Skip to main content

jevper

jevper wraps any OpenAI-like client and gives you a Jev (TypeSafe System One) shaped answer instead of prose: you send a state plus typed questions, and you get back probabilities and confidence.

It does not call the hosted TypeSafe API and does not depend on typesafe-sdk or openai at runtime — the client object is duck-typed. Any object exposing responses.create or chat.completions.create works, including a self-hosted llama.cpp server.

from openai import OpenAI
from jevper import Choice, SystemOneClient

client = SystemOneClient(OpenAI(), model="gpt-5.6-terra", method="logprobs")

response = client.system_one(
    state="I was charged twice for the same subscription this month.",
    questions={
        "intent": Choice(
            instructions="Pick the intent of the message.",
            criteria={
                "billing": "money, invoices, refunds, charges",
                "technical": "errors, crashes, login or performance problems",
                "sales": "pricing, plans, purchasing, upgrades",
            },
        )
    },
)

answer = response.answers["intent"]
answer.choice        # "billing"
answer.probabilities # {"billing": 0.88, "technical": 0.08, "sales": 0.03}
answer.confidence    # 0.83

Install

pip install jevper

Python 3.10+. The only runtime dependency is pydantic>=2.7.

For development:

git clone https://github.com/zhulinchng/jevper && cd jevper
uv venv && uv pip install -e '.[test]'
pytest -q

What one call does

flowchart LR
    A["state + questions"] --> B["build_messages: system prompt, state turns, few-shot turns, question block"]
    B --> C{"method"}
    C -->|logprobs| D["logprobs=true, top_logprobs=20"]
    C -->|grammar| E["+ GBNF grammar in extra_body"]
    C -->|structured| F["strict JSON schema: probabilities"]
    C -->|discrete| G["strict JSON schema: one label"]
    D --> H["first label token -> softmax over the labels"]
    E --> H
    F --> I["probability dict from JSON"]
    G --> J["one-hot from the chosen label"]
    H --> K["Answer: choice / noul / score"]
    I --> K
    J --> K

Each question becomes its own provider call, so questions are independent and run concurrently (max_concurrency, default 8). Answers come back keyed by your question ids, in insertion order.

Questions

Three types, mirroring the Jev API:

Type Criteria Answer
Noul(instructions=..., criteria={"true": ..., "false": ...}) optional {"type": "noul", "noul": 0.93}
Choice(instructions=..., criteria={"billing": "...", ...}) 2–26 keys {"type": "choice", "choice": "billing", "probabilities": {...}, "confidence": 0.83}
Score(instructions=..., criteria=["Calm", "Frustrated", "Very angry"]) 2–10 levels {"type": "score", "score": 1.05, "legend": {...}, "probabilities": {...}, "confidence": 0.92}

Score.score is the probability-weighted level index (Σ i·pᵢ, levels zero-based), as in the Jev API. Choice is capped at 26 options because every method labels options with single letters AZ; a larger question raises InvalidQuestionError telling you to split it.

Questions can also be passed as raw mappings ({"type": "choice", "criteria": {...}}) and are validated the same way.

Methods

method= decides how the decision is elicited. All four share the same 26-label cap and the same label→option mapping, so switching methods does not change your types.

Method Request Readout Needs
logprobs (default) logprobs=true, top_logprobs=20 softmax over the labels' logprobs of the first answer token a provider that returns chat logprobs (or the Responses surface with include logprobs)
grammar the same plus a GBNF grammar in extra_body same as logprobs a Chat Completions server that accepts grammar (llama.cpp and friends)
structured strict JSON schema, model returns a probability per option the model's own numbers, rescaled to sum 1 when off by more than 1e-6 JSON-schema structured output
discrete strict JSON schema, model returns one option one-hot distribution JSON-schema structured output

logprobs is the default because it needs no provider-specific field beyond logprobs, and it reads the model's real distribution rather than a sampled answer. See docs/methods.md for the exact request bodies, readout rules and failure modes.

Reasoning

Pass reasoning=ReasoningConfig(...) to make the model think before it classifies:

from jevper import ReasoningConfig, reasoning_text

client = SystemOneClient(OpenAI(), model="gpt-5.6-terra", reasoning=ReasoningConfig(effort="medium"))

response = client.system_one(state=..., questions=...)
reasoning_text(response.reasoning)   # the trace, as text

mode="auto" (the default) uses native provider reasoning on the Responses surface and a two-step think-then-classify path on Chat Completions, where the analysis text is replayed as an assistant turn before the answer. The trace always lands on response.reasoning, and the two-step analysis call's usage is counted in response.usage. See docs/reasoning.md.

Few-shot examples

Examples are chat turns (example state + question block, then the expected answer), so the demonstration is always in the format the active method expects. They can be attached at three levels:

from jevper import Choice, Example, SystemOneClient

question = Choice(
    criteria={"billing": "...", "technical": "..."},
    examples=[Example(state="Charged twice for one order", answer="billing")],
)

client = SystemOneClient(OpenAI(), model="gpt-5.6-terra",
                         examples=[Example(state="Login fails", answer="technical")])  # fallback for every question

client.system_one(state=..., questions={"intent": question},
                  examples={"intent": [...]})  # or a bare sequence for all questions

Precedence is question → per call → constructor, and the first non-empty level wins. examples is excluded from model_dump(), so question dumps keep exactly the Jev wire keys. See docs/few-shot.md.

Response

response.model                 # the model actually used
response.answers               # {"intent": ChoiceAnswer(...)}
response.nouls / .choices / .scores   # filtered views
response.usage                 # input_tokens, output_tokens, reasoning_tokens, n_calls, n_retries, latency
response.reasoning             # tuple[ReasoningContentPart, ...]
response.debug                 # per-attempt requests/responses, retry reasons, normalization notes

response.model_dump_json() serializes to the Jev answer shape — the answer field names and JSON keys match POST /v1/systemone. Token counts are None when any constituent call omitted them; n_calls counts every provider call including analysis passes and corrective retries, while n_retries counts transient-failure retries only. See docs/api.md for the full reference.

Failures

Local problems fail before any request is sent: an invalid question, an empty questions mapping, an unusable state, or grammar on a surface that cannot carry a grammar.

Error Raised when
InvalidQuestionError question or few-shot example is locally invalid
UnsupportedMethodError method="grammar" on the Responses surface
ClientCapabilityError the client lacks the attribute the chosen surface needs, or returned no choices
LabelReadoutError the first answer token is not a label, or no logprobs came back
MalformedAnswerError the JSON answer had an unusable shape after corrective retries
ProviderError a provider call failed; .attempts carries the attempt history

Transient failures (HTTP 429/500/502/503/504/529, or an exception whose class name contains Connection or Timeout) are retried per call with RetryPolicy(n_retries=2, base_delay=0.5, max_delay=8.0) and exponential backoff min(base_delay · 3ⁿ, max_delay). Unreadable answers get one corrective retry (n_retry_malformed) with the failure appended to the conversation. ProviderError propagates after all questions have settled, in question insertion order.

Verification

pytest -q                      # the whole suite runs against a local stub HTTP server; no network, no API keys
ruff check src tests           # clean except three PYI034 hints (see docs/internals.md)

The suite drives a real openai SDK client at a stdlib ThreadingHTTPServer stub, so the SDK's own serialization path is exercised; see docs/internals.md.

Optional live check, skipped unless both variables are set:

LLM_MODEL=gpt-5.6-terra OPENAI_API_KEY=... pytest -q tests/test_live.py

Docs

  • docs/api.md — constructor and system_one parameters, answer/usage/debug shapes, errors
  • docs/methods.md — the four methods, request bodies, readout rules, surface selection
  • docs/reasoning.md — native vs two-step reasoning, traces, encrypted content
  • docs/few-shot.md — example levels, precedence, rendering, structured examples
  • docs/internals.md — module map, call flow, concurrency, retries, testing

License

Apache-2.0 — see LICENSE.

Release files for jevper 0.1.0

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for jevper 0.1.0
File Size Uploaded
jevper-0.1.0.tar.gz 49.0 kB Details

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for jevper 0.1.0
File Interpreter ABI Platform
jevper-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details

Total release size: 80.7 kB

Release files / jevper-0.1.0.tar.gz

Download URL jevper-0.1.0.tar.gz
Size 49.0 kB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
6360977586e237f24c2a3216471da6ab056d42dba518656b86b898b8e6868083
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
2c556e1858172bca29ee3eb59e633b7c66cf0e3b79acab556825683568d41acb
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 23, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / jevper-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL jevper-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl
Size 31.7 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
f63a08856e946882c4ab54c982b47621fc55e76249a793ef35e411a24cf35201
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
7ebf24d521f1cbe91f125d55fbcb0ce6aa27048a763df11b69883e9e8cad3751
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 23, 2026.

Transparency log

Release history Release notifications | RSS feed

0.5.3

2 release files

0.5.2

2 release files

0.5.1

2 release files

0.5.0

2 release files

0.4.0

2 release files

0.3.0

2 release files

0.2.3

2 release files

0.2.2

2 release files

0.2.1

2 release files

0.2.0

2 release files

0.1.3

2 release files

0.1.2

2 release files

0.1.1

2 release files

This release

0.1.0 This release

2 release files

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page