_decode_paged(q_heads, k_pool, v_pool,
                                      block_table, lens + 1)
# fresh-sequence prefill (causal by default; convenience path)
ctx = fusedtok.attention_prefill(q_all, k_all, v_all, causal=True)

# sampling side: the whole decode step in one fused call
token = fusedtok.decode_step(logits, sampled_ids, penalty=1.1,
                             p=0.9, temperature=0.8, seed=step)
# or step by step:
logits = fusedtok.repetition_penalty(logits, sampled_ids, penalty=1.1)
token = fusedtok.sample_topp(logits, p=0.9, temperature=0.8, seed=step)
# top-k sampling variant (renormalizes within the k survivors)
token = fusedtok.sample_topk(logits, k=50, temperature=0.8, seed=step)

A minimal per-token sampling loop:

import torch, fusedtok as ft

h = torch.zeros(1, 4096, device="cuda")            # decoder state
w = torch.load("rms_weight.pt").cuda()             # float32 weights
wq, wscale = ft.quantize_int8(weight_f32.ravel())  # int8 weights
generated = []
for step in range(256):
    h = ft.rmsnorm(h, w, residual=h)               # fused add + norm
    q = ft.rope(q, k=None, pos_offset=step, neox=True)
    logits = model_output(h)                       # your model
    tok = ft.decode_step(logits, generated, penalty=1.1,
                         p=0.9, temperature=0.8, seed=step)
    generated.append(int(tok))

Every function accepts float32 numpy arrays or torch tensors (other dtypes are converted with a copy) and returns float32 outputs of the same family. CUDA torch tensors may be bfloat16 on every operator that moves tensor data (elementwise / norms / RoPE / attention), and the attention operators additionally take float16 — kernels compute in float32 and convert at the load/store boundary (norm weights are upcast to float32 automatically; sampling/selection ops stay float32). CUDA torch tensors select the zero-copy path automatically.

See examples/demo.py for a runnable tour of every operator, and the usage guide for the topic-structured manual - one page per theme: quickstart, the execution model (paths / dtypes / streams / CUDA graphs), attention, the sampling contract, the INT8 workflow, how to read the benchmarks, and an FAQ with a glossary. Also available in 中文.

Correctness

Every kernel ships with a CPU reference implementation and element-wise parity tests (pytest). Tests run on machines without a GPU (CUDA cases skip automatically).

API stability

1.0 freezes the public surface: the names in fusedtok.__all__ (34 operators + helpers) keep their signatures across the 1.x series. Type stubs (__init__.pyi, PEP 561 py.typed) ship with the package. New operators arrive in minor releases; breaking changes require a new major version and a deprecation window. Determinism promises: selection ties resolve to the earliest index; sampling is deterministic per seed.

Benchmarks

RTX 3060 (sm_86), float32, zero-copy torch tensors, CUDA-event timing over 3 independent rounds (means below; per-round values in the JSON), vs the equivalent PyTorch reference (composite eager expressions; attention references use pre-expanded heads - repeat_interleave outside the timed region). Largest shape per op; full data: docs/benchmarks/benchmark_rtx3060.json, reproduce with python benchmarks/bench.py:

Op Shape fusedtok PyTorch reference Speedup
attention_decode (GQA) T=16384, D=128 873 µs 7783 µs (SDPA) 8.91x
attention_decode_paged (GQA) T=16384, D=128, P=16 984 µs 7830 µs (SDPA) 7.96x
RoPE NeoX (q+k) [8192×4096] 1662 µs 10196 µs 6.13x
kv_append (contiguous cache write) B=8, T=4096 17 µs 89 µs (advanced indexing) 5.31x
RMSNorm (+residual) [4096×4096] 627 µs 2087 µs 3.33x
sample_topp p=0.9 (peaked) [131072] 162 µs 511 µs (sort+mask+multinomial) 3.16x
attention_decode bf16 T=16384, D=128 872 µs 1828 µs (SDPA bf16) 2.10x
sample_topk k=50 [131072] 148 µs 302 µs (topk+multinomial) 2.04x
SwiGLU [4096×4096] 620 µs 1036 µs 1.67x
top-k (k=50) [131072] 82 µs 129 µs 1.57x
LayerNorm [4096×4096] 452 µs 624 µs 1.38x
sample_minp p=0.05 (peaked) [131072] 170 µs 211 µs (mask+multinomial) 1.24x
top-k (k=4096, mid-k) [131072] 119 µs 139 µs 1.17x
Softmax [4096×4096] 419 µs 436 µs 1.04x
SiLU / GeLU / add [4096×4096] ~416-616 µs ~417-620 µs ~1.0x
argmax [131072] 53 µs 42 µs 0.80x (event-timed, noisy on WDDM; wall probe 1.12x - see below)
int8 qgemm pc (W8A8) [4096×4096×4096] 3591 µs (38.3 TOPS) 2066 µs (cuBLASLt + broadcast) 0.58x (honest)
int8 qgemm (IMMA) [4096×11008×4096] 9765 µs (37.8 TOPS) 4477 µs (cuBLASLt) 0.46x (honest)
attention_prefill (causal) S=1024, D=128 5931 µs 2645 µs (SDPA flash) 0.45x (honest)
sample_topp p=0.9 (flat worst case) [131072] 1447 µs 536 µs 0.37x (honest, see below)
sample_minp p=0.05 (wide nucleus) [131072] 679 µs 217 µs 0.32x (honest: two ladder retries + a 64k sort; the torch boolean-mask composite never sorts - see the peaked min-p row above for min-p's win scenario)

Row-wise kernels (norms, softmax) autotune their thread-block size per shape at first call (v0.4.1); the table reflects the tuned choices.

fusedtok vs PyTorch reference

RTX 5060 Ti (Blackwell, sm_120) — same suite, largest shape per op (full data: docs/benchmarks/benchmark_rtx5060ti.json):

Op Shape fusedtok PyTorch reference Speedup
RoPE NeoX (q+k) [8192×4096] 1385 µs 8372 µs 6.05x
attention_decode (GQA) T=16384, D=128 574 µs 2681 µs (SDPA) 4.67x
attention_decode_paged (GQA) T=16384, D=128, P=16 626 µs 2681 µs (SDPA) 4.28x
attention_decode bf16 T=16384, D=128 548 µs 640 µs (SDPA bf16) 1.17x
RMSNorm (+residual) [4096×4096] 505 µs 1658 µs 3.29x
sample_topp p=0.9 (peaked) [131072] 62 µs 154 µs (sort+mask+multinomial) 2.47x
sample_topk k=50 [131072] 45 µs 92 µs (topk+multinomial) 2.03x
SwiGLU [4096×4096] 504 µs 859 µs 1.70x
top-k (k=50) [131072] 27 µs 41 µs (CUB) 1.51x
sample_minp p=0.05 (peaked) [131072] 62 µs 72 µs (mask+multinomial) 1.17x
top-k (k=4096, mid-k) [131072] 50 µs 54 µs (CUB) 1.09x
LayerNorm / Softmax [4096×4096] ~346 µs ~345-351 µs ~1.0x
argmax [131072] 17 µs 14 µs 0.80x (event-timed, noisy; wall probe 0.96x)
int8 qgemm pc (W8A8) [4096×4096×4096] 2078 µs (66.1 TOPS) 1142 µs (cuBLASLt + broadcast) 0.55x (honest)
attention_prefill (causal) S=1024, D=128 3300 µs 1421 µs (SDPA flash) 0.43x (honest)
int8 qgemm (IMMA) [4096×11008×4096] 5481 µs (67.4 TOPS) 2186 µs (cuBLASLt) 0.40x (honest)
kv_append (contiguous cache write) B=8, T=4096 9 µs 21 µs (advanced indexing) 2.21x
sample_topp p=0.9 (flat worst case) [131072] 984 µs 164 µs 0.17x (honest, see below)
sample_minp p=0.05 (wide nucleus) [131072] 366 µs 72 µs 0.20x (honest: same wide-nucleus caveat as the 3060 row)

On smaller shapes the Blackwell card shows bigger wins (softmax 1.7x, RMSNorm 3.1x at 256 rows, attention decode 3.81x at T=4096 running 188 GB/s) - the launch-overhead share shrinks as shapes grow; full sweep in the JSON.

fusedtok vs PyTorch reference (RTX 5060 Ti)

The PyPI wheel ships sm_80/sm_86 cubins plus a compute_86 PTX fallback — verified to JIT and run correctly on Blackwell (sm_120) drivers.

Fusions win big (RoPE / RMSNorm / SwiGLU) because eager mode round-trips intermediate tensors through global memory. The v0.4 selection pipeline (arrival-ticket radix rounds + early-exit compaction, replayed from a cached CUDA graph) beats torch's CUB radix select at small k on both GPUs; the v1.0 retune (in-block-sort threshold and sort chunk both dropped 2048 -> 1024 - a single block bitonic-sorting 2048 keys was the whole mid-k regression) brings the mid-k window to parity-or-winning as well (k=4096 @131k: 1.17x / 1.09x). The fused samplers win against the eager composites when the logits look like real decode output (sample_topp peaked: 3.16x / 2.47x; sample_topk: 2.04x / 2.03x; the peaked row's composite reference itself swings ~15% run-to-run on WDDM - per-round values in the JSON); on a FLAT distribution sample_topp is honestly 0.17-0.37x — the nucleus then spans ~90% of the vocabulary and the pipeline must effectively order the whole thing. v1.2 cut that worst case ~8.5x (18.2ms -> 2.2ms at n=131072 on a 3060) with three token-preserving changes - an adaptive window jump driven by a p*total mass bound, a full-vocabulary fast path that skips the selection stages, and a batched-load serial sampling walk (the strictly sequential float adds are the CPU-parity determinism contract; only the loads got pipelined); v1.3 cut it another ~1.6x (2.2ms -> 1.4ms on a 3060, 1.6ms -> 1.0ms on a 5060 Ti) by having the first walk record prefix-sum checkpoints that the inverse-CDF walk binary-searches - still bit-identical tokens - but torch's fully parallel sort still owns that regime. sample_minp (v1.3) wins on peaked logits (1.24x / 1.17x vs the softmax+mask+multinomial composite) and honestly loses the wide-nucleus row (0.2-0.32x: two widening retries plus a 64k sort; the torch boolean-mask composite never sorts). attention_decode wins big at decode (one launch streams the GQA cache once at up to ~154 GB/s effective on a 3060 / ~234 GB/s on a 5060 Ti, while SDPA pays head expansion or small-query inefficiency); attention_decode_paged (v1.2) pays only 1.09-1.13x for the block-table indirection of the fragmentation-free vLLM-style cache layout, with bit-identical output on matching slice schedules; attention_prefill is the honest convenience path at ~0.45x of SDPA's flash backend — no tensor cores by design, so heavyweight prefill stays with SDPA/FlashAttention. kv_append (v1.3) writes one token's k/v rows into the contiguous cache in a single launch (5.31x / 2.21x over the advanced-indexing scatter; a tiny launch-bound op - parity-level cost per decode step). The INT8 decode GEMV moves half the bytes of an fp16 projection and runs at full memory bandwidth (2x); the pipelined IMMA GEMM (v1.0 rework: cp.async double-buffered slabs, runtime-tuned 64x64 / 128x128 tiles) reaches ~38 TOPS on a 3060 and ~67 TOPS on a 5060 Ti — 2x-4x the v0.4 kernel — but cuBLASLt (torch._int_mm) still holds a ~2.1-2.5x lead on the per-tensor rows (its tiles pipeline deeper and its epilogue is tuned per-arch); the W8A8 rows' gap is only ~1.7-1.8x. For now qgemm is the exact / graph-capturable / zero-copy INT8 path, not the fastest one; honest numbers, a CUTLASS-class schedule stays future work. The per-channel variant (qgemm_perchannel, the W8A8 layout INT8 inference actually uses) fuses the per-output-channel scale multiply into the same epilogue at zero kernel cost — the composite torch reference pays for that broadcast separately, which is where its 0.55-0.58x comes from.

All sampling rows above measure FIXED logits since 1.1.1 (the bench seeds torch's RNG); since v1.2 the peaked row spikes +20 and the flat row uses near-uniform logits — both regimes are now deterministically what their labels say (the v1.1 peaked row sat on the coverage boundary at n=131072 and flipped regimes per seed). The argmax rows are event-timed over a host-synchronized call and swing on WDDM (0.73-1.24x across runs); wall-clock probes with the sync excluded from the timed loop measure 1.12x (3060) / 0.96x (5060 Ti) — v1.2 removed one CUDA submission and one allocation per call.

Development

See CONTRIBUTING.md for the full guide (test rules, error contract, determinism invariants). Quick start:

# Windows: run inside a VS developer prompt (vcvars64)
cmake -S . -B build -G Ninja -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release
cmake --build build
# from repo root: PYTHONPATH picks up the built module, conftest.py adds python/
$env:PYTHONPATH = "$PWD/build"        # Windows
PYTHONPATH=$PWD/build                 # Linux
python -m pytest tests -q
python benchmarks/bench.py            # GPU benchmark + chart

Windows / Linux. Windows uses MSVC via nvcc; CI builds and runs the CPU test suite on every push.

Roadmap

  • v0.2 (done): bf16 zero-copy, radix-select top-k/top-p, fused nucleus sampling, single-read softmax, CUDA-graph verified
  • v0.3 (done): chunk-merge selection sort + parallel nucleus count, bf16x4/x8 vectorized elementwise, INT8 quantize/dequantize utilities
  • v0.4 (done): arrival-ticket selection pipeline (no cooperative launch, early-exit compaction, cached CUDA graphs), stream-aware launchers everywhere (real CUDA-graph capture), INT8 compute path (IMMA qgemm + decode GEMV), fused decode_step sampling
  • v0.4.1 (done): runtime block-size autotuning for the row-wise kernels (norms/softmax pick 128..1024 threads per shape at first call)
  • v0.5 (done): attention - GQA decode attention over a contiguous kv-cache (flash-decoding split over long caches, per-sequence lengths) and a tiled prefill path (honest ~0.45x of SDPA flash - the convenience path); single-chart-per-GPU benchmarks; Windows wheels in the PyPI publish pipeline
  • 1.0 (released): pipelined tensor-core INT8 GEMM (cp.async double-buffering, runtime tile tuning; 17 -> 39 TOPS on a 3060) with per-channel weight scales (W8A8), fused top-k sampling (2.1x vs the topk+multinomial composite), top-k mid-range-k parity, text hygiene gate, wheel matrix expansion (Linux cp310-313, Windows cp311-313), API freeze
  • 1.1 (released): half-precision attention — attention_decode / attention_prefill accept bfloat16 and float16 caches (float32 compute, half the decode bytes); parallel exp precompute halves the flat-distribution sampling worst case with bit-identical tokens
  • 1.2 (released): paged kv-cache attention — attention_decode_paged over a vLLM-style block pool [Nb, Hkv, P, D] + per-sequence block tables (1.06-1.07x the contiguous op, any valid table honored) and kv_append_paged (the in-place cache-write side); flat-distribution sampling worst case cut ~8.5x (adaptive widening jump + full-vocab fast path + batched-load serial walk, tokens bit-identical); argmax launch diet (one submission and one allocation less per call)
  • 1.2.1 (released): audit-driven hardening - selection workspace overflow past 131072-token vocabularies fixed (Qwen-scale vocabs), host-side lens/table/id validation with a documented device-tensor trust boundary (CUDA-graph capture works with lens now), empty- input and dtype/contiguity guards on the zero-copy paths, honest benchmark bandwidth (four rows were over-billed 1.5x), warning-clean builds (MSVC /W3 + GCC -Wall -Wextra), and the documentation restructured into topic pages with a natural-sounding Chinese rewrite
  • 1.3 (released): sample_minp (min-p sampling - value-threshold nucleus relative to p_max, no global-mass reduction, adaptive by construction) and kv_append (the contiguous cache-write side); the sampling serial walk gains checkpoint bisection (walk 1 records prefix sums, walk 2 binary-searches them - flat worst case cut another ~1.6x, tokens bit-identical); zero-copy helpers reject CPU operands (a host pointer in a kernel poisons the CUDA context)
  • 1.3.1 (released): audit-driven hardening - staged-path lens/block-table value validation closed (bad values used to become silent GPU out-of-bounds writes) plus integer-input hardening; two latent sampling-walk bugs fixed (stride>=2 checkpoint double-count, adaptive widening reading the wrong workspace word - mid-tail ~28% faster with bit-identical tokens); softmax tuner capped to keep sanitizer gates clean; kernel/launcher cleanup; benchmark tables fully regenerated (new min-p peaked and kv_append rows) and a documentation overhaul (stale numbers, stiff Chinese phrasing, glossary additions)

Community

License

MIT — see LICENSE. Third-party notices: NOTICES.md.

Metadata

Release files for fusedtok 1.3.1

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for fusedtok 1.3.1
File Size Uploaded
fusedtok-1.3.1.tar.gz 621.0 kB Details

Built distributions (wheels)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for fusedtok 1.3.1
File
fusedtok-1.3.1-cp313-cp313-win_amd64.whl CPython 3.13 CPython 3.13 Windows x86-64 Details
fusedtok-1.3.1-cp313-cp313-manylinux_2_34_x86_64.whl CPython 3.13 CPython 3.13 Linux glibc 2.34+ x86-64 Details
fusedtok-1.3.1-cp312-cp312-win_amd64.whl CPython 3.12 CPython 3.12 Windows x86-64 Details
fusedtok-1.3.1-cp312-cp312-manylinux_2_34_x86_64.whl CPython 3.12 CPython 3.12 Linux glibc 2.34+ x86-64 Details
fusedtok-1.3.1-cp311-cp311-win_amd64.whl CPython 3.11 CPython 3.11 Windows x86-64 Details
fusedtok-1.3.1-cp311-cp311-manylinux_2_34_x86_64.whl CPython 3.11 CPython 3.11 Linux glibc 2.34+ x86-64 Details
fusedtok-1.3.1-cp310-cp310-manylinux_2_34_x86_64.whl CPython 3.10 CPython 3.10 Linux glibc 2.34+ x86-64 Details

Total release size: 16.0 MB

Release files / fusedtok-1.3.1.tar.gz

Download URL fusedtok-1.3.1.tar.gz
Size 621.0 kB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
f6bb772e89d40dcb838bca15ef8e93bd948b1a8f9deb683332d8714fb710b2a2
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
01cc1bf8865c968095fb187597c3c3a0c1ef02da74669d1fa180af7eb198a7aa
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 3, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / fusedtok-1.3.1-cp313-cp313-win_amd64.whl

Download URL fusedtok-1.3.1-cp313-cp313-win_amd64.whl
Size 2.1 MB
Tags CPython 3.13 Windows x86-64
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
bb8e0be5054ba2acbaf3a2115ba4687473799b0fe825f16f1061107b791a9fff
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
74f09be49619fdcc37dd4579d70dae5708a05585e7b059cdfedc2de0594780d9
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 3, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / fusedtok-1.3.1-cp313-cp313-manylinux_2_34_x86_64.whl

Download URL fusedtok-1.3.1-cp313-cp313-manylinux_2_34_x86_64.whl
Size 2.3 MB
Tags CPython 3.13 Linux glibc 2.34+ x86-64
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
6fad4c10b4496077e4d3601b505bf5fb23c4450570201c2be4143d9e3b58d1cd
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
9be98affcfc8fa8a9e344eba03c4d9df449a54c6958833222bb9d1acfcc3fe8f
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 3, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / fusedtok-1.3.1-cp312-cp312-win_amd64.whl

Download URL fusedtok-1.3.1-cp312-cp312-win_amd64.whl
Size 2.1 MB
Tags CPython 3.12 Windows x86-64
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
ae422547512a9a986d49c02df2548100824dd91bce6620bdb1b171f73f5d7d78
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
38de6bcf083cb3f7d37b54231243adaf3129b8978e32025db860309c78cdfa09
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 3, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / fusedtok-1.3.1-cp312-cp312-manylinux_2_34_x86_64.whl

Download URL fusedtok-1.3.1-cp312-cp312-manylinux_2_34_x86_64.whl
Size 2.3 MB
Tags CPython 3.12 Linux glibc 2.34+ x86-64
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
647ca8e4248ef8e30e41c0bca171a4eceb1b5e0bc52fdd15e307c67f01982b7a
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
08b561820bfa3138b1e09e49c842176eb5d64cdfcd53efe440748160b90f1c6e
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 3, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / fusedtok-1.3.1-cp311-cp311-win_amd64.whl

Download URL fusedtok-1.3.1-cp311-cp311-win_amd64.whl
Size 2.1 MB
Tags CPython 3.11 Windows x86-64
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
a2074de76ac42cae8ab38d03af9f5549c0a75616a2e6550616be15a513a2dbd1
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
8391937ee75a16dc63a38e40d37ea00e5b23d3ce9799a8cf35f8711d1612642f
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 3, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / fusedtok-1.3.1-cp311-cp311-manylinux_2_34_x86_64.whl

Download URL fusedtok-1.3.1-cp311-cp311-manylinux_2_34_x86_64.whl
Size 2.3 MB
Tags CPython 3.11 Linux glibc 2.34+ x86-64
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
6eaac9be690aeb5bf5d2a265e38b6ec0ad53b24eb1af9ed80835919e1efebecf
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
ef62c4eed0b8c245f22315fa5286d6e793b0158791c766ab46ccec073e6f7cf9
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 3, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / fusedtok-1.3.1-cp310-cp310-manylinux_2_34_x86_64.whl

Download URL fusedtok-1.3.1-cp310-cp310-manylinux_2_34_x86_64.whl
Size 2.3 MB
Tags CPython 3.10 Linux glibc 2.34+ x86-64
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
2257e88cbd848ee2b73308e60b788020bacd85889907a889c7c314ca704a59e9
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
64f4a9514c2fce2c98e8246195323115f9c3c2f33bc84b7c39463572c7ba903c
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 3, 2026.

Transparency log

Release history Release notifications | RSS feed

2.5.0

7 release files

2.4.4

7 release files

2.4.3

7 release files

2.4.2

7 release files

2.4.1

7 release files

2.4.0

7 release files

2.3.0

7 release files

2.2.1

7 release files

2.2.0

7 release files

2.1.1

7 release files

2.1.0

7 release files

2.0.2

7 release files

2.0.1

7 release files

2.0.0

7 release files

1.8.2

8 release files

1.8.1

8 release files

1.8.0

8 release files

1.7.0

8 release files

1.6.1

8 release files

1.6.0

8 release files

1.5.2

8 release files

1.5.1

8 release files

1.5.0

8 release files

1.4.1

8 release files

1.4.0

8 release files

This release

1.3.1 This release

8 release files

1.3.0

8 release files

1.2.1

8 release files

1.2.0

8 release files

1.1.3

8 release files

1.1.2

8 release files

1.1.1

8 release files

1.1.0

8 release files

1.0.1

8 release files

1.0.0

8 release files

0.5.1

3 release files

0.5.0

3 release files

0.4.1

2 release files

0.4.0

2 release files

0.3.1

2 release files

0.3.0

2 release files

0.2.1

2 release files

0.2.0

2 release files

0.1.2

2 release files

0.1.1

2 release files

0.1.0

2 release files

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page