Skip to main content

jevper

The Jev interface — state in, typed questions (noul, choice, score) out, answers carrying probabilities and confidence — on top of any OpenAI-compatible model.

Same call as typesafe-sdk, different backend: point jevper at a hosted LLM or a self-hosted llama.cpp server and code written for Jev keeps working, unchanged.

It does not call the hosted TypeSafe API and does not depend on typesafe-sdk or openai at runtime — the client object is duck-typed. Any object exposing responses.create or chat.completions.create works, including a self-hosted llama.cpp server.

jevper is an independent implementation of the documented System One wire format. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or supported by TypeSafe AI — questions about the API itself belong in their docs.

from openai import OpenAI
from jevper import Choice, SystemOneClient

client = SystemOneClient(OpenAI(), model="gpt-5.6-terra", method="logprobs")

response = client.system_one(
    state="I was charged twice for the same subscription this month.",
    questions={
        "intent": Choice(
            instructions="Pick the intent of the message.",
            criteria={
                "billing": "money, invoices, refunds, charges",
                "technical": "errors, crashes, login or performance problems",
                "sales": "pricing, plans, purchasing, upgrades",
            },
        )
    },
)

answer = response.answers["intent"]
answer.choice        # "billing"
answer.probabilities # {"billing": 0.88, "technical": 0.08, "sales": 0.03}
answer.confidence    # 0.83

Install

pip install jevper

Python 3.10+. The only runtime dependency is pydantic>=2.7.

For development:

git clone https://github.com/zhulinchng/jevper && cd jevper
uv venv && uv pip install -e '.[test]'
pytest -q

What one call does

flowchart LR
    A["state + questions"] --> B["build_parts + assemble: system prompt, few-shot turns, question block, state turns"]
    B --> C{"method (auto resolves first)"}
    C -->|logprobs| D["logprobs=true, top_logprobs=20"]
    C -->|grammar| E["+ GBNF grammar in extra_body"]
    C -->|structured| F["strict JSON schema: probabilities"]
    C -->|discrete| G["strict JSON schema: one label"]
    D --> H["first label token -> softmax over the labels"]
    E --> H
    F --> I["probability dict from JSON"]
    G --> J["one-hot from the chosen label"]
    H --> K["Answer: choice / noul / score"]
    I --> K
    J --> K

Each question becomes its own provider call, so questions are independent and run concurrently (max_concurrency, default 8). Answers come back keyed by your question ids, in insertion order.

Questions

Three types, mirroring the Jev API — Noul answers yes/no with one probability, Choice picks one of your labelled options, Score rates on an ordered scale:

Type Criteria Answer
Noul(instructions=..., criteria={"true": ..., "false": ...}) optional {"type": "noul", "noul": 0.93}
Choice(instructions=..., criteria={"billing": "...", ...}) 2–255 keys {"type": "choice", "choice": "billing", "probabilities": {...}, "confidence": 0.83}
Score(instructions=..., criteria=["Calm", "Frustrated", "Very angry"]) 2–10 levels {"type": "score", "score": 1.05, "legend": {...}, "probabilities": {...}, "confidence": 0.92}

Score.score is the probability-weighted level index (Σ i·pᵢ, levels zero-based), as in the Jev API. Choice takes up to 255 options, the Jev API limit. The two methods that read a label token — logprobs and grammar — stop at 26, because the first token of "AA" is "A"; past 26 options they raise InvalidQuestionError pointing at structured and discrete, which answer in JSON and use two-letter labels. The default method="auto" never hits that error: it answers a wide Choice in JSON.

Questions can also be passed as raw mappings ({"type": "choice", "criteria": {...}}) and are validated the same way.

Methods

method= decides how the decision is elicited. All four share the same label→option mapping, so switching methods does not change your types; only the label alphabet differs (logprobs and grammar need single-letter labels, so they cap at 26 options).

Method Request Readout Needs
auto (default) logprobs, or structured where the provider cannot return logprobs whichever method it resolved to a provider that returns logprobs, or JSON-schema structured output
logprobs logprobs=true, top_logprobs=20 softmax over the labels' logprobs of the first answer token a provider that returns chat logprobs (or the Responses surface with include logprobs)
grammar the same plus a GBNF grammar in extra_body same as logprobs a Chat Completions server that accepts grammar (llama.cpp and friends)
structured strict JSON schema, model returns a probability per option the model's own numbers, rescaled to sum 1 when off by more than 1e-6 JSON-schema structured output
discrete strict JSON schema, model returns one option one-hot distribution JSON-schema structured output

auto is the default because logprobs are not universal: OpenAI's reasoning models reject them (logprobs are not supported with reasoning models.), Anthropic and Gemini's OpenAI-compatibility endpoint never had them, and a model that returns a logprob with no alternatives gives you no distribution at all. auto reads the logprobs where they exist — they are one short call and the model's real distribution rather than a self-report — and answers in JSON where they do not, remembering the verdict per model and surface. See docs/methods.md for the provider table, the exact request bodies, the readout rules and the failure modes.

The same holds for the request fields jevper adds: a server that refuses structured output, the reasoning parameters, the Responses include list or the cache key gets that field dropped and the call re-asked, so a partially implemented server answers instead of failing. debug["server_limits"] reports what it refused.

Reasoning

Pass reasoning=ReasoningConfig(...) to make the model think before it classifies:

from jevper import ReasoningConfig, reasoning_text

client = SystemOneClient(OpenAI(), model="gpt-5.6-terra", reasoning=ReasoningConfig(effort="medium"))

response = client.system_one(state=..., questions=...)
reasoning_text(response.reasoning)   # the trace, as text

mode="auto" (the default) uses native provider reasoning on the Responses surface and a two-step think-then-classify path on Chat Completions, where the analysis text is replayed as an assistant turn before the answer. The trace always lands on response.reasoning, and the two-step analysis call's usage is counted in response.usage. See docs/reasoning.md.

Few-shot examples

Examples are chat turns (question block + example state, then the expected answer), so the demonstration is always in the format the active method expects. They can be attached at three levels:

from jevper import Choice, Example, SystemOneClient

question = Choice(
    criteria={"billing": "...", "technical": "..."},
    examples=[Example(state="Charged twice for one order", answer="billing")],
)

client = SystemOneClient(OpenAI(), model="gpt-5.6-terra",
                         examples=[Example(state="Login fails", answer="technical")])  # fallback for every question

client.system_one(state=..., questions={"intent": question},
                  examples={"intent": [...]})  # or a bare sequence for all questions

Precedence is question → per call → constructor, and the first non-empty level wins. examples is excluded from model_dump(), so question dumps keep exactly the Jev wire keys. See docs/few-shot.md.

Response

response.model                 # the model actually used
response.answers               # {"intent": ChoiceAnswer(...)}
response.nouls / .choices / .scores   # filtered views
response.usage                 # input_tokens, output_tokens, reasoning_tokens, cached_tokens, n_calls, n_retries, latency
response.reasoning             # tuple[ReasoningContentPart, ...]
response.debug                 # per-attempt requests/responses, retry reasons, normalization notes

response.model_dump_json() serializes to the Jev answer shape — the answer field names and JSON keys match POST /v1/systemone. Token counts are None when any constituent call omitted them; n_calls counts the provider calls that returned a result, including analysis passes and corrective retries, while n_retries counts transient-failure retries only. A failed attempt appears in debug["llm_attempts"] but not in usage. See docs/api.md for the full reference.

Prompt caching

Every provider that serves these calls caches the prefix of a prompt and reuses it for the next request that starts the same way, and jevper is shaped for it: the state comes last, so the system prompt, the few-shot examples and the question block are identical across every state classified with one rubric.

client = SystemOneClient(OpenAI(), model="gpt-5.6")

client.system_one(state=record_a, questions=rubric)
client.system_one(state=record_b, questions=rubric)   # the shared prefix is reused

Two things make it steerable and observable:

  • prompt_cache_key is sent with every request, derived per question from the parts of the prompt that do not change between calls — model, examples, question block — so a rubric's requests are routed together. Pass your own to group or account for them your way, on the client (prompt_cache_key="tenant-42") or per call. A server that refuses the field gets it dropped and the call re-asked, like the other optional fields.
  • usage.cached_tokens is the prompt tokens the provider read from its cache, summed over the call. None means the provider said nothing — vLLM needs --enable-prompt-tokens-details, and SGLang's Chat Completions route needs --enable-cache-report — while a reported 0 means a cold or disabled cache.

Measured on one 2388-token prompt carrying two examples, second call differing only in the state: reused tokens went from 40 — the system prompt alone — to 1010 on llama.cpp, 528 on vLLM and 896 on SGLang once the state moved to the end. Per-server flags, what each server accepts or ignores, and how to isolate a cache with cache_salt: docs/local-servers.md.

Failures

Local problems fail before any request is sent: an invalid question, an empty questions mapping, an unusable state, or grammar on a surface that cannot carry a grammar.

Error Raised when
InvalidQuestionError question or few-shot example is locally invalid
UnsupportedMethodError method="grammar" on the Responses surface
ClientCapabilityError the client lacks the attribute the chosen surface needs, or the response carried no choices and no explanation of why
LabelReadoutError the first answer token is not a label, or the provider returned no logprobs (or no alternatives, or no logprob for that token). The provider-side cases are not corrective-retried, and method="auto" answers them with structured
MalformedAnswerError the JSON answer had an unusable shape after corrective retries
ProviderError a provider call failed; .attempts carries the attempt history and .status_code the status the provider reported — including one carried inside a 200 body, which is how OpenRouter reports an upstream failure
JevperError constructor misuse, a bad state message, or content that is not JSON-serializable

Transient failures (HTTP 408/429/500/502/503/504/529, connection and timeout errors — including the httpx transport errors whose class names carry neither word) are retried per call with RetryPolicy(n_retries=2, base_delay=0.5, max_delay=8.0) and exponential backoff min(base_delay · 3ⁿ, max_delay). Unreadable answers get one corrective retry (n_retry_malformed) with the failure appended to the conversation. ProviderError propagates after all questions have settled, in question insertion order.

Verification

pytest -q                      # the whole suite runs against a local stub HTTP server; no network, no API keys
ruff check src tests           # clean except three PYI034 hints (see docs/internals.md)

The suite drives a real openai SDK client at a stdlib ThreadingHTTPServer stub, so the SDK's own serialization path is exercised; see docs/internals.md.

Optional live check, skipped unless both variables are set:

LLM_MODEL=gpt-5.6-terra OPENAI_API_KEY=... pytest -q tests/test_live.py

Docs

  • docs/api.md — constructor and system_one parameters, answer/usage/debug shapes, errors
  • docs/methods.md — the four methods, request bodies, readout rules, surface selection
  • docs/local-servers.md — ollama, llama.cpp, vLLM and SGLang: what to pass, turning thinking off, what fits a small GPU
  • docs/reasoning.md — native vs two-step reasoning, traces, encrypted content
  • docs/few-shot.md — example levels, precedence, rendering, structured examples
  • docs/internals.md — module map, call flow, concurrency, retries, testing

License

Apache-2.0 — see LICENSE.

Release files for jevper 0.4.0

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for jevper 0.4.0
File Size Uploaded
jevper-0.4.0.tar.gz 140.9 kB Details

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for jevper 0.4.0
File Interpreter ABI Platform
jevper-0.4.0-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details

Total release size: 191.9 kB

Release files / jevper-0.4.0.tar.gz

Download URL jevper-0.4.0.tar.gz
Size 140.9 kB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
b4de8436fa177fec06acb6cea58e6db8c04e362ac9afa38ee6046b2e101bdf7c
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
7d1ef9d956418d40e5a73c241e9c12697bf2814165488b3b21bbf10a3e74977b
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 24, 2026.

Transparency log

Release files / jevper-0.4.0-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL jevper-0.4.0-py3-none-any.whl
Size 51.1 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
18db0631b7bb01fcc90019fd8a3c78b527359b2b18564e0f7cfff7773862e166
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
90c8f24b0847247e210dcbdb0eb94e203ab6de4b0acaeead005d56aba6369eed
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14

Provenance

Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.

PyPI Publish Attestation

PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.

Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 24, 2026.

Transparency log

Release history Release notifications | RSS feed

0.6.0

2 release files

0.5.3

2 release files

0.5.2

2 release files

0.5.1

2 release files

0.5.0

2 release files

This release

0.4.0 This release

2 release files

0.3.0

2 release files

0.2.3

2 release files

0.2.2

2 release files

0.2.1

2 release files

0.2.0

2 release files

0.1.3

2 release files

0.1.2

2 release files

0.1.1

2 release files

0.1.0

2 release files

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page