jevper
The Jev interface — state in, typed questions (noul, choice, score) out,
answers carrying probabilities and confidence — on top of any OpenAI-compatible model.
Same call as typesafe-sdk, different backend: point jevper at a hosted LLM or a self-hosted llama.cpp
server and code written for Jev keeps working, unchanged.
It does not call the hosted TypeSafe API and does not depend on typesafe-sdk or openai at runtime — the
client object is duck-typed. Any object exposing responses.create or chat.completions.create works,
including a self-hosted llama.cpp server.
jevperis an independent implementation of the documented System One wire format. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or supported by TypeSafe AI — questions about the API itself belong in their docs.
from openai import OpenAI
from jevper import Choice, SystemOneClient
client = SystemOneClient(OpenAI(), model="gpt-5.6-terra", method="logprobs")
response = client.system_one(
state="I was charged twice for the same subscription this month.",
questions={
"intent": Choice(
instructions="Pick the intent of the message.",
criteria={
"billing": "money, invoices, refunds, charges",
"technical": "errors, crashes, login or performance problems",
"sales": "pricing, plans, purchasing, upgrades",
},
)
},
)
answer = response.answers["intent"]
answer.choice # "billing"
answer.probabilities # {"billing": 0.88, "technical": 0.08, "sales": 0.03}
answer.confidence # 0.83
Install
pip install jevper
Python 3.10+. The only runtime dependency is pydantic>=2.7.
For development:
git clone https://github.com/zhulinchng/jevper && cd jevper
uv venv && uv pip install -e '.[test]'
pytest -q
What one call does
flowchart LR
A["state + questions"] --> B["build_parts + assemble: system prompt, few-shot turns, question block, state turns"]
B --> C{"method (auto resolves first)"}
C -->|logprobs| D["logprobs=true, top_logprobs=20"]
C -->|grammar| E["+ GBNF grammar in extra_body"]
C -->|structured| F["strict JSON schema: probabilities"]
C -->|discrete| G["strict JSON schema: one label"]
D --> H["first label token -> softmax over the labels"]
E --> H
F --> I["probability dict from JSON"]
G --> J["one-hot from the chosen label"]
H --> K["Answer: choice / noul / score"]
I --> K
J --> K
Each question becomes its own provider call, so questions are independent and run concurrently
(max_concurrency, default 8). Answers come back keyed by your question ids, in insertion order.
Questions
Three types, mirroring the Jev API — Noul answers yes/no with one probability, Choice picks one of your
labelled options, Score rates on an ordered scale:
| Type | Criteria | Answer |
|---|---|---|
Noul(instructions=..., criteria={"true": ..., "false": ...}) |
optional | {"type": "noul", "noul": 0.93} |
Choice(instructions=..., criteria={"billing": "...", ...}) |
2–255 keys | {"type": "choice", "choice": "billing", "probabilities": {...}, "confidence": 0.83} |
Score(instructions=..., criteria=["Calm", "Frustrated", "Very angry"]) |
2–10 levels | {"type": "score", "score": 1.05, "legend": {...}, "probabilities": {...}, "confidence": 0.92} |
Score.score is the probability-weighted level index (Σ i·pᵢ, levels zero-based), as in the Jev API.
Choice takes up to 255 options, the Jev API limit. The two methods that read a label token —
logprobs and grammar — stop at 26, because the first token of "AA" is "A"; past 26 options they
raise InvalidQuestionError pointing at structured and discrete, which answer in JSON and use
two-letter labels. The default method="auto" never hits that error: it answers a wide Choice in JSON.
Questions can also be passed as raw mappings ({"type": "choice", "criteria": {...}}) and are validated the
same way.
Methods
method= decides how the decision is elicited. All four share the same label→option mapping, so switching
methods does not change your types; only the label alphabet differs (logprobs and grammar need
single-letter labels, so they cap at 26 options).
| Method | Request | Readout | Needs |
|---|---|---|---|
auto (default) |
logprobs, or structured where the provider cannot return logprobs |
whichever method it resolved to | a provider that returns logprobs, or JSON-schema structured output |
logprobs |
logprobs=true, top_logprobs=20 |
softmax over the labels' logprobs of the first answer token | a provider that returns chat logprobs (or the Responses surface with include logprobs) |
grammar |
the same plus a GBNF grammar in extra_body |
same as logprobs |
a Chat Completions server that accepts grammar (llama.cpp and friends) |
structured |
strict JSON schema, model returns a probability per option | the model's own numbers, rescaled to sum 1 when off by more than 1e-6 |
JSON-schema structured output |
discrete |
strict JSON schema, model returns one option | one-hot distribution | JSON-schema structured output |
auto is the default because logprobs are not universal: OpenAI's reasoning models reject them
(logprobs are not supported with reasoning models.), Anthropic and Gemini's OpenAI-compatibility endpoint
never had them, and a model that returns a logprob with no alternatives gives you no distribution at all.
auto reads the logprobs where they exist — they are one short call and the model's real distribution
rather than a self-report — and answers in JSON where they do not, remembering the verdict per model and
surface. See docs/methods.md for the
provider table, the exact request bodies, the readout rules and the failure modes.
The same holds for the request fields jevper adds: a server that refuses structured output, the reasoning
parameters, the Responses include list or the cache key gets that field dropped and the call re-asked, so a
partially implemented server answers instead of failing. debug["server_limits"] reports what it refused.
Reasoning
Pass reasoning=ReasoningConfig(...) to make the model think before it classifies:
from jevper import ReasoningConfig, reasoning_text
client = SystemOneClient(OpenAI(), model="gpt-5.6-terra", reasoning=ReasoningConfig(effort="medium"))
response = client.system_one(state=..., questions=...)
reasoning_text(response.reasoning) # the trace, as text
mode="auto" (the default) uses native provider reasoning on the Responses surface and a two-step
think-then-classify path on Chat Completions, where the analysis text is replayed as an assistant turn before
the answer. The trace always lands on response.reasoning, and the two-step analysis call's usage is counted
in response.usage. See docs/reasoning.md.
Few-shot examples
Examples are chat turns (question block + example state, then the expected answer), so the demonstration is always in the format the active method expects. They can be attached at three levels:
from jevper import Choice, Example, SystemOneClient
question = Choice(
criteria={"billing": "...", "technical": "..."},
examples=[Example(state="Charged twice for one order", answer="billing")],
)
client = SystemOneClient(OpenAI(), model="gpt-5.6-terra",
examples=[Example(state="Login fails", answer="technical")]) # fallback for every question
client.system_one(state=..., questions={"intent": question},
examples={"intent": [...]}) # or a bare sequence for all questions
Precedence is question → per call → constructor, and the first non-empty level wins. examples is excluded
from model_dump(), so question dumps keep exactly the Jev wire keys. See
docs/few-shot.md.
Response
response.model # the model actually used
response.answers # {"intent": ChoiceAnswer(...)}
response.nouls / .choices / .scores # filtered views
response.usage # input_tokens, output_tokens, reasoning_tokens, cached_tokens, n_calls, n_retries, latency
response.reasoning # tuple[ReasoningContentPart, ...]
response.debug # per-attempt requests/responses, retry reasons, normalization notes
response.model_dump_json() serializes to the Jev answer shape — the answer field names and JSON keys match
POST /v1/systemone. Token counts are None when any constituent call omitted them; n_calls counts the
provider calls that returned a result, including analysis passes and corrective retries, while n_retries
counts transient-failure retries only. A failed attempt appears in debug["llm_attempts"] but not in usage. See docs/api.md for the full reference.
Prompt caching
Every provider that serves these calls caches the prefix of a prompt and reuses it for the next request that starts the same way, and jevper is shaped for it: the state comes last, so the system prompt, the few-shot examples and the question block are identical across every state classified with one rubric.
client = SystemOneClient(OpenAI(), model="gpt-5.6")
client.system_one(state=record_a, questions=rubric)
client.system_one(state=record_b, questions=rubric) # the shared prefix is reused
Two things make it steerable and observable:
prompt_cache_keyis sent with every request, derived per question from the parts of the prompt that do not change between calls — model, examples, question block — so a rubric's requests are routed together. Pass your own to group or account for them your way, on the client (prompt_cache_key="tenant-42") or per call. A server that refuses the field gets it dropped and the call re-asked, like the other optional fields.usage.cached_tokensis the prompt tokens the provider read from its cache, summed over the call.Nonemeans the provider said nothing — vLLM needs--enable-prompt-tokens-details, and SGLang's Chat Completions route needs--enable-cache-report— while a reported0means a cold or disabled cache.
Measured on one 2388-token prompt carrying two examples, second call differing only in the state: reused
tokens went from 40 — the system prompt alone — to 1010 on llama.cpp, 528 on vLLM and 896 on SGLang once the
state moved to the end. Per-server flags, what each server accepts or ignores, and how to isolate a cache with
cache_salt: docs/local-servers.md.
Failures
Local problems fail before any request is sent: an invalid question, an empty questions mapping, an
unusable state, or grammar on a surface that cannot carry a grammar.
| Error | Raised when |
|---|---|
InvalidQuestionError |
question or few-shot example is locally invalid |
UnsupportedMethodError |
method="grammar" on the Responses surface |
ClientCapabilityError |
the client lacks the attribute the chosen surface needs, or the response carried no choices and no explanation of why |
LabelReadoutError |
the first answer token is not a label, or the provider returned no logprobs (or no alternatives, or no logprob for that token). The provider-side cases are not corrective-retried, and method="auto" answers them with structured |
MalformedAnswerError |
the JSON answer had an unusable shape after corrective retries |
ProviderError |
a provider call failed; .attempts carries the attempt history and .status_code the status the provider reported — including one carried inside a 200 body, which is how OpenRouter reports an upstream failure |
JevperError |
constructor misuse, a bad state message, or content that is not JSON-serializable |
Transient failures (HTTP 408/429/500/502/503/504/529, connection and timeout errors — including the httpx
transport errors whose class names carry neither word) are retried per call with
RetryPolicy(n_retries=2, base_delay=0.5, max_delay=8.0) and exponential
backoff min(base_delay · 3ⁿ, max_delay). Unreadable answers get one corrective retry
(n_retry_malformed) with the failure appended to the conversation. ProviderError propagates after all
questions have settled, in question insertion order.
Verification
pytest -q # the whole suite runs against a local stub HTTP server; no network, no API keys
ruff check src tests # clean except three PYI034 hints (see docs/internals.md)
The suite drives a real openai SDK client at a stdlib ThreadingHTTPServer stub, so the SDK's own
serialization path is exercised; see docs/internals.md.
Optional live check, skipped unless both variables are set:
LLM_MODEL=gpt-5.6-terra OPENAI_API_KEY=... pytest -q tests/test_live.py
Docs
- docs/api.md — constructor and
system_oneparameters, answer/usage/debug shapes, errors - docs/methods.md — the four methods, request bodies, readout rules, surface selection
- docs/local-servers.md — ollama, llama.cpp, vLLM and SGLang: what to pass, turning thinking off, what fits a small GPU
- docs/reasoning.md — native vs two-step reasoning, traces, encrypted content
- docs/few-shot.md — example levels, precedence, rendering, structured examples
- docs/internals.md — module map, call flow, concurrency, retries, testing
License
Apache-2.0 — see LICENSE.
Release files for jevper 0.4.0
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| jevper-0.4.0.tar.gz | 140.9 kB | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| jevper-0.4.0-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 191.9 kB
Release files / jevper-0.4.0.tar.gz
| Download URL | jevper-0.4.0.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 140.9 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
b4de8436fa177fec06acb6cea58e6db8c04e362ac9afa38ee6046b2e101bdf7c
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
7d1ef9d956418d40e5a73c241e9c12697bf2814165488b3b21bbf10a3e74977b
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 24, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / jevper-0.4.0-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | jevper-0.4.0-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 51.1 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
18db0631b7bb01fcc90019fd8a3c78b527359b2b18564e0f7cfff7773862e166
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
90c8f24b0847247e210dcbdb0eb94e203ab6de4b0acaeead005d56aba6369eed
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 24, 2026.
Transparency log