Skip to main content

inferlint

CI PyPI Python License

inferlint measures what your inference server actually did—and flags what it didn't tell you.

For vLLM, SGLang and TensorRT-LLM. Measure achieved concurrency, preemptions, KV-cache behavior, GPU state, timing quality, and other signals that can silently invalidate inference results.

A serving benchmark can be wrong without an error. vLLM preempts a running request and writes no log line; only a counter moves. TensorRT-LLM pauses requests for recompute and counts none. SGLang can lower its running limit at start-up and still report the limit it was given. A config can start cleanly and fail on its first request. Two starts with the same flags can size different KV pools. Killing the API server can leave the engine process holding the GPU. None of these raise an error, and each changes the numbers.

inferlint runs around a benchmark. It reads the server's boot log and Prometheus counters, measures what happened, and flags each of these problems when it occurs. It tells the engine from the server command, its metrics and its log. Your load tool (each engine's own benchmark client, or any other) sends the requests; inferlint checks what the server did with them.

Tutorial · Example report · Reference · Changelog

Try it in 30 seconds, without a GPU

The repository includes the files from a recorded run:

pipx install inferlint
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/radianvector/inferlint && cd inferlint
inferlint series tests/fixtures/vllm-0.28/live/run.series.jsonl \
    --snapshot tests/fixtures/vllm-0.28/live/after.snapshot.json --requested 32
[T14] PASS  gauge denominator is 42 = num_gpu_blocks (43) - 1 null block
[ T9] WARN  ceiling moved between 7 and 10 as requests grew (one request held 9.5% to 14.3% of the cache); concurrency was not a constant of this run
[ T8] TRIPWIRE-FAILED  requested 32 concurrent, server never ran more than 10

That run is vLLM 0.28. Recorded SGLang and TensorRT-LLM runs are in tests/fixtures/sglang-0.5/ and tests/fixtures/trtllm-1.3/; the same commands read them.

Check your own run with one command

The same load, 32 requests at once with 88 prompt and 1,000 output tokens each, sent by each engine's own benchmark client:

# vLLM
inferlint xray -o run/ --serve "vllm serve MODEL --max-model-len 16384" \
    -- vllm bench serve --model MODEL --dataset-name random --random-input-len 88 \
       --random-output-len 1000 --ignore-eos --num-prompts 32 --max-concurrency 32

# SGLang: its metrics need --enable-metrics
inferlint xray -o run/ --serve "sglang serve --model-path MODEL --enable-metrics" \
    -- python -m sglang.benchmark.serving --model MODEL --dataset-name random-ids \
       --random-input-len 88 --random-output-len 1000 --random-range-ratio 1 \
       --num-prompts 32 --max-concurrency 32

# TensorRT-LLM: its metrics need two settings in the --config file
printf 'return_perf_metrics: true\nenable_iter_perf_stats: true\n' > llm_api.yaml
inferlint xray -o run/ --serve "trtllm-serve serve MODEL --config llm_api.yaml" \
    -- python -m tensorrt_llm.serve.scripts.benchmark_serving --model MODEL \
       --dataset-name random --random-ids --random-input-len 88 --random-output-len 1000 \
       --ignore-eos --num-prompts 32 --max-concurrency 32

Output from the vLLM 0.28 run described below, on an RTX 4090 (paths and the load command shortened, the benchmark's own output left out):

== is the GPU free?
[ T2] PASS  2 consecutive clear readings
== start the server (output in run/boot.log)
== boot log
[T12] PASS  no failure in log
[ T5] WARN  attention block size forced to 784 tokens (requested 16); each request's KV is allocated in 784-token units
[ T6] PASS  nothing to check: the server was started without --attention-backend, so vLLM chose its own (FLASH_ATTN) and nothing could be ignored; there was no draft model either
== probe: one request, then 8 at once
[ T7] PASS  1 + 8 concurrent requests served, server alive
== load: vllm bench serve --model MODEL ... --max-concurrency 32 --save-result --result-dir run --result-filename bench.json
== checks
[ T1] TRIPWIRE-FAILED  21 preemptions during the run
[T10] PASS  314.99 tokens/s over 101.590s; an integer-second timer would say 313.73 (-0.40%)
[T14] PASS  gauge denominator is 42 = num_gpu_blocks (43) - 1 null block
[ T9] WARN  ceiling moved between 5 and 10 as requests grew (one request held 9.5% to 19.0% of the cache); concurrency was not a constant of this run
[ T8] TRIPWIRE-FAILED  requested 32 concurrent, server never ran more than 10
[T15] PASS  client and server agree: 32 requests, 32,000 output tokens
== stop the server
[ T2] PASS  2 consecutive clear readings
== what limited this run
- The server ran fewer requests at once than the load sent. The load kept 32 requests open, but the server ran at most 10 at once. It also preempted 21 running requests.
- Requests waited long to start. Half the requests waited more than 28.9 s for their first token, the slowest (p99) 73.4 s, most of it in the queue.
- The run reached 26% of its pace. A running request got a token every 25.1 ms, so 32 at once could produce about 1,273 tokens/s. The run averaged 336, 26% of that: on average 8 requests ran at once, not 32.
12 checks (8 pass, 2 warn, 2 tripwire-failed)
report: run/report.html
files:  run

xray checks that the GPU is free, starts the server and saves its boot log, sends 9 probe requests, records the server's counters and gauges around the load command after --, runs every tripwire that applies, says what limited the run, and writes run/report.html and run/results.json. It always stops the server at the end, also after a failure or Ctrl-C. It finds the server at the --host and --port of the --serve command, or the engine's default port (8000; SGLang 30000). Without --serve it attaches to a server that is already running (--url, --boot-log). Exit status: 0 when every tripwire passed, 1 when one failed or the run did not complete, 2 when one could not decide.

For the three engines' benchmark clients (vllm bench serve, python -m sglang.benchmark.serving, python -m tensorrt_llm.serve.scripts.benchmark_serving), xray asks the client to save its result in the run folder, compares the client's own counts with the server's (T15), and reads --max-concurrency as the concurrency asked for (T8). Any other load tool runs as it is.

To check the folder again later, on any computer: inferlint report run/. It finds the files by name, prints the verdicts, and rewrites run/report.html.

One engine for the whole team. inferlint tells the engine from what it reads, so no setting is needed. A team that always runs the same engine can name it once:

export INFERLINT_ENGINE=sglang     # or --engine sglang on any command

An input from another engine is then refused with exit status 2 (a snapshot from a server on the wrong port, a file from another run), and teardown stops only that engine's servers. docs/engines.md lists what each engine needs and where the tripwires differ.

One run, measured

vLLM 0.28 on an RTX 4090, a 27B hybrid attention/Mamba model with 4-bit weights and CUDA graphs on. 32 concurrent requests, 1,000 output tokens each:

$ inferlint preemption before.json after.json
[ T1] TRIPWIRE-FAILED  22 preemptions during the run
$ grep -ci preempt boot.log
0
$ inferlint series run.series.jsonl --snapshot after.json --requested 32
[T14] PASS  gauge denominator is 42 = num_gpu_blocks (43) - 1 null block
[ T9] WARN  ceiling moved between 7 and 10 as requests grew (one request held 9.5% to 14.3% of the cache); concurrency was not a constant of this run
[ T8] TRIPWIRE-FAILED  requested 32 concurrent, server never ran more than 10
  • The client held 32 requests in flight. The server never ran more than 10 at once.
  • A fresh request held 4 KV blocks, so 10 fit. As outputs crossed the 784-token block boundary, running requests held up to 6 blocks each on average, and the number that fit fell as low as 7. Each fall evicted running requests, 22 times in all, and the server log says nothing about it.
  • The server exports 43 KV blocks, but the usage gauge counts in 42nds. One block is reserved and never holds a request.

Then the API server was killed with SIGKILL, as a crash or the OOM killer would:

$ pkill -9 -f "vllm[ ]serve"; sleep 20
$ ps -eo pid,ppid,rss,args | grep -E "[V]LLM::|[v]llm serve"
   1030     423 2733144 VLLM::EngineCore
$ inferlint gpu-inspect          # the GPU's model and memory lines are left out here
[ T2] TRIPWIRE-FAILED  card not clear; refusing to boot. ... 21768 MiB used, 1 server processes alive
$ inferlint teardown
target  pid=1030     VLLM::EngineCore
(pkill -f 'vllm serve' would miss 1 and wrongly hit 0)
[ T2] PASS  2 consecutive clear readings

The engine outlived its parent and kept 21.3 GiB of the card. The usual cleanup pattern cannot see it, and the next start would have loaded a second copy into what was left. The same run on vLLM 0.29 and 0.30 gave the same findings (below). The xray output above is a second run on 0.28: 21 preemptions instead of 22, and a lowest ceiling of 5 instead of 7, with the same tripwires failing and warning. The raw files are in tests/fixtures/, and tests/test_live.py and tests/test_compat.py pin every number.

One model, three engines

Qwen3-8B in bf16 on the same RTX 4090, 16,384-token context, at most 32 running, and the same load sent by vllm bench serve to each engine:

vLLM 0.30 SGLang 0.5.20 TensorRT-LLM 1.3.0rc29
KV pool 32,336 tokens (47,888 on a second start) 32,096 tokens 37,760 tokens
Most running at once (T8) 32 29 32
Preempted (T1) 3 preemptions, no log line 0 retractions 0 pauses in its log
Output tokens per second 1,274 799 1,389
Client and server counts (T15) agree agree agree

Each engine's own benchmark client, on the same servers: TensorRT-LLM's gave the same result (32 at once, no pauses, 1,405 tokens per second). SGLang's, which sends requests to SGLang's native /generate endpoint, ran all 32 at once with 3 retractions, at 1,337 to 1,342 tokens per second in three runs, against 799 and 800 in two runs with vllm bench serve; whether the endpoint or the client makes the difference has not been tested. With SGLang's defaults for the running limit (2048) and context length, its own client reached 821. The two vLLM starts had the same flags; the first compiled the model from scratch and left 4.44 GiB for the KV cache instead of 6.58 GiB (T4, T11). docs/engines.md has the details.

Tested versions

vLLM 0.28, 0.29 and 0.30, SGLang 0.5.20 and TensorRT-LLM 1.3.0rc29 (a release candidate), each live on an RTX 4090 (WSL2, driver 616.56).

vLLM

Each tripwire on each tested release, with the 27B model and load above:

tripwire what the run showed 0.28 (two runs) 0.29 0.30
T1 silent-preemption preemptions; none in the log live: 22 / 21 live: 21 live: 22
T2 orphaned-engine MiB the engine kept after the API server was killed live: 21,768 live: 21,522 live: 21,872
T4 pool-size-jump KV pool, starts with the same flags recorded: a 9.4% jump live: same in 2 starts live: same in 2 starts
T5 large-kv-blocks attention block size, tokens live: 784 live: 784 live: 784
T6 backend-ignored requested backend not applied to the drafter recorded not tested not tested
T7 crash-after-ready probe after ready live (healthy); a crash recorded live (healthy) live (healthy)
T8 concurrency-not-reached most requests running at once, of 32 live: 10 / 10 live: 10 live: 11; admission control
T9 falling-ceiling concurrency ceiling, highest → lowest live: 10 → 7 / 10 → 5 live: 10 → 5 live: 11 → 7
T10 integer-second-timer rate from exact timestamps live live live
T11 kv-memory-drift KV memory, starts with the same flags recorded: drift live: same in 2 starts live: same in 2 starts
T12 unexplained-failure real start-up failures named live: 1; recorded: 1 live: 1 live: 3
T14 null-block usable of exported KV blocks live: 42 of 43 live: 42 of 43 live: 47 of 48
T15 client-server-mismatch load tool's counts against the server's live: agree live: agree live: agree; also with 16 rejected

T3 and T13 concern shell scripts, not an engine, and do not depend on its version. The counts differ a little from run to run: 0.28 shows both of its runs.

SGLang and TensorRT-LLM

Each tripwire with Qwen3-8B (bf16) and the load above, and with the 27B model where it loads (TensorRT-LLM fails to read its weight-only 4-bit checkpoint, and T12 names why):

tripwire what the run showed SGLang 0.5.20 TensorRT-LLM 1.3.0rc29
T1 silent-preemption requests preempted (SGLang: retracted; TensorRT-LLM: paused) live: 1 retraction with --schedule-conservativeness 0.3; 3 with SGLang's own benchmark client; none with vllm bench serve live: 13 pauses, counted from its log, with MAX_UTILIZATION; none with the default policy
T2 orphaned-engine engine processes after the front end was killed live: none; its workers ended too live: none; its MPI workers ended too
T4 pool-size-jump KV pool, starts with the same flags live: same in 2 starts live: same in 2 starts
T5 large-kv-blocks KV allocation unit, tokens live: 1 live: 32
T6 backend-ignored requested backend not applied to the drafter not tested not tested
T7 crash-after-ready probe after ready live (healthy); an error it survived is not a crash live (healthy)
T8 concurrency-not-reached most requests running at once, of 32 live: 29; 1 with the 27B model, where it lowered its own limit live: 32
T9 falling-ceiling concurrency ceiling, highest → lowest live: 31 → 30 live: 35, from 2 readings
T10 integer-second-timer rate from exact timestamps live live
T11 kv-memory-drift KV memory, starts with the same flags live: same in 2 starts live: same in 2 starts
T12 unexplained-failure real start-up failures named live: 2 live: 2
T14 null-block reserved KV block does not apply does not apply
T15 client-server-mismatch load tool's counts against the server's live: agree, with vllm bench serve and with SGLang's own client live: agree, with vllm bench serve and with TensorRT-LLM's own client

live: measured on a running server of that version. recorded: tested on recorded files from that version. A boot log from a release not listed here makes inferlint print a warning (SGLang's version is read from the server), since log lines and metric names change between releases.

Setting up the vLLM runs on WSL with pip-installed CUDA hit five start-up failures, and T12 named the cause of each (details in docs/tripwires.md). The fixes: VLLM_USE_V2_MODEL_RUNNER=0 on 0.29; on 0.29 and 0.30, a CUDA 13.0 compiler matching torch's CUDA runtime for FlashInfer's kernel builds; on 0.28, VLLM_USE_FLASHINFER_SAMPLER=0, as in the recorded run.

What it checks

id name trap command
T1 silent-preemption a preempted request leaves no log line (vLLM) or no count (TensorRT-LLM) inferlint preemption BEFORE AFTER
T2 orphaned-engine pkill -f "vllm serve" misses the renamed VLLM::EngineCore; engines run in processes the server command does not name inferlint teardown, inferlint gpu-inspect
T3 cleanup-self-kill pkill -f in a shell one-liner kills the shell inferlint teardown
T4 pool-size-jump the KV pool is sized per start, in discrete steps inferlint check-log BOOT...
T5 large-kv-blocks on vLLM, hybrid models force a large attention block (the allocation unit) inferlint check-log
T6 backend-ignored the requested attention backend is not applied to the speculative drafter inferlint check-log
T7 crash-after-ready a config starts, then dies on its first request inferlint probe URL, inferlint check-log
T8 concurrency-not-reached requested concurrency is not achieved concurrency inferlint series --requested N
T9 falling-ceiling the concurrency ceiling is floor(1 / share), and it falls as requests grow inferlint series
T10 integer-second-timer integer-second timers are off by up to a second at each end inferlint rate BEFORE AFTER
T11 kv-memory-drift KV memory differs between starts with the same flags inferlint check-log BOOT...
T12 unexplained-failure start-up failures recorded without a cause inferlint check-log
T13 stale-waiter a killed campaign's waiter adopts the next server docs/orchestration.md
T14 null-block vLLM's KV usage gauge counts out of num_gpu_blocks - 1 inferlint series --snapshot
T15 client-server-mismatch the load tool's counts differ from the server's inferlint xray

Each is described in docs/tripwires.md with its symptom, why it changes results, and a command that reproduces it from files in this repository, and what differs on each engine. inferlint explain T9 (or inferlint explain falling-ceiling) prints the same in the terminal; --engine sglang shows only that engine's notes.

Install

pipx install inferlint
inferlint --help

pipx gives inferlint an environment of its own and puts the command on your PATH, so it works in any terminal and from any folder, with nothing to activate. uv tool install inferlint does the same. To use it as a library, install it into your project's environment with pip install inferlint (see Use it from Python).

Python 3.10+, no dependencies. teardown, xray --serve, and the free-GPU check in gpu-inspect find the server's processes through /proc, so they need Linux (or WSL), where the engines run. Everything else runs anywhere.

Use the commands one at a time

xray runs the sequence below for you. The separate commands are for scripts that need to control each step. A test with inferlint takes as long as your benchmark. It checks one test at a time; it is not a monitor for a server that runs for days (Prometheus and Grafana do that job).

Use two terminals on the GPU machine, in the same folder: A runs the server, B runs everything else.

# 1. Before the server starts (B)
inferlint gpu-inspect                  # which GPU, its memory; fails if an old server still holds it

# 2. Start the server (A): your usual command, saving its start-up output
vllm serve MODEL 2>&1 | tee boot.log   # wait for "Application startup complete"
#    or: sglang serve --model-path MODEL --enable-metrics 2>&1 | tee boot.log
#    or: trtllm-serve serve MODEL --config llm_api.yaml 2>&1 | tee boot.log

#    then check it (B)
inferlint check-log boot.log           # block size, attention backend, start-up failures
inferlint probe http://127.0.0.1:8000  # sends 9 small requests: does it answer?

# 3. The test (B)
inferlint snapshot http://127.0.0.1:8000 -o before.json
inferlint watch http://127.0.0.1:8000 -o run.series.jsonl --interval 0.25 &
vllm bench serve --model MODEL --max-concurrency 32 ...   # your benchmark sends the load
inferlint snapshot http://127.0.0.1:8000 -o after.json
kill %1                                # stops the recording

# 4. The verdict: one HTML page (any time later, on any computer)
inferlint report -o run.html --requested 32 --boot-log boot.log \
    --before before.json --after after.json --series run.series.jsonl

# 5. Stop the server (B)
inferlint teardown                     # stops every server process, waits until the GPU is free
  • Your benchmark sends the requests and reports speed and latency. inferlint reads the server's side and says which of those numbers hold.
  • --requested is the concurrency your benchmark asked for (--max-concurrency in all three engines' benchmark clients). Requests, tokens and preemptions come from the server's counters.
  • SGLang and TensorRT-LLM serve metrics only when asked: --enable-metrics, and return_perf_metrics: true with enable_iter_perf_stats: true (without it, no running, waiting or KV gauges) in the file given to trtllm-serve --config. SGLang listens on port 30000 unless given --port, so its URL is http://127.0.0.1:30000. TensorRT-LLM counts no pauses and logs each one, so give preemption and report its log saved until after the run (--boot-log boot.log).
  • Each command does one job and exits, except watch. They only read, except probe (9 small requests) and teardown, which stops the server: don't run it against a server that is serving users.
  • The same verdicts in the terminal: inferlint preemption before.json after.json (T1), inferlint rate before.json after.json (T10), inferlint series run.series.jsonl --snapshot after.json --requested 32 (T8, T9, T14).
  • T4 and T11 compare start-ups: keep the log of each start with the same settings and pass them all (--boot-log boot1.log --boot-log boot2.log).
  • In scripts, inferlint gpu-inspect || exit 1 and inferlint probe http://127.0.0.1:8000 || exit 1 stop a run before it produces bad numbers. docs/orchestration.md covers scripts that run many tests.

A failed tripwire prints as TRIPWIRE-FAILED: the tripwire caught its problem. For T7 and T12 that means the server failed; for every other tripwire the server worked, but a number from the run does not mean what it seems. Exit status is 0 when every tripwire passes (warnings allowed), 1 when one fails, and 2 when one cannot decide because a series or a log line was missing. A missing series is never read as zero. A tripwire about a behaviour the engine does not have prints N/A and says so (T14, vLLM's reserved KV block, on SGLang and TensorRT-LLM); it does not change the exit status. --json gives machine-readable results ("status": "fail" for a failed tripwire, "not_applicable" for one that does not apply); --strict fails on warnings.

The report

inferlint report turns a run's files into one HTML page. It opens with what limited the run, in up to three sentences: whether the KV cache could hold the load, whether requests waited to start, and how much of the throughput its per-token speed allows the run reached. Then a plain-English account of what happened (how long the test ran, requests finished and failed, tokens generated, time spent queued, which tripwires were checked and which need other files), the verdicts, with passed checks folded under one line, charts of what the server did over time and of its KV cache against the load, the boot facts and GPU memory, and a guide to every tripwire. Collapsible glossaries explain the terms (token, KV pool, block, preemption) and what Pass, Warning, Tripwire failed, Can't tell and Does not apply mean.

The page fetches nothing, so it opens offline and can be attached to a ticket as it is. It has a light/dark switch, every chart has a data table, and hovering (or the arrow keys) reads values at any moment.

The report for the live run: what limited it, what happened, the headline numbers, 2 failed tripwires and 2 warnings

See a full example. The complete report for the run above has the charts, the findings and both glossaries. The same file is in this repository as docs/example-report.html, and it works offline.

Try it without a GPU. The example is built from the recorded run in this repository. Download the repository for its files, and make the report yourself:

git clone https://github.com/radianvector/inferlint
cd inferlint
inferlint report tests/fixtures/vllm-0.28/live --requested 32 \
    --title "vLLM 0.28 on an RTX 4090" -o example-report.html

Use it from Python

Install it into your project's environment with pip install inferlint. Every check returns a CheckResult with a status (pass, warn, fail, unknown or not_applicable), a message, and the evidence behind it.

import subprocess

from inferlint import bootlog, checks, telemetry

url = "http://127.0.0.1:8000"
before = telemetry.scrape(url)
subprocess.run(["vllm", "bench", "serve", "--model", "MODEL"], check=True)  # your benchmark
after = telemetry.scrape(url)

result = checks.check_no_preemption(before, after)
print(result.status.value, result.message)  # fail 22 preemptions during the run
result.raise_for_status()  # raises TripwireFailed on a failed tripwire or a Can't tell

facts = bootlog.parse_file("boot.log")
print(facts.attention_block_size, facts.kv_pool_tokens)  # 784 26093
record = {"boot": facts.result_block()}  # pool, block size, backend: keep with your results

raise_for_status() lets warnings through; raise_for_status(allow_warn=False) stops on them too.

module what it gives you
bootlog the facts in a start-up log (parse_file)
telemetry the server's counters (scrape, load)
series recordings made during a run (watch, read)
checks the tripwires, each returning a CheckResult
catalog each tripwire's code, name and explanation (TRIPWIRES, lookup)
probe the first-request check (T7)
gpu which GPU, its family and memory (read_gpus)
teardown stopping the server and waiting for a free GPU (Linux)
report the HTML report (build, render)
benchresult a benchmark client's result file: vLLM's, SGLang's or TensorRT-LLM's (load)
xray the whole sequence in one call (run, Plan)
engines the three engines and how each is told apart (from_command, from_log)
metricnames every metric name inferlint reads (VLLM, SGLANG, TRTLLM)

How it is tested

  • Real evidence. Fixtures are boot logs, metrics and benchmark results from vLLM 0.28, 0.29 and 0.30, SGLang 0.5.20 and TensorRT-LLM 1.3.0rc29 on an RTX 4090, with paths removed. Each check is tested against the case it exists for, and tests/test_every_engine.py runs every command on a run from each engine.
  • Every check is watched failing. tests/test_mutations.py changes one number or line in real evidence from each engine and requires the verdict to flip.
  • Instruments against ground truth. The probe runs against a mock server with known failure modes. Block-count inference (T14) is checked against the count the server exports. The teardown's process matching runs on a synthetic /proc that includes the shell one-liner and a bystander. GPU facts are parsed from real nvidia-smi output.
  • Unknown formats are reported, not defaulted. When a known log line changes format in a new release, boot-facts lists it as unparsed instead of returning a value, and a boot log from an untested release prints a warning.
  • xray against a mock server. The whole sequence runs in the tests against a mock server of each engine with known counters, including other traffic (T15) and a server that dies during start-up.

Contribute

The most useful contribution is a recorded run from an engine version or GPU that is not in the tables above: inferlint xray -o run/ ... saves every file needed. CONTRIBUTING.md says how to share it, how to set up the code, and what a new tripwire needs. GitHub Actions runs the tests, lint and type checks on every push and pull request, on Python 3.10 to 3.13. This tests inferlint's own code; it is not a GitHub Action for your benchmarks. Security problems: see SECURITY.md.

Status

Alpha. Tested live on vLLM 0.28, 0.29 and 0.30, SGLang 0.5.20 and TensorRT-LLM 1.3.0rc29, on one GPU model (RTX 4090). Next: more GPUs and models from contributed runs.

About

inferlint is made by RadianVector. RadianVector develops tools and research for evaluating and improving AI systems.

License

Copyright 2026 RadianVector.

This project, including the recorded evidence in tests/fixtures/, is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. See LICENSE for details.

Metadata

Release files for inferlint 0.3.0

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for inferlint 0.3.0
File Size Uploaded
inferlint-0.3.0.tar.gz 1.5 MB Details

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for inferlint 0.3.0
File Interpreter ABI Platform
inferlint-0.3.0-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details

Total release size: 1.6 MB

Release files / inferlint-0.3.0.tar.gz

Download URL inferlint-0.3.0.tar.gz
Size 1.5 MB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
4c1de82ad6c843cbefcfc4198cfef382300e6d96111e507eceb334b283749aa7
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
6c63515a7f1dc740d642f8309a09040173dbda7b0c8d236440ddd3b82c1ae466
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 1, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / inferlint-0.3.0-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL inferlint-0.3.0-py3-none-any.whl
Size 113.9 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
66eb6b6454418712425cc887af2bdfbcfb30697714f1aa83db297b9b0f2529a0
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
2aba4af067e1b8f0451025d229440b89e3e345dd40322a8c0af8fbdd49408fe7
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Oct 1, 2026.

Transparency log

Release history Release notifications | RSS feed

0.3.1

2 release files

This release

0.3.0 This release

2 release files

0.2.0

2 release files

0.1.1

2 release files

0.1.0

2 release files

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page