Skip to main content

olmoearth_inferenceX

olmoearth_inferenceX checks an Earth-observation map after inference: where it is likely wrong, how wrong it is, which part you can trust, and which of two maps is more accurate. It was built to check OlmoEarth's inference outputs. It reads only the per-class scores a model writes out, never runs the model and needs no torch, so it works as well on other models' maps and on published products that ship a confidence layer.

Structure of olmoearth-inferenceX. Left: Sentinel-2 imagery goes through a model's encoder and decoder to its outputs, a class map and a confidence map. Right: the outputs are pooled to windows. Without reference labels, ranking the windows by confidence gives the review set, and comparing two maps A and B gives the disagreement map. With a labelled sample, a sample of the windows where A and B differ names the more accurate map by an exact test and gives their accuracy difference with a 95% interval; a random sample with reference labels gives the error rate with an exact 95% interval and, by exact zone tests, the certified zone; a sample of each class's confident calls gives each class's error with a 95% interval and the classes not to trust

Documentation: https://olmoearth-inferencex.readthedocs.io/

Install

pip install "olmoearth-inferencex[geo]"    # Python 3.11 to 3.13; without [geo] it reads .npy only
oe-inferencex demo                          # a real Dynamic World tile; needs no data

Usage

Question Commands Labels
Where do I look first? assess scores.tif --out audit none
How wrong is the map? sample scores.tif --budget 300 --design random --out to_label.csv, fill in wrong, then estimate to_label.csv about 300 random windows
Which part can I trust? certify to_label.csv --alpha 0.05 the same windows
Which of two maps is more accurate? sample a.tif --other b.tif --budget 100 --out pairs.csv, fill in reference_class, then estimate pairs.csv about 100, where the maps differ
Which class's confident calls can't I trust? sample scores.tif --design audit --per-class 20 --out audit.csv, fill in reference_class, then estimate audit.csv --alpha 0.05 about 20 per class
Where do two maps differ? compare a.tif b.tif --out diff none

Every command starts with oe-inferencex. The input is the model's per-class scores before the argmax, as a GeoTIFF or a .npy array of shape (C, H, W). plan says how many labels a question needs, decide turns a result into yes, no or undetermined, and --help lists each command's options. Quick start runs each one on a test map.

Limits: without labels it says where to look, not how wrong the map is. Ranking by confidence can weaken when a model moves to a new place or year, and errors that come from two legends drawing a class boundary differently cannot be told from the imagery or the model, so they need labels. A model run on inputs unlike its training data can be confident and wrong (--condition treats each input condition on its own). Every interval and certified zone assumes the labels are right, and labelling more and rerunning is a second test, except on a sequential sample.

Use from an agent

oe-inferencex mcp is a local MCP server; nothing is hosted. Add it to any MCP client as the command uvx --from "olmoearth-inferencex[geo,mcp]" oe-inferencex mcp, for example in Claude Code:

claude mcp add --scope user oe-inferencex -- uvx --from "olmoearth-inferencex[geo,mcp]" oe-inferencex mcp

Use a capable model: in a pilot, smaller models dropped the limits the tools state. To try it, write the demo tile into an empty folder, start the agent there and ask:

uvx --from olmoearth-inferencex oe-inferencex demo

Where should I look first in oe_inferencex_demo/sample_probabilities.npy? Use windows of 1 pixel, and grade the order against oe_inferencex_demo/sample_truth.npy.

Evidence

Tested on linear probes of sixteen encoders over the tasks of Ai2's embedding suite, on seven published land-cover products against six reference samples, and on two deployed OlmoEarth models. Within the data a model was trained for, its confidence ranks the map's errors well; after a move to a new place and year it ranked them below the preregistered bar, and most of its confident errors lay on one class boundary that the two legends draw differently. The technical report and the research record give every result and its limits.

Development and license

Clone the repository, then uv sync and uv run pytest. The experiments and the tests that check the recorded results against the released package are in the research record. Apache License 2.0 (LICENSE); cite with CITATION.cff; questions in GitHub issues.

Metadata

Release files for olmoearth-inferencex 1.12.2

For a detailed explanation of source distributions (sdists) and built distributions (wheels), please see the package formats documentation.

Source distribution (sdist)

Source distribution for olmoearth-inferencex 1.12.2
File Size Uploaded
olmoearth_inferencex-1.12.2.tar.gz 520.0 kB Details

Built distribution (wheel)

Table of built distributions (wheels) for olmoearth-inferencex 1.12.2
File Interpreter ABI Platform
olmoearth_inferencex-1.12.2-py3-none-any.whl Python 3 none any Details

Total release size: 1.0 MB

Release files / olmoearth_inferencex-1.12.2.tar.gz

Download URL olmoearth_inferencex-1.12.2.tar.gz
Size 520.0 kB
Tags Source
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
4c5e8994e386f38e6373cf31c9bc569bd8c950795e9c8e94a8f2563a6f72fb89
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
7fd008eaf6a95c1f6565084678cb2eca97ce06f4623f0ae6b952e135944f759f
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via uv/0.13.1 {"installer":{"name":"uv","version":"0.13.1","subcommand":["publish"]},"python":null,"implementation":{"name":null,"version":null},"distro":{"name":"Ubuntu","version":"24.04","id":"noble","libc":null},"system":{"name":null,"release":null},"cpu":null,"openssl_version":null,"setuptools_version":null,"rustc_version":null,"ci":true}

Release files / olmoearth_inferencex-1.12.2-py3-none-any.whl

Download URL olmoearth_inferencex-1.12.2-py3-none-any.whl
Size 526.3 kB
Tags Python 3
SHA-256 checksum
How to use checksums
af84fd764ca62620156721f105325b8aff26066870cd44e805eead1b6737d701
BLAKE2b-256 checksum
How to use checksums
b6f7e2456e9b10661ef1932b4cb5bb8f8a3a16632d0a26f9880a5208e4cd0722
Upload date
Uploaded using Trusted Publishing?
What is trusted publishing?
Yes
Uploaded via uv/0.13.1 {"installer":{"name":"uv","version":"0.13.1","subcommand":["publish"]},"python":null,"implementation":{"name":null,"version":null},"distro":{"name":"Ubuntu","version":"24.04","id":"noble","libc":null},"system":{"name":null,"release":null},"cpu":null,"openssl_version":null,"setuptools_version":null,"rustc_version":null,"ci":true}

Release history Release notifications | RSS feed

This release

1.12.2 This release

2 release files

1.12.1

2 release files

1.12.0

2 release files

1.11.0

2 release files

1.10.0

2 release files

1.9.0

2 release files

1.8.0

2 release files

1.7.1

2 release files

1.7.0

2 release files

1.6.0

2 release files

1.5.0

2 release files

1.4.1

2 release files

1.4.0

2 release files

1.3.1

2 release files

1.3.0

2 release files

1.2.0

2 release files

1.1.3

2 release files

1.1.2

2 release files

1.1.1

2 release files

1.1.0

2 release files

Anthropic, PBC Visionary sponsor Bloomberg Visionary sponsor Hudson River Trading Visionary sponsor Meta Visionary sponsor NVIDIA Visionary sponsor Microsoft Sustainability sponsor Depot Continuous Integration AWS Cloud computing and Security Sponsor Datadog Monitoring Fastly CDN Google Download Analytics Sentry Error logging StatusPage Status page