jevper
The Jev interface — state in, typed questions (noul, choice, score) out,
answers carrying probabilities and confidence — on top of any OpenAI-compatible model.
Same call as typesafe-sdk, different backend: point jevper at a hosted LLM or a self-hosted llama.cpp
server and code written for Jev keeps working, unchanged.
It does not call the hosted TypeSafe API and does not depend on typesafe-sdk or openai at runtime — the
client object is duck-typed. Any object exposing responses.create or chat.completions.create works,
including a self-hosted llama.cpp server.
jevperis an independent implementation of the documented System One wire format. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or supported by TypeSafe AI — questions about the API itself belong in their docs.
from openai import OpenAI
from jevper import Choice, SystemOneClient
client = SystemOneClient(OpenAI(), model="gpt-5.6-terra", method="logprobs")
response = client.system_one(
state="I was charged twice for the same subscription this month.",
questions={
"intent": Choice(
instructions="Pick the intent of the message.",
criteria={
"billing": "money, invoices, refunds, charges",
"technical": "errors, crashes, login or performance problems",
"sales": "pricing, plans, purchasing, upgrades",
},
)
},
)
answer = response.answers["intent"]
answer.choice # "billing"
answer.probabilities # {"billing": 0.88, "technical": 0.08, "sales": 0.03}
answer.confidence # 0.83
Install
pip install jevper
Python 3.10+. The only runtime dependency is pydantic>=2.7.
For development:
git clone https://github.com/zhulinchng/jevper && cd jevper
uv venv && uv pip install -e '.[test]'
pytest -q
What one call does
flowchart LR
A["state + questions"] --> B["build_messages: system prompt, state turns, few-shot turns, question block"]
B --> C{"method"}
C -->|logprobs| D["logprobs=true, top_logprobs=20"]
C -->|grammar| E["+ GBNF grammar in extra_body"]
C -->|structured| F["strict JSON schema: probabilities"]
C -->|discrete| G["strict JSON schema: one label"]
D --> H["first label token -> softmax over the labels"]
E --> H
F --> I["probability dict from JSON"]
G --> J["one-hot from the chosen label"]
H --> K["Answer: choice / noul / score"]
I --> K
J --> K
Each question becomes its own provider call, so questions are independent and run concurrently
(max_concurrency, default 8). Answers come back keyed by your question ids, in insertion order.
Questions
Three types, mirroring the Jev API — Noul answers yes/no with one probability, Choice picks one of your
labelled options, Score rates on an ordered scale:
| Type | Criteria | Answer |
|---|---|---|
Noul(instructions=..., criteria={"true": ..., "false": ...}) |
optional | {"type": "noul", "noul": 0.93} |
Choice(instructions=..., criteria={"billing": "...", ...}) |
2–255 keys | {"type": "choice", "choice": "billing", "probabilities": {...}, "confidence": 0.83} |
Score(instructions=..., criteria=["Calm", "Frustrated", "Very angry"]) |
2–10 levels | {"type": "score", "score": 1.05, "legend": {...}, "probabilities": {...}, "confidence": 0.92} |
Score.score is the probability-weighted level index (Σ i·pᵢ, levels zero-based), as in the Jev API.
Choice takes up to 255 options, the Jev API limit. The two methods that read a label token —
logprobs and grammar — stop at 26, because the first token of "AA" is "A"; past 26 options they
raise InvalidQuestionError pointing at structured and discrete, which answer in JSON and use
two-letter labels.
Questions can also be passed as raw mappings ({"type": "choice", "criteria": {...}}) and are validated the
same way.
Methods
method= decides how the decision is elicited. All four share the same label→option mapping, so switching
methods does not change your types; only the label alphabet differs (logprobs and grammar need
single-letter labels, so they cap at 26 options).
| Method | Request | Readout | Needs |
|---|---|---|---|
logprobs (default) |
logprobs=true, top_logprobs=20 |
softmax over the labels' logprobs of the first answer token | a provider that returns chat logprobs (or the Responses surface with include logprobs) |
grammar |
the same plus a GBNF grammar in extra_body |
same as logprobs |
a Chat Completions server that accepts grammar (llama.cpp and friends) |
structured |
strict JSON schema, model returns a probability per option | the model's own numbers, rescaled to sum 1 when off by more than 1e-6 |
JSON-schema structured output |
discrete |
strict JSON schema, model returns one option | one-hot distribution | JSON-schema structured output |
logprobs is the default because it needs no provider-specific field beyond logprobs, and it reads the
model's real distribution rather than a sampled answer. See docs/methods.md for the exact
request bodies, readout rules and failure modes.
Reasoning
Pass reasoning=ReasoningConfig(...) to make the model think before it classifies:
from jevper import ReasoningConfig, reasoning_text
client = SystemOneClient(OpenAI(), model="gpt-5.6-terra", reasoning=ReasoningConfig(effort="medium"))
response = client.system_one(state=..., questions=...)
reasoning_text(response.reasoning) # the trace, as text
mode="auto" (the default) uses native provider reasoning on the Responses surface and a two-step
think-then-classify path on Chat Completions, where the analysis text is replayed as an assistant turn before
the answer. The trace always lands on response.reasoning, and the two-step analysis call's usage is counted
in response.usage. See docs/reasoning.md.
Few-shot examples
Examples are chat turns (example state + question block, then the expected answer), so the demonstration is always in the format the active method expects. They can be attached at three levels:
from jevper import Choice, Example, SystemOneClient
question = Choice(
criteria={"billing": "...", "technical": "..."},
examples=[Example(state="Charged twice for one order", answer="billing")],
)
client = SystemOneClient(OpenAI(), model="gpt-5.6-terra",
examples=[Example(state="Login fails", answer="technical")]) # fallback for every question
client.system_one(state=..., questions={"intent": question},
examples={"intent": [...]}) # or a bare sequence for all questions
Precedence is question → per call → constructor, and the first non-empty level wins. examples is excluded
from model_dump(), so question dumps keep exactly the Jev wire keys. See
docs/few-shot.md.
Response
response.model # the model actually used
response.answers # {"intent": ChoiceAnswer(...)}
response.nouls / .choices / .scores # filtered views
response.usage # input_tokens, output_tokens, reasoning_tokens, n_calls, n_retries, latency
response.reasoning # tuple[ReasoningContentPart, ...]
response.debug # per-attempt requests/responses, retry reasons, normalization notes
response.model_dump_json() serializes to the Jev answer shape — the answer field names and JSON keys match
POST /v1/systemone. Token counts are None when any constituent call omitted them; n_calls counts every
provider call including analysis passes and corrective retries, while n_retries counts transient-failure
retries only. See docs/api.md for the full reference.
Failures
Local problems fail before any request is sent: an invalid question, an empty questions mapping, an
unusable state, or grammar on a surface that cannot carry a grammar.
| Error | Raised when |
|---|---|
InvalidQuestionError |
question or few-shot example is locally invalid |
UnsupportedMethodError |
method="grammar" on the Responses surface |
ClientCapabilityError |
the client lacks the attribute the chosen surface needs, or returned no choices |
LabelReadoutError |
the first answer token is not a label, or no logprobs came back |
MalformedAnswerError |
the JSON answer had an unusable shape after corrective retries |
ProviderError |
a provider call failed; .attempts carries the attempt history |
Transient failures (HTTP 429/500/502/503/504/529, or an exception whose class name contains Connection or
Timeout) are retried per call with RetryPolicy(n_retries=2, base_delay=0.5, max_delay=8.0) and exponential
backoff min(base_delay · 3ⁿ, max_delay). Unreadable answers get one corrective retry
(n_retry_malformed) with the failure appended to the conversation. ProviderError propagates after all
questions have settled, in question insertion order.
Verification
pytest -q # the whole suite runs against a local stub HTTP server; no network, no API keys
ruff check src tests # clean except three PYI034 hints (see docs/internals.md)
The suite drives a real openai SDK client at a stdlib ThreadingHTTPServer stub, so the SDK's own
serialization path is exercised; see docs/internals.md.
Optional live check, skipped unless both variables are set:
LLM_MODEL=gpt-5.6-terra OPENAI_API_KEY=... pytest -q tests/test_live.py
Docs
- docs/api.md — constructor and
system_oneparameters, answer/usage/debug shapes, errors - docs/methods.md — the four methods, request bodies, readout rules, surface selection
- docs/reasoning.md — native vs two-step reasoning, traces, encrypted content
- docs/few-shot.md — example levels, precedence, rendering, structured examples
- docs/internals.md — module map, call flow, concurrency, retries, testing
License
Apache-2.0 — see LICENSE.
Release files for jevper 0.1.1
For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.
Source distribution (sdist)
| File | Size | Uploaded | |
|---|---|---|---|
| jevper-0.1.1.tar.gz | 50.8 kB | Details |
Built distribution (wheel)
| File | Interpreter | ABI | Platform | Reset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| jevper-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl | Python 3 | none | any | Details |
Total release size: 83.4 kB
Release files / jevper-0.1.1.tar.gz
| Download URL | jevper-0.1.1.tar.gz |
|---|---|
| Size | 50.8 kB |
| Tags | Source |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
2504b3db2164b6da228022418fa2f68f8393fb88f786e217dd2d20919ac92047
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
6a46d9fc5980229d5c8f1096d8c05f80c162e7f5d375aba53def9304eae2c7a3
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 23, 2026.
Transparency logRelease files / jevper-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl
| Download URL | jevper-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl |
|---|---|
| Size | 32.6 kB |
| Tags | Python 3 |
|
SHA-256 checksum How to use checksums |
cd3111d97f8dd7fbf4852e21a603e227585700ac1c62088b8e80674efd7056a0
|
|
BLAKE2b-256 checksum How to use checksums |
03125ed3bc1b8ea9629db99b3a08f21554c9f5a7ef11a8b2a9c0a9611bb29cf2
|
| Upload date | |
|
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing? What is trusted publishing? |
Yes |
| Uploaded via |
twine/7.0.0 CPython/3.13.14
|
Provenance
Provenance describes where a file came from. On PyPI, provenance is shared via attestations, which provide a verifiable record of the build or publishing details. View details, limitations and caveats.
PyPI Publish Attestation
PyPI verified that this artifact, at this checksum, originated from the publisher listed below.
Signed by GitHub Actions, verified by PyPI on Sep 23, 2026.
Transparency log